creepworm Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 It is going to be Kolb ( who deserves to have a starting job and knows it) that will want out of philly, not Reid trying to get rid of him. Kolb is smart enough to realize he will ride the pine behind Vick and knows he is better than a 2nd stringer.As far as giving up a first rounder for him, it makes a lot of sense. Why wouldn't a team want a starting caliber QB for their first round pick instead of taking a gamble and drafting one. Anyone that pays any attention to football does not have to be told that a vast majority of QB's that are drafted, make nothing of themselves. Therefore, it would take a lot of guesswork out of the equation and we would get someone that would help us next year (which we need) and would not need to be developed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koonie Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 James I said "if" Reid is interested in getting rid of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koonie Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 It is going to be Kolb ( who deserves to have a starting job and knows it) that will want out of philly, not Reid trying to get rid of him. Kolb is smart enough to realize he will ride the pine behind Vick and knows he is better than a 2nd stringer.As far as giving up a first rounder for him, it makes a lot of sense. Why wouldn't a team want a starting caliber QB for their first round pick instead of taking a gamble and drafting one. Anyone that pays any attention to football does not have to be told that a vast majority of QB's that are drafted, make nothing of themselves. Therefore, it would take a lot of guesswork out of the equation and we would get someone that would help us next year (which we need) and would not need to be developed. Giving up a first rounder for kolb is ridiculous!! Have you watched him play at all???? He's worth a 3rd round pick at best. He might be serviceable as a starter but no way in heck is he worth a first rounder. LMAO!!!As far as your bolded statement. Look around the league and tell me where the quarterbacks are coming from. They are getting drafted by one team and staying there. You rarely see a "good" quarterback change teams. You draft your franchise quarterback you don't pluck him from another team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creepworm Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 True, most quarterbacks do stay with the team they are drafted, but I cannot recall another time when a MVP caliber QB comes out of nowhere to step in front of the young franchise QB like what happened in Philadelphia. This is a time when the Vikings could "pluck" a franchise QB from another team, although, it will not come for free. I am just saying the Vikes should go for the sure thing instead of drafting a "hopeful".As far as Kolbs' playHe started 2 games in 2009 and he completed 64% of his passes for 741 yards, 4 touchdowns and 3 interceptionsHe started 4 games this year (had significant time in 3) and completed 63% of his passes for 1,035 yards 6 touchdowns and 4 interceptions.He is averaging over 300 yards and 2 touchdowns per game. That is not bad from a QB. He does have some interceptions but every young QB does. So yes, I have watched him play, I have also looked at the stats and he looks a little more than "serviceable." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatoneguy Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 When you look at kolb's stats you have to remember that they were accumulated in a pass-happy offense with some serious weapons. I am very skeptical that kolb would be anything more than a pedestrian qb for most teams, including mn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFC Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Back to jared. ?Is it easier to get a sack if your up by 20 or down by 20. Their is your answer to Allens season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Back to jared. ?Is it easier to get a sack if your up by 20 or down by 20. Their is your answer to Allens season. Finally....thank you!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greebs Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Back to jared. ?Is it easier to get a sack if your up by 20 or down by 20. Their is your answer to Allens season. that's a good way of looking at it. kind of like cuddyer getting all his big hits when the twins are already up 8 - 2. too bad allen can't get it done when they really need him and he's being single teamed but had no problem commenting about the qback not getting it done a few games ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stcloudangler Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 No, the difference is the other team needs to throw versus run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Jared Allen kicks @ss, he does look a little lighter this year. Lets just cut to the chase, the real reason he's had a down season is because he cut the mullet...period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vman11 Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Is dominated code for married? Ha probably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurpleFloyd Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koonie Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Brees would never have been traded had SD not picked Rivers. Of course they wouldn't have picked Rivers if Eli hadn't been a puke and pouted his way out of SD.Culter wouldn't have been traded except for his coach.Both were traded away under "strange" circumstances.I'll give you Schaub and Cassel. Although Cassel wouldn't have seen the light of day ever if Brady didn't get hurt. I know it can happen but the majority of the upper tier are raised at home so to speak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koonie Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Mcnugget. I like that. lol. I'm praying he doesn't wind up in Minnesota next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 I think Mr. Allen would look pretty good in green and gold. Yeah, trade that loser! