Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
IFallsRon

40 games, 20 wins

37 posts in this topic

No one expected the Central to suck but I'll take the Twins at .500 after 40 games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

500 is definately nice, but it certainly stinks to be 500 when you were 3 games over with the Jays coming to town.

I have a feeling its going to be a year of many ups and downs...i just hope these young guys start learning the twins ways.

FUNDAMENTAL BASEBALL!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.500 is nice to see, but the Twins are still the Twins and are still under the same ownership. I wouldn't expect too much more out of them than this.

JMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Bass. I listened to a radio show the other day and the talk was about the Twins. They all agreed that the Twins will more than likely slip in the standings. They have suprised us all or maybe the rest of the division has been less than wonderful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a young team with a lot of potential. There will be many ups and downs. I think we need to be patient (I know, it's tough) and enjoy watching these young guys grow up on the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason were are in it AGAIN is because of our OWNER and business model.

Go Twins!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason were are in it AGAIN is because of our OWNER and business model.

Go Twins!

The reason we aren't considered a better team is because of our ownership. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... watching this past week, I woulda thought maybe it was due to the dumb mistakes made on the field... mad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, what a tough couple series for the Twins. 1-5 vs. the Blue Jays and the Rockies?? Ouch...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's face it. Everyone who gets paid to predict such things thought the Twins would be about a .500 team. No one expected the rest of the division to play to our level. Hard to believe the season will end that way. Young, inexperienced teams that aren't familiar with each other will have ups and downs. Those ups and downs means they may have moderate winning streaks and losing streaks.

If the Twins can finish at or above .500 and show some signs of coming together as a team throughout the year, it will bode well for next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant tell, but hopefully pier bridge is kidding.

Not in anyway shape or form whatsoever!

So for the millionth time who's team or owner would you like to have?

Boston? with 2 World series in 100 years?

Yankees's doing real a good again this year ROTFLMAO "see devil rays payroll"

Detroit maybe? spend and you win.......NOT!

Go Twins!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cheapness of management/ownership is sparing us to death. It's been reported that the attendance is down over 60,000 from last year when the team really was biting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any clue as to how many Iron Rangers, Duluthians, or other out-staters are just not coming into the Cities for a Twins game at $3.75/gal for gas, plus other expenses?? You can't blame the owner for the economy, or at least directly blame him.

That just could be a reason attendance is down, not the play of the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Boston? with 2 World series in 100 years?

Boston won in 2004 and 2007, so I would go with 2 in the past 4 years...

I would believe that winning it all is the ultimate goal of any team, and I just can't see the Twins doing it with the 24th ranked payroll in all of baseball. I would love it if they would prove me wrong though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Twins a putting up a fight tonight. They have had there chances, just not shutting the door. 6-6 in top of 12th!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And we pulled it off! Thanks to a couple unlikely heroes. Thank you Bobby Korecky and Howie Clark!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if Juan Rincon will make the all-star team?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our "Big Stick" Morneau really let us down last night. Twice, all he had to do was put the ball in play and we win the game. All he did was look at cookies and swing for the fence. What was that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about Cuddy. This guy has really stepped up his game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pohlad may not be a big spender compared to some other teams but there was an article I read last week that had an interesting look at team salaries. In the last 10 years or so (I don't remember the exact time frame) the Twins payroll is up 350%. It is by far the largest increase in the majors over that time. It may not make him a big spender but it also shows he is not constantly slashing payroll. By the way, that increase is about 3 times what the average players salary had done in the same period.

The Twins and Oakland have proven you can consistently compete without spending crazy money. I think the Yankees, Seattle, Mets, Dodgers, Red Sox, and Cubs have proven that spending money on a bunch of big names doesn't guarantee success either. Every year there is a mix of big money and little money in the playoffs. Big money doesn't win all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The teams are in order of their payroll. The first number is their order in relation to their standings.

