bassmann77 Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 A new Michigan State Record. Field and Stream has the story on their HSOforum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooter Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Sweet, different pics from what I saw. What a flippin horse. Rumored to be 5lbs heavier when the DNR tagged it in the spring! Amazing coloration on that fish - wonder if the fins were reddish when he caught it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
50inchpig Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 yeah that is one pretty fish, i think the fins are red like that all the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10,000 Casts Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Anyone have the length and girth of that fish? I saw that it was 50lbs 8oz but no measurements. What a hog!In the pic on the bottom, it looks bigger than the Louis Spray Muskie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishuhalik Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 holy bawls!!!! ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmusky Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Anyone have the length and girth of that fish? I saw that it was 50lbs 8oz but no measurements. What a hog! In the pic on the bottom, it looks bigger than the Louis Spray Muskie... It probably was, it just didn't have all the extra sand wieght Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBuck Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 That is a gorgeous specimen. Color is incredible. I'd love to know the measurements on that freak. I heard he caught it on a quick-strike rig hooked up to a cat? Just kiddin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotPocket Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 WOW!! Nice looking fish! What would you think having that thing coming boat side! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muskieboy46 Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 The article said it was 55inches (page 3).http://www.fieldandstream.com/photos/gal...ught-torch-lake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 I heard about the fish elsewhere, but something about those pics just don't look right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLnick87 Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 i agree! on the top one the guy towards the tail looks like he is holding no weight at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pondwater Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 I agree something about the pics just look fishy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 well I'm not saying it's fake, because from what I can tell from the F&S site everything is legit.It just looks strange....maybe the pink fins are throwing me for a loop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DHanson Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 It's a legit fish and record. It's been old news for well over a week now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muskieboy46 Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 You guys are too funny. An officially weighed muskie with multiple good pics, and yet you guys still arn't satisfied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunterjoe Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 And to think I never started fishing muskies until I moved away from Michigan. Guess I should have started earlier. Those fish out there definitely have some awesome color in them. I've caught a few, and they are all very nice looking fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoffer Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Yeah I think the pics look kind of weird too - but maybe just because the size of that fish is so big. I can sure see why there is so much scrutiny regarding the world record fish and the disputes that surround the various records...the pic of this fish sure looks like it could rival any of the world record fish pics out there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Kuhn Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Yep, weighed on 4 different certified scales, and a fish that was tagged by the dnr earlier this year at the same length. From the sounds of it the color is due to where it was caught, in a very deep and clear lake, >300 feet deep IIRC. It is also a great lakes strain fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no_bod Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 You guys are too funny. An officially weighed muskie with multiple good pics, and yet you guys still arn't satisfied. I agree muskieboy. It use to be that if you didn't have a picture of a fish that you caught, no one would believe it (this still happens). Now, when a legit picture and official weight are taken, it is still being criticized. What more do some of you folks want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn Kellett Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 It looks weird to many of you because:1. It's a great lakes strain fish. They have different coloration then the ones around here.and 2. It's dead. The only fish pics most of us even see anymore are from live fish. There is a HUGE difference! Personally I like the pics of the live ones best... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 I think you are right Shawn.I love looking at big fish pictures, and really don’t care the size, but this one just stood out as being unique as far as the fish’s appearance. Almost looks cartoonish to me.Don’t confuse that with being negative or not believing it’s real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban cowboy Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bronzeback Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 haha, I doubt he's that short. The fish is a good 12 inches closer to the camera. And if the camera is above them at all it will skew the length even more. Huge fish. awesome color. Would love to see a 55 sometime in my life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban cowboy Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Ya, I hope to boat a 55 some day as well. That fish is a real trophy.... so pretty. WOW like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mainbutter Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 You guys are too funny. An officially weighed muskie with multiple good pics, and yet you guys still arn't satisfied. lol I was thinking the same thing.The only reason the photos look a little fishy is because there's a BIG FISH in 'em! They might look a bit odd, because I mean really, how often do we actually get to see NEW, GOOD pictures of a new state record musky, or anything even close??That is the prettiest musky, and prettiest picture of a musky I've ever seen a picture of. They really lucked out on a nice sunny day to catch those colors. It's sure going to make a beautiful mount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now