Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Coach1310

3rd Base for 2009

97 posts in this topic

What kind of options are we looking at? Who do you guys/gals want? What do you think will happen?

I'm suprised Gardy is so in love with Harris. Not much of a hitter. Blasts one every once in a while, but a good fielder. All Buscher does is hit .300 and play average defense...not much power.

I'm not sure what they'll do, but I hope it isn't Beltre or Blaylock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't care who plays there as long as they hit 20 homeruns and drive in 90-100 like most 3rd basemen in the league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for reference these are the 8 main 3rd Baseman for the playoff teams and their stats..Just HRs and RBIs.

American

Figgins LAA 1HR 22RBI

CredeCHSOX 17HR 55RBI

LongoriaRAYS 27HR 85RBI

LowellBOS 17HR 73RBI

National

FelizPHI 14HR 58RBI

Blake LAD 21HR 81RBI

RamirezCHC 27HR 111RBI

HallMIL 15HR 55RBI

For arguements sake Those 8 average out to 17HRs and 68RBIs. It's not like there are a ton of 25HR 100RBI 3rd baseman out there. Not saying I don't want one, just not lots out there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harris hits a ton of extra base hits, and is an excellent fielder, I can see why Gardy likes him. BUT- we need an everyday 3rd baseman with 20+ HR potential and a decent glove. It wouldn't have broke my heart any if Koskie had never left. Now he will probably never play again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you add Harris and a whole year with Bucher, the numbers will come out just about where we want them...15-20 HRS and 80+ RBI. Not everyday 3rd basemen, but a good platoon system and both can come off the bench in different areas. The only thing we really need is relief and then almost everybody does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

spend the money and get a third baseman that can hit bombs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see the Twins go after Blake. I don't know what his staus is but he's been a solid player for awhile now, puts up decent #'s and seems like he'd fit in nicely with this club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should try and get A-rod???? just a thought? shocked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should try and get A-rod???? just a thought? shocked

We wouldn't be able to win a WS while he is here. He is a WS jinx.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard that Gardy mentioned moving Cuddy in to play 3rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade Young for an everyday 3B and move Cuddy or Span to LF. That would solve a few problems. Blake would be a great fit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Young has to go somewhere other than Left. I don't have a warm fuzzy when he is out there. A good hitter, but his defense is so so at best.

Cuddy at 3rd HMMMMM.

G.C.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Young was not terrible in left.

He did have 11 assists.

He played 151 innings and had 8 errors. Thats about 1 error every 19 games. Thats a feilding percentage of .973. Not the best in the league by any means but still not bad.

My guess is that Cuddy, Kubel, or Young is gone before next year. Gomez and Span are the future so they will be in there.

The only way I see them keeping everyone is if they are worried about durability or if they are worried about the young guys not progressing.

Gomez and Span could be future All Stars, I think we know what we'll get out of Cuddy year after year. Kubel and Young looked better and better as the season went on.

With that said I vote for trading Cuddy despite the fact that I like him and like having him on the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am guessing that Cuddy will be here next year. He can fill in in right, 1st base...maybe 3rd and be the right handed DH.

If he can stay healthy.

Young could be the odd man out, especially if they can get a good reliever.

Also hopefully with another year under their belt, the starters can go 1 more inning per game and keep the bullpen fresh. Just hope that non of them do a Boof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not saying to get rid of Young. He just scares me out there, His range is limited and seems to have trouble locating the ball right away.

Young Mr Young is just that young and needs some time to develop more in the outfield. Where did he play when in Tampa.

G.C.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hope they would keep Kubel next year, especially being he was #2 on the team for HR's this year. I feel that if he would've played everyday, he would have been a bigger part of the offensive production. I think he's kind of like David Ortiz, look what he did when he started playing everyday!!! As far as 3rd base, I like Harris there, but we definitely need to add at least 1 20+ HR a year guy to the line up.

Brian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess would be trading Kubel for someone if they feel the need to move someone. Wouldn't like to see that, but Young isn't quite polished enough to get much for and Cuddyer will now have health questions following him.

Remember, this was the rebuilding year. Next year they could be just a little better at what they do and how they play with each other, then the should be considered contenders for the new stadium.

