Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Throwing Carp on Shore to Die


Vitreus

Recommended Posts

Today I decided to try a new shore spot, about 15 miles from St. Cloud. I must say that I have never been more disgusted. This dam looked like a nice place to fish, but immediately upon leaving the car, a foul stench arose. I don't have a weak stomach - I've dissected human remains during my education - but I was completely driven from this spot. Dozens of carp strewn along the shoreline, swarming with flies and left to rot. I had to laugh at the irony. In order to make a (tiny) dent in the carp population, fill your fishing spot with that horrible smell and filth? I can see if you plan on disposing of the fish when you leave, but this was the equivalent of $#!^^ing where you eat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing Blanchard dam? That kind of thing makes me sick, never understood why some people think it's ok to leave dead fish to rot in the sun on shore, nothing better than the smell of death stuck in your nose and mouth while fishing sick And what does a guy do when he/she finds a mess like this? Can't throw it in the water, and realy don't want to touch it too much...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That might fall within the purview of Wanton Waste if MN has such a staztute.

People who do stuff like this are too dumb to get out of their own way. I don't suggest anybody be forced to do this, but in much of the world the carp is a food fish and quite a few places in this country too. And smoked carp is pretty danged good.

It ain't king salmon from Deer Harbor....but then what is? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also illegal. there is no limit on rough fish, but it's not a permit to senselessly kill them and litter a public area with decomposing fish.

I know it used to be a lot more common when I was a kid, but you still see it. It's gross.

There's some misconceptions out there that you're actually obligated to not put it back alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the 80's as a wee lad it was illegal to release the carp caught. At the Coon Rapids Dam they had carp disposal shoots. Everyone tossed them on shore to. It stunk and studies showed that it made 0 difference in the overall carp population. The the law was changed in the late 80's early 90's.

Someone is still living in the 80's. Doc called and wants his DeLorean back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the 80's as a wee lad it was illegal to release the carp caught. At the Coon Rapids Dam they had carp disposal shoots. Everyone tossed them on shore to. It stunk and studies showed that it made 0 difference in the overall carp population. The the law was changed in the late 80's early 90's.

Someone is still living in the 80's. Doc called and wants his DeLorean back.

I did a little bit of digging here to see when this law changed... apparently in 1981 MN lifted the law that prohibited anyone from releasing caught carp back to the water.

Interesting history of carp from the NPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been saying it for years but there has to be a way to cook them, that isnt smoking them, to where the mainstream can start taking them home.

They are such a great fight! Why not keep them and prepare them if there is a good way to do so?

However, I do hate seeing so many of them in lakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is for the average consumer, 1 carp goes a long ways. You would have to LOVE your carp recipe better 'n most things to have an average family of four consume even 10 - 10 pounders, which aren't hard to come by.

The problem with reducing them is just the sheer biomass that they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been saying it for years but there has to be a way to cook them, that isnt smoking them, to where the mainstream can start taking them home.

Jewish, German, and Asian folks seemed to have figured out a way.

The scandanavians in this state are really particular about their fish. Namely that it can't taste anything like fish wink

I hear it's really bony and that's another problem. Mainly for folks that are accustomed to boneless fillets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jewish, German, and Asian folks seemed to have figured out a way.

The scandanavians in this state are really particular about their fish. Namely that it can't taste anything like fish wink

That made me laugh. For years I've called walleye the Wonder Bread of the fish world, because it tastes like whatever you put on it. Eaten by itself, might as well be unseasoned lefse. laugh

I've had carp prepared like shore lunch walleye (breaded and fried in oil). It is bony, and God knows we hate our bony fishies, but it tasted good. It's also excellent smoked, as mentioned. When I was a boy in LaCrosse, there was an old guy down the block who would pay us a quarter for a carp, and he'd give us smoked carp whenever we wanted it.

Come to think of it, that was the first money I ever earned from fishing, and I wasn't even 10 years old yet. A quarter in 1969 meant something, and if you could string together enough quarters from carp to reach $2, well, that was like being the king of the world. smile

Pickling them. Hmm. That would be interesting. Worth a try for folks who like pickled fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the volume of carp the bowhunters shoot, I can't imagine there's anyone in the world who could eat that much fish. Shooting only a usable amount also seems to be out of the question, for some reason....if there's a guy out there who goes out, shoots one fish, and then uses it, I haven't met him.

I don't bowhunt, but I have no problem with it. If I were a responsible bowhunter, though, this kind of behavior would drive me nuts....the volume of the problem is such that I wouldn't be surprised if the DNR began to restrict it. Heck, I was walking in the woods in the middle of Crow Wing County a week ago and came upon a huge pile of them. frown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the volume of carp the bowhunters shoot, I can't imagine there's anyone in the world who could eat that much fish.

Many in the U.S. come from different cultures than most of us, and have developed a lifestyle over centuries that utilizes fish on a daily basis. I have no doubt that if people in Minnesota made a concerted effort to catch and clean carp, there'd be thousands who would love to take possession of those "other fish."

It's a matter of communication and respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come to Omaha or Google Joe Tess restaurant - it was on Diners Drive ins and Dives too. They have done fried carp for years, as do many restaurants in NE with Bohemian backgrounds. You just need to make sure you score the fish before frying it so the hot oil can get to the small bones and melt them down. Cold beer and a bottle of lousiana hot sauce and there is no finer eating. Much prefer it over catfish. As for walleye hype I would rather eat a northern than a eye any day - its all about knowing how to filet/clean and prepare. Same goes for Gar and Drum, dont know what your missing.

You MNguys will eat Lutefisk but wont eat carp?!?!?!?!?!?!?! confused

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEangler is right on. I had Carp in the Czech Republic & Hungary & it was great.

See pictures for a nice fish platter we got. It had Carp, Catfish, Pike-Perch(Zander - Euro Walleye cousin) & a whole fish without much meat.

http://imgur.com/a/FlkZc

I was very impressed with how they prepare the fish soups & dishes while on this trip. I am going to cook up some of my own this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line is if it ain't a walleye to some anglers around these parts, it's okay to be a law breaker, and throw the rough fish on the bank. Did I mention it is against the law to throw carp on the bank? It is called wanton waste. Simple. Boneheads, who set a bad example to many, are the ones doing this stuff. Keep 'em and eat'em, or let 'em go. Simple really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line is if it ain't a walleye to some anglers around these parts, it's okay to be a law breaker, and throw the rough fish on the bank. Did I mention it is against the law to throw carp on the bank? It is called wanton waste. Simple. Boneheads, who set a bad example to many, are the ones doing this stuff. Keep 'em and eat'em, or let 'em go. Simple really.
your right, its very simple. let them go
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.