Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
united jigsticker

Childress makes predication

29 posts in this topic

"They are gonna treat this like a blizting drill, and they're going to be disapointed."

It is now 7-0, and Freotte has been sacked 2 times, hurried 2 times, and 2 punts. Yeah, I bet they are disapointed. Freak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and a 99 yard strike!!!

Great game by the defense! O put up 34, but the D did the job big time. Allen is playing like a monster!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, Gus was horrible! Come and get your crow while it is still warm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gus wasn't just too bad but he will never carry them to the big one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Harvey, he's not a star by any means, but he can carry them to a certain point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We will see in the rest of the remaining games. The Vikes have much tougher teams to play then Chicago. If the Vikes don't play 4 almost perfect games or if Chicago doesn't come apart, Chicago is the divison champ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to KFan this a.m. the Vikes obviously are ahead of the Bears by 1 game but if the Vikes beat Detroit this weekend they will have the tie breakers on Chicago so it is almost like being up 2 games on Chicago. The Vikes do have a tough schedule the rest of the way....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is now 7-0, and Freotte has been sacked 2 times, hurried 2 times, and 2 punts. Yeah, I bet they are disapointed. Freak.

Where'd ya go UJ?

Patience, patience......... grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We will see in the rest of the remaining games. The Vikes have much tougher teams to play then Chicago. If the Vikes don't play 4 almost perfect games or if Chicago doesn't come apart, Chicago is the divison champ.

I'm not sure the schedule is as tough as it looks. Det - scary game as we could be the ones to lose to them... but still; worst team in football. AZ, OVERRATED. Plays in the worst conference in football. Atlanta, decent team but its home, challenging game for us. NY Giants, really tough, but will they have ANY reason to play the last week of the season when home field is long since wrapped up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giants wont be playing for anything

But they will show and play right?

Giants 26 Vikings 12....sorry!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vikes D looked great, I think the D may be able to carry them as long as they run the ball. Chilly should have pulled AP, The guys a monster but why waste talent when being that far ahead? All we need is to lose him to a foolish injury. Man there was some smashing going on in the trenches!

Oh yeah, don't forget to look at the Cheeseheads schedule, if any can run the table in NFC North, it may be them?

ole

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not like last year when they played the starters because they wanted to spoil the Pats chances at 16-0. I if they have home-field wrapped up there is no way that all the starters will be playing, at most a quarter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AZ may be overated but they are a team that we will really struggle with. I don't see the vikes matching up well with boldin/fitz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way to make that matchup work is for a ton of pressure to get put on Warner. He has time to throw the ball on the Vikes, they are toast! Might see a ton of blitzing in that game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope th Williams's dont get suspended for 4 games, that will make it a really tough schedule

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that if it is not done by tuesday there will be no suspensions until next year.. If they even impose anything. Read up on it "starcaps" pills the players had no idea they were not allowed and even the NFL approved them i believe, but now their in trouble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AZ may be overated but they are a team that we will really struggle with. I don't see the vikes matching up well with boldin/fitz

We struggled with them when they were bad, which is every year of that franchises history up until this year. Didn't they eliminate the Vikes from play-off contention 2 seasons in a row under Tice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What they said last night during the game was that the NFL knew a banned substance was in these weight loss pills but it isn't listed on the label and the NFL didn't bother to tell the players it was in there even after they found out. If that's true, you really can't be suspending these players on those facts...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah thats what I thought I heard.. But I didn't get a chance to hear it on TV because I was at the GAME! it was Sweet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rule is pretty simple. The players are responsible for what they put in their bodys!

Suspensions and lawsuits should start tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah thats what I thought I heard.. But I didn't get a chance to hear it on TV because I was at the GAME! it was Sweet!

I don't disagree that they should be held accountable. But if the product that is banned is not listed on the lable are they supposed to go pay and have everything they take tested? If the NFL knew and dind't inform the players then it's on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       

    • Come on Del like any good law we have to pass it to find out what is in it.
    • If you guys (Dave et al) are so "end the war on drugs" you ought to be able to say what that means.  How can you advocate something that you can't, or won't, define?    
    • You dont care about his statements on the 2nd amendment or his ties with radical mooslims as you put it?  
    •   I don't reside in his district and have no power to vote for or against him so I don't spend much of my free time thinking about him.
    •   But your OK with paying for people to sit in prison?   The reason you want to keep drugs criminalized is because they are dangerous, is it not?
  • Our Sponsors