james_walleye Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 Im a bit surprised too see the eagles as 10 point favorites. Thats a big number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LundExplorer Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 55-3 Eagles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 Holy dump!!! 10 points? If I was in Vegas I think I would put money down on the Vikings with that point spread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quickstrike Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 the more i think about it i actually think it will be a lower scoring game then i first posted. Down to earth makes some good points, and i don't believe their first game this year was high scoring either. vikes 24 eagles 21. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnvikingsfreak Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 41-0 vikings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandbar Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 The Vikes played the Eagles pretty tough in week 2. A couple mistakes really cost Minnesota the game. Both teams have changed alot since week 2. I like when the national sports media doesn't give the Purple a chance to win again this week. We need a little chip on the shoulder. I think the Vikings defense will have another big game. The offense and Daunte will put up big numbers.Vikings - 31Eagles - 21Sandbar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzsaw Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 Down to earth, I hate to correct you but I believe Minnesota is the lowest seeded team in the playoffs and would have to travel to St. Louis if we both win. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I just heard that information yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wadinator Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 I think that the Vikes need to jump ahead early and stay ahead to win the game. They just don't have the confidence or the coaching to win a close contest or get a come-from-behind win. If the Vikes score first, then... Vikes 31 (of course ) Eagles 24 If the Eagles score first, then... Vikes 17 Eagles 35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSenarighi Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 Being a bias Vikes fan like pretty much everyone here, I too am going to pick the Vikes against all rational thought, because there are so unpredictable.Vikings 27Eagles 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 Yeah I guess your right. For some reason I was thinking Minnesota was the higher seed. Not sure what was going on in my head there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzsaw Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 You've had the same fever I've had since the Vikes big win. If only we could get to Atlanta and pay back them Falcons for their dirty work in '98! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad711 Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 Vikings 31 Eagles 24 I fell alot more confident about THIS game compared to last week. Goota ask what is SKOL Vikings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 No TO's, keep penalties down, and get TD's not FG's when you get the chances. Thats what needs too happen for a win. Sounds simple, we'll see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JIvers Posted January 12, 2005 Author Share Posted January 12, 2005 Before I go into why I would pick the Eagles, I will say again that I am a Vike Fan to the end, and will be wearing Purple this Sunday and rooting them on, come what may. Just like I was wearing Purple and cheering for the Vikings this past Sunday...even though I picked the Packers to win in a blow-out. Very glad to be so wrong. Here is why "my head says Eagles". Yes, TO is out, but the last time I checked, Donovan McNabb and Brian Westbrook were healthy and coming off basically three weeks' rest, when you count the two games Andy Reid kept his starters on the sidelines for most of the first half, and all of the second. Plus, the Eagles defense is a lot better than the pathetic Green Bay defense that Daunte shredded. I am not going to write the Vikings off completely, but I am pretty sure the points will not come so easy this Sunday in Philly. I have also given up trying to figure out this years' Vikings--I have no idea what to expect from them one week to the next. I do know that McNabb will probably not throw four or five stupid passes like Favre did, which is why the Vikings' defensive "improvement" a lot of people talk about may be no more that Favre's mistakes. Favre will not be playing QB for the Eagles this Sunday. Could the Vikings win this Sunday? Yes. They have the offense to match Philly's defense, and I have no idea what the Eagles' O will be like without TO. However, my head says Jevon Kearse and the rest of the Eagles' defense can slow down the Vikings, while McNabb and Westbrook can show why the Vikings defense is ranked near bottom for all meaningful categories. My Purple heart says the Vikings deal with all this, and pull out the win--like last Sunday, I am hoping my head is wrong again. One more thing: a lot of Viking fans here are saying the win against the Packers is enough for the Vikings. I wonder if the team themselves doesn't feel the same way. And, remember, Mike "Duh" Tice is still coaching this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 I'm not saying it can't happen, but for those of you predicting 30+ points for the Viking offense, how are expecting that to happen? I know its pretty easy to be optimistic about the Vikes after last weeks win, but they aren't playing the Packers again. The last time the Vikes scored 30+ points against a team other than the Packers was on October 17 against the Saints. The Eagles Defense allows just over 16 points per game and if you take out the last two weeks of the season when they were playing the reserves it drops down to just under 14. Add a hobbled Randy Moss and Moe Williams into the mix. They only put up 16 week 2 with both of them healthy. Would like to hear a few of you expand a bit on the reasoning your predictions. