Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

McNabb to the Vikes ?


Jim Almquist

Recommended Posts

Interesting opinion. Can you defend it?

Not much to defend it's just an opinion, Percy would be an animal on a good offensive team with an elite QB. Jennings is an Avg WR with a really good QB that buys time. Percy gets stuck on a stagnant offense that don't even use him properly. Put Percy on the Packers the past 2 years and put Jennings on the Vikings and Percy would have better stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 349
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Other then McNabb having no one to throw to last year, and having some in accuracy issues, his numbers were pretty good. In 12.5 games, he had 3,375 yards. He could have easily broke 4,000 if he wasnt benched. He was a player that wasnt on the coaches good side, and got benched. His completion ratio of 58.3 was a little low, but he also had WR issues as well. The part that hurt him was the int's, which could have had a lot to do with the receivers as well, or the routes.

Yup, he got benched....some accuracy issues.... and his INT's were the rcvrs fault....maybe, just maybe he stunk and the coaches saw that in him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Percy would be an animal on a good offensive team with an elite QB. Jennings is an Avg WR with a really good QB that buys time. Percy gets stuck on a stagnant offense that don't even use him properly. Put Percy on the Packers the past 2 years and put Jennings on the Vikings and Percy would have better stats.

Agreed. Mostly. Your basic premise makes excellent sense. But I think if you put Jennings with Favre during Favre's first Vikes year, he might have done really well. wink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RIVERFISH..YOU SAY MCNABB WILL BE BAD BECAUSE HE HAS NO GREAT RECIEVERS TO THROW TOO IN MINNESOTA.....HE HAS HALL OF FAME TYPE NUMBERS FOR HIS CAREER, WHO WERE HIS GREAT RECIEVERS OF THE PAST? HIS FIRST 4 YEARS HE WAS 12-4 AND 11-5 WITH NO RECIEVERS OVER 700 YARDS-HE FINALLY GOT TERELL OWENS AND THAT WAS IT, NO OTHER HELP.

I get your point, I won't argue wins and losses, but he did have WRs with over 700 yds in those years.

Too bad MN is not getting the D. McNabb from 2000-2004. They are getting an old QB on the downhill of his career. 2 other teams didn't want him but the Vikes will make a star out of him right? wink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the only thing anyone can do is wait and see what happens. Not a single one of you (myself included) knows just what type of year he will have. A LOT of people bagged on Favre the first year he came here, and he had the best year of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the only thing anyone can do is wait and see what happens. Not a single one of you (myself included) knows just what type of year he will have. A LOT of people bagged on Favre the first year he came here, and he had the best year of his career.

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Vikings are terrible, plain and simple.

McNabb is not going to go Favre on the bit and takes us to the NFC title game.

If he does the Vikes will lose, McNabb has a lot of experience losing NFC title games.

McNabb is a washed up loser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm liking this deal the more I hear about. 5 mill, 1 year is a no-briner for veteran QB that Ponder can learn a bit from.

Plus we've had some decent luck with veterans being brought in, Favre and Cunningham to name a few.

what's salt got to do with it? wink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do what you have to do when there is no off season programs. The original plan was to draft Ponder and start him but you can't do that with the lockout lasting as long as it did.

Vikes are gonna do better then alot of people think this season.

As it stands, I find it hard to find more then 6 wins from the schedule. And that would put us in last place in our division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.