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greebs Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 I think Mr. Allen would look pretty good in green and gold. Yeah, trade that loser! ok. pack gets allen; vikes get rodgers. will you take that trade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juneau4 Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Let's see the Pack trades Rogers to the Titans for Moss and the Vikings trade Allen to the Packers for Moss and a 1rst round draft pick from Titans -or a future trade from to be named later. The later draft pick is then traded with Br. Farv. to the Redskins for McNabb.,--Who then goe's to the Titans for Young and the Coach The 2nd round pick of 2015 is than traded to get Chilldres, Green, Tice, and------- To coach in 2011. With a default payement for a new stadium in 2012. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJMOEN Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 ok. pack gets allen; vikes get rodgers. will you take that trade?....Mcnugget. I like that. lol. I'm praying he doesn't wind up in Minnesota next year.I would trade favre, AP, and my left nut for Rodgers....and as far as mcnugget goes, I almost cried when I heard they benched him, we have a history of picking up old, washed up, and interception prone Qbs...i know mcnabb has a low interception rate but still. 3rd JA is the man. Has he had as good as season as the last? No. Should we trade him H NO! Mckinney looks like an alzheimers patient lost at the mall, where am I? why is this guy pushing me?!? 4th? Dog-beating aside why in God's name did we not try for vick? I want a Qb, im not asking him to babysit, or watch my dogs on vacation!!!! 5-19 Childress!! Thank God he's gone Timecode of post should explain the length and spelling;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 I'd keep AP and my nut. Rodgers is good though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurpleFloyd Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 Brees would never have been traded had SD not picked Rivers. Of course they wouldn't have picked Rivers if Eli hadn't been a puke and pouted his way out of SD.Culter wouldn't have been traded except for his coach.Both were traded away under "strange" circumstances.I'll give you Schaub and Cassel. Although Cassel wouldn't have seen the light of day ever if Brady didn't get hurt. I know it can happen but the majority of the upper tier are raised at home so to speak. Dan Diego was going to pick Eli Manning but he boycotted and forced the trade to New York. So they would have certainly picked someone. The reason they let him go is he had a shoulder procedure and they gambled that he might not be the same QB after that.I am not sure what you are getting to with the rest of the post. Yes, it is usually a strange situation that sends a great player to another team but it happens. We ended up with Jared Allen due to such a circumstance and we similarly lost Moss due to a strange situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Looks like Allen is playing better in his last games since Chilly is gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Cloud Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 I wouldnt say Allen is a loser but he did get put on a throne, maybe even "god" status by many delusional queens fans.He's good but thats all he has proven so far... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Allen dominates, check the stats of all DE's in the past handful of years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted December 30, 2010 Share Posted December 30, 2010 The Top Seven Defensive Ends in the NFL Coming into the '10 SeasonSome would say that I am picking Allen because he is becoming sort of a celebrity, but I have never really been one of those guys who follows suit with the popularity contest.All I need to back up my pick is...well...in six seasons, he has had 72 sacks. The last THREE seasons he has had a total of 44 sacks. The years went as follows:15.5 sacks14.5 sacks14.5 sacksNow, if those are not worthy of being at the helm of the No. 1 spot, then I have no idea what is.Along with all of the sacks, he has also been one of the best defensive ends for tackling. He has had seasons with 77, 64, and 55 tackles, with a nice solo:assisted ratio as well.He seems to get a large number of forced fumbles as well with 21 over the past five seasons.Overall, it's very easy for me to say he's the best in the NFL today.62 tackles (54 solo), four forced fumbles, one interception, and lastly 15.5 sacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surface Tension Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 What those stats don't tell is Allen did not get pressure on the QB this year and he was not double covered.Previous years he pulled those stats being double covered and got to the QB a lot more often. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.