24, 1. New York Yankees $209,081,579 $6,744,567

26, 2. Detroit Tigers $138,685,197 $4,622,840

14, 3. New York Mets $138,293,378 $4,609,779

3, 4. Boston Red Sox $133,440,037 $4,765,716

9, 5. Chicago White Sox $121,152,667 $4,487,136

5, 6. Los Angeles Angels $119,216,333 $4,110,908

2, 7. Chicago Cubs $118,595,833 $4,392,438

12, 8. Los Angeles Dodgers $118,536,038 $4,233,430

27, 9. Seattle Mariners $117,993,982 $4,538,230

11, 10. Atlanta Braves $102,424,018 $3,414,134

7, 11. St. Louis Cardinals $100,624,450 $3,049,226

17, 12. Toronto Blue Jays $98,641,957 $3,522,927

13, 13. Philadelphia Phillies $98,269,881 $3,388,617

8, 14. Houston Astros $88,930,415 $3,293,719

20, 15. Milwaukee Brewers $81,004,167 $2,793,247

18, 16. Cleveland Indians $78,970,067 $3,037,310

29, 17. San Francisco Giants $76,904,500 $2,651,879

23, 18. Cincinnati Reds $74,277,695 $2,971,108

30, 19. San Diego Padres $73,677,617 $2,376,697

28, 20. Colorado Rockies $68,655,500 $2,640,596

19, 21. Texas Rangers $68,239,551 $2,353,088

10, 22. Baltimore Orioles $67,196,248 $2,099,883

1, 23. Arizona Diamondbacks $66,202,713 $2,364,383

15, 24. Minnesota Twins $62,182,767 $2,487,311

22, 25. Kansas City Royals $58,245,500 $2,240,212

25, 26. Washington Nationals $54,961,000 $1,895,207

21, 27. Pittsburgh Pirates $49,365,283 $1,898,665

16, 28. Oakland Athletics $47,967,126 $1,713,112

4, 29. Tampa Bay Rays $43,820,598 $1,460,687

6, 30. Florida Marlins $21,836,500 $661,712

It appears that having a smaller salary is working out for teams like Florida, Tampa Bay, Oakland, Minnesota, Arizona, and Baltimore. Sure its early but the twins are competitive and have been the last few years doing it their way!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Windy better not bust my chops anymore based on that list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for posting that tisosy. Very interesting to say the least.

IMO, I believe that the players that aren't getting paid as much bond better together and play better as a team. They are all busting their rear-ends for the good of the TEAM and not themselves. I LOVE to see the Yankees at 24th with the highest payroll...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its still early show me the salary stat at the end of the year

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • If you consider the "thugs" as part of the protest group (which DC police even said they weren't, but only intended to do damage) then the answer is yes. The labeling of all because of the actions of a few is something I have and always will disagree with.
    • I clearly stated protest marches and not specifically the womens march. So,knowing that do you still disagree with me?
    • No where yesterday during the woman's march was there violence or racism exhibited. Intolerant towards things Trump wishes to eliminate yes. The damage by vandals occurred on Friday by a group of thugs who had only one purpose in mind and that was to destroy property and create trouble during the inauguration. (DC police even said that and they expected it.) Yes the Woman March did leave garbage to clean up, which can be expected. If you have ever had the experience of cleaning a (female) public restroom you would find out they have a problem with garbage cans. I'm sure most did take their signs with them in the same manner most ice-fisherman take their garbage off the lake with them, but there are some who don't. The top photo is the only one that is of the Woman March.   
    • Can you explain why you feel that way?    
    • I do believe you are out of line with the racist, intolerant, vandals comment.
    • I will slow it down. I did not say you said it was rigged. Your party,however went after Trump for not saying he would accept the election results and then turned around and in large numbers proclaimed they didn't accept the results. I don't expect you to understand the hypocrisy of that but at the same time it's there.   Conjecture. You don't have a single slice of evidence this is the case and you would be wise to retract it because it has no basis. None. Yet even though this is the sort of thing your party is outraged about by the right, you are actually more extreme about it on your side.    While there is direct evidence that the DNC blatantly rigged the Democrat primary in favor of Hillary and committed all manner of things that came out in the Podesta/DNC emails there was no outrage on your side over what they did. Yet you jump on Trump for something that was sold as truth when it was literally the same fake news the Dems have been pushing all cycle.    Considering the contributions that flowed into the Clinton campaign coffers in all manners it would be best to leave that sleeping dog lie.    In the meantime. you might want to take ownership of the mess that the racist, intolerant, vandals that made up the protest marches because you own that.    
    • i always thought they were about identical smoked  
    • Rumor has it they are running a story next week regarding ice fishing and CO. 
    • Looks like one to me. Nice catch  
    • I thought you lefties were against fake news.   Guess not so much anymore.   At least you haven't attacked Barron Trump, yet, unlike your fellow travelers. 
  • Our Sponsors