basssmasher* Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 T-jack will not be the starter.. You dont sign a guy to be a backup at 3.mill a yr like they did sage.. They say there will be a qb battle in camp, but truthfully there wont be.. sage will be your starter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 John Clayton from ESPN predicts TJack will be the Vikes starter if Favre doesn't sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slowhand Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 John Clayton from ESPN predicts TJack will be the Vikes starter if Favre doesn't sign. How in the heck can Beeker Clayton predict who the opening day starter is going to be when they havent even thought about packing for training camp. Beeker must be having a slow news day to report "breaking" stories like that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He said it was from several sources who claim Chilly is still in love with TJack and wants to prove everyone wrong with his pick of a few years ago. God, I hope we sign Favre!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 JUNKSON will be dust in the wind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Supposedly the Vikings want an answer by the end of the week on what Favre is going to do. Good luck with that!If I was Chilly looking at the QB's currently on the roster I wouldn't be pushing the issue real hard. In fact, I'd take Favre with open arms a day before the season started just so I wouldn't have to throw another season away with horrible options such as Jackson or Rosenfels! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted May 25, 2009 Author Share Posted May 25, 2009 Maybe they want an answer now, so they can still have a chance to trade and sign a real QB yet this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandmannd Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Na, that's Chilly bet Chilly, he's pig headed. Fine with me, don't want Favre anyway. I'm kinda hoping he will go with T-Junk, then they can both go bu-bye at the end of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slowhand Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Problem with that is that is that many more miles put on Petersons odometer while trying to carry T-Jack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandmannd Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 I hear you on that. But we have to get rid of Chilly and T-Junk before we either a)loose Peterson or b)turn him into the next Barry Sanders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpitnArgueDuckClub* Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 Favre IS THE ANSWER this year!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRULEDRIFTER Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 BOOTY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koonie Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 If you want booty you're going to have to make a phone call. Booty won't see the field unless Sage and tjack both get hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 i'd rather see what booty has to offer then tjack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyehunter Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Booty has nothing to offer other than his big USC attitude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandmannd Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Why are so many on the booty bandwagon? We haven't seen anything from this kid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianLucky13 Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Are people getting on the Booty bandwagon cuz of the Vikings Linebacker that said good things about him on KFarve?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishinphilth Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Why are so many on the booty bandwagon? We haven't seen anything from this kid Because we have seen what T-jack can do and Booty cant be much worse? Can he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandmannd Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 I get that, I just don't think he's the one to take the team deep in the playoffs yet. Maybe down the road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Uran Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 I'll give it to Bruledrifter, he's been saying BOOTY for like a year now, with where are team is right now, we don't have time to try and develop someone who hasn't taken any meaningful snaps in the NFL. We need a QB who has some experience, it's that simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishinphilth Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 T-jack and Sage have experience, but they are not what we need. We may go 10-6, 11-5 or what have you and there is no way either one of them will take the next step and bring the viks deep into the playoffs. Hopefully next Janurary I am eating some crow, but I have a good feeling that I wont be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRULEDRIFTER Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 I call for Booty only because it's something new. Obviously, T-Jack isn't working..... Sage Rosenfels???? Are you flippin kidding me? I'm completely against any thought of Fav-Rah! I don't care what he's done, it doesn't change the fact he's a Green Bay Packer for life and I guess I still have a little home town pride left in me. The last thing I want to hear is a Packer fan gloat about how it took Fav-Rah to lead us to the Bowl, ect.... (Not that I even believe he would anyway due to the fact he's DONE!!! WASHED UP! RETIRE D@m it!) At best, he would get us to the playoffs and we would lose anyway, we can do that with any of the other bums we have thowing the ball, even BOOTY!!!!!! We should have jumped on Cassell, or Cutler.. or an even better idea was we should have kept Thigpen, or done more to get him back after KC got Cassell. Childress is a joke and our team will reflect that as long as he is our coach! (I will gladly enjoy that crow if I am wrong! However, I also believe I am not) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walleyes12 Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 My guess is Booty won't even be on the team at the start of the season! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Uran Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Who knows what will happen between now and preseason... What I do know is that the Vikes will win the division no matter who is taking the snaps... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianLucky13 Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Who knows what will happen between now and preseason... What I do know is that the Vikes will win the division no matter who is taking the snaps... NO!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.