We were blessed with a month of wins they weren't supposed to be able to get this year. All the while, they learned more about each other and themselves. Even if they hold tight, we can expect a little better next year. This year rally showed how improtant health is to a small market team. Through all the injuries, we only needed one more win. Could have been a Cuddyer homer run, a Neishek hold, or something that simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For reference... the 3rd Baseman who will be Free Agents this off season:

Third basemen(age in parentheses)

Rich Aurilia (37)

Casey Blake (35)

Hank Blalock (28) - $6.2MM club option'09 with a $0.25MM buyout

Willie Bloomquist (31)

Aaron Boone (36)

Russell Branyan (33)

Craig Counsell (38)

Joe Crede (31)

Nomar Garciaparra (35)

Wes Helms (33) - $3.75MM club option for '09

Mark Loretta (37)

Fernando Tatis (34)

Ramon Vazquez (32)

That's an old crop of players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   Thats the thing, I can't find really any good pictures of one. I was given this auger a few days ago buy a guy who didn't use or want it.  He only used it once when he forgot his power auger. There is a string with a price tag on it for $89. It was sitting in his machine shed in a corner collecting dust.   I cleaned up the auger and touched it up. There was a slight ding in the auger flighting up a turn or two from the bottom. That I fixed. However,  the mounting head for the blades didn't have any of the original powder paint damaged, none had flaked off, and there was no rust spots. The blades where rusted up but not damaged. I assume if they were bent the powder paint would have expanded & flaked off. The two blade angles seem to look like they are how they should be. So I'm really kinda leaning that the blade mounts might not be bent with the way it looks.    If I look at the shaver blades from the top or bottom they look like a normal shaver blade. However, when looked at from the side they seem to have a very slight curve that matches the blade mount. Did jiffy have a design like this different from the others? So I'm confused.......what would be the odds of both the blade mount sides being bent to what looks like exact angles.......if they were bent what is the odds of both blades seeming to conform to the bends without cracking or breaking........I measured from one outside blade edge to the other and got 8in......but I know 8in augers can go from a range of 7.5in-8.5in depending on brand and other things......If the blade mount ads were bent I would think some powder paint would have flaked off.......I'll do the ice bucket trick.....was hoping someone had one or could chime in. It looks a little like a design between a flat shaver and a curved blade if it's not bent......I do really like the design if that is what it is meant to be. I just really don't know if they are bent or not bent. Confusing..... 
    • I wax every exposed part of the string. 
    • BD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i wasnt good enough for a lakeside lot!!!!!!!!!!!
    •   Is that you, or the back of BD then?
    • well, that picture he posted?????????? that was my boat and i was part owner of that dock if that tells ya anything!!!!!!!!! yea he's been there!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    •   Ok but you told BigDave huh? Maybe he'll give it up?
    • Hi guys,   I am a beginner and just purchased a Matthew Halon bow last year.  However, I haven't waxed the bowstring and figured I should do it before this season starts.   My bowstring doesn't seem to have any colors on it showing where to avoid waxing it.    Can somebody explain or direct me to a video on where to avoid waxing on the bowstring of a Matthew Bow?  I know the part about rubbing the wax into the string good, but I am unsure which part of the bowstring to avoid waxing exactly.    Thank you. 
    • North of the cities.........................south of I Falls!!!!!!!!!!!!! west of st cloud!
    •   Come give me a north-south zone at least!
    • I am just an outsider looking in, so I have an opinion and that is all it is not fact. I have fished Mille Lacs quite a bit over the last 3-4 years.  The fishing has just gotten better. I don't know if it is because the fish really are lacking a food source or if there are just that many fish in the lake. This past Monday we were there to chase smallies. While we did do OK on the smallmouth we did happen to catch 6 walleye up on the rock in 6-12 ft. All looked fat and healthy. Seemed unusually shallow for this time of year. I don't care if this lake stays catch and release only. It is a blast catching 10-15 walleye over 20in in an afternoon. I just hope that "IF" the walleye population is on the decline that politics and special interests, including the tribes, will be able to step back and allow the lake to be managed as necessary to keep this incredible fishery alive. Just my opinion.
  • Our Sponsors