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Wettschreck Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 I'm a Vikes fan big time, but I'm just not seeing a win. Jevon Kearse vs. Goldberg = Dauntee running a lot. Sure, he's good on the move, the Eagles defense is better. Their secondary is sending 3 (I think) guys to the pro-bowl.Moss isn't 100%, Moe (the man) Williams may not even play...We won't be outscoring Philly.I'd like to go with my heart but my heads tellin me 24-10 Philly. I hope I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfisher Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 If we wouldn't of had the poorest referees in the NFL when we last played the Eagles, I honestly think we would have won the game. Vikes 31 Eagles 24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northman Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 I think down to earth is pretty close. I am going to guessEagles: 20Vikes: 10HaY! what does the winner get? Just Kidding!= NorthmanPS: I would llke to see Tony Dungy and Paton Manning and the Ind. Colts win the Super Bowl this year!! Since I know from past experience that the vikes are not going to go very far. In order to enjoy continuing to watch Foot Ball after the Vikes are out. I like to root for another team. I picked the colts. So there, darn it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudcutter Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 I may be wrong, but I think the Viks being the 6th seed have no shot of hosting the NFC Title game. If they beat the Eagles, it's either at the Falcons or the Rams,,, both winnable in a dome. Regardless, let's hope were talking a title game in a few days.The Viks got nothing to lose, the pack is outta of it and we put them outta of it!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 I dont think theres anyway we score only 10 points in my opinion. This is going to be about a 23-20 game, dont know which way it will go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psegriz Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 24-17 VikingsLogical reasoning none I just got a funny feeling they'll pull something outta thier a$$. Or do they just call that wishful thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ely Lake Expert Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Quote:Ely lake expert.. What year did you graduate? Are you from Eveleth? I grew up in the Eveleth, Gilbert, Virginia area and actually lived just off of ely lake as very young kid. I'm an 88 grad of Virginia. Kylersek, I would have replied sooner, but I haven't been on for a few days. Yes, I have lived on Ely Lake my whole life. I graduated from Eveleth in 2001. It is suprising how many FM'ers are from or originated in this area.Ryan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canvasback kid Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 21-17 VIKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJR Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Looks like Moe is going to play on 3rd downs. The only vike out is Chavous. Philly has a couple of defensive guys out, there offense has not played in 4 weeks and they have never played without T.O. if the vikes can shut down Westbrook look out! There is no question Philly has played better all year than the vikes but that doesn't matter anymore. If the Vikes can get a lead early and play like they did last week, I say we win easily.I hope Moss gives TO a sack lunch, Moss aint no role model and isn't claiming to be one. Get over it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wadinator Posted January 14, 2005 Share Posted January 14, 2005 Quote:...Moss aint no role model and isn't claiming to be one. Get over it! Your statement is the exact source of the problem.Moss IS a role-model, whether he claims to be or not. My 11 year old worships the ground Moss walks on! And when he was talking about Moss's conversation with the reporter right after the game in which he made the comment "If I get in trouble, I'll take the heat", my 11 year old interpreted that as saying "I don't care if I get in trouble". Those were my 11 year old's exact words at the dinner table last night as we were "discussing" the up coming game. I DON'T WANT MY SON THINKING IT'S OK TO THINK LIKE THAT.So Moss, whether or not you consider yourself a role model or not is irrelevant. You are, and you're not a good one either.And another thing... what were you thinking when you publicly belittled the $10,000 fine from the league on national TV last night? (Did anyone else catch that "home video" footage played on Sport Center last night?) Reminds me of a stupid kid who gets spanked by Mom, then laughs at her because it didn't hurt. Don't you know she's gonna get Dad to dish it out, and its gonna hurt like hell? But if you had simply kept your mouth shut you would have been much better off. Moss's problems with the league are just beginning. My son hasn't seen that footage yet, and I pray he doesn't.He's incredibly gifted, but even more incredibly stupid. Even so, I'll be rooting for the Vikes this weekend, in spite of Randy Moss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts