Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
leech~~

Update: About 48 people Rescued on Red Lake

11 posts in this topic

UPPER RED LAKE, Minn. (Valley News Live) - Latest Update:

The Beltrami County Sheriff's Office is reporting that about 48-50 people were fishing with portable ice houses on the east side of Upper Red Lake.

The wind and the poor conditions of the ice caused existing cracks to widen and and chunks of ice broke free.

Responding to the scene were Kelliher Fire with their rescue equipment, Blackduck Ambulance, Beltrami County Sheriff's Deputies, Minnesota DNR officers and the Bemidji Fire Department, along with resort owners

 

 

The Beltrami County Sheriff's Office advises at this time no one should be on the ice due to the dangerous winds and fissures throughout the area.

We attached a satellite photo to this story which shows that the majority of the Upper Red Lake is open.

According to the Beltrami County Sheriff's Office as of 12:33 PM there are no stranded people left on the lake.

Original Story:

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) says that everyone is off of the ice and safe after a rescue Monday morning on Red Lake.

Lt. Phil Seefeldt with the DNR says his department, along with fire crews, rescued dozens of people stuck on a sheet of ice that broke away from the shore.

An airboat was being sent to the lake to assist in the rescue. No word on exactly how many people were being rescued.

Lt. Znajda with the DNR said, luckily, the wind shifted and the sheet of ice began drifting back toward the shore.

"It's my understanding that most are getting off the ice now," Lt. Znajda told Valley News Live a little after 11:00 a.m. Monday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand being antsy to get out and enjoy your favorite pastime, but how dumb are we to risk life and limb, as well as those of potential rescuers, never mind the cost, just to be in a hurry to put some panfish on ice?  I've never understood this.  Like sitting in a tree stand without a safety harness, or many other things we do and choosing not to be safe about it.  Think of your loved ones, maybe don't put them through this.

colt44, 556LaGue and elkrivermn like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had 2 buddies up there Friday/Sat/Sun and they reported good ice for walking and good fishing, sorry to see people getting caught by weather.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drove by Sunday around noon and there were 300 or so out there - and it appeared more were headed that way with shelters in the back of trucks.  Wind was out of the NE, which would have pushed the ice out from the east shore.  Today's winds were out of the NW.  Go figure.  Glad to hear they were safely rescued.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the "winter" we are having there's just no reason to head out. I don't know what it's been that far north as I haven't been checking the weather up there but I sure wouldn't feel safe on ice. Weather's been in the 50's. Even when it's in the 30's it's not making real good quality ice. As a first responder, I'll go out and rescue people whenever a call comes in. However, I have to ask people to please think before you go out. First, your life is NOT replaceable. Nothing, no fish, is worth risking your life for. Second, I'm sure all of you have family. Think of them. They will be missing a son, daughter, sister, brother, husband, wife, or worse, father or mother. Is it really worth that? Now when you go through and call goes out for help you are risking the lives of the first responders. Yes we train and we have gear to get out and help but that doesn't give us a 100% guarantee we are going to make it. We didn't ask to go on that ice, but we gladly do it because that's the life we chose. So we put our lives on the line because of something you chose to do. 

So was the possibility of a fish in the pan with risking your one life? What you mean to your family? The lives of those coming out to help you? 

elkrivermn likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious. What is the determining factor for when the cost is imposed upon those being rescued or treated? 

  • If one's home catches fire, who pays for the cost of the emergency response?
  • How about a automobile accident? Who is responsible for the cost of the response teams (police, ambulance, towing, etc.)?
  • If I drop my truck through the ice, I believe the cost of retrieving will be mine, correct?
  • What if I fall through the ice? Who pays for the cost of the response teams (rescue, ambulance, etc.)?
  • When a tornado strikes, who pays the cost for the response teams?

I think you get my drift. Just curious about what the cut-off is. Any thoughts?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't deal with the cost. However, I believe all but the cost of retrieving your vehicle through the ice is covered by emergency response. It's built into your taxes. We are paid by tax dollars. So when we are called it's tax dollars at work. 90% of fire departments in MN are volunteer (paid on call) and most don't make much. We don't do it for the money anyway. There are no cut offs for saving lives. That being said, when you go out and there is an illegal burn (burning something without pulling a permit) you run the risk of being fined. You can be charged per vehicle used and per firefighter on the scene. I'm sure there's other situations where this can play a role but I haven't seen them yet. For instance, if police or continually called out for something that isn't really anything they could possibly charge. I doubt that happens much though. Most agencies are happy to answer a call to help no matter what. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been doing a little digging and did find an article from USA Today about a rescue on Lake Erie. The article included the following statements. I don't know about Minnesota but other information I found seem to suggest that there are some changes being made in some states and it can vary from state to state. Some adopt rules that require determining if the "victims" took unnecessary risk or something to that effect but this raises some questions about judgement too. There are other concerns that when people fear the cost of rescue they would actually avoid rescue even when their life was in serious jeapardy. Supposedly this has been the case at times.

When the rescued fishermen made it to shore, authorities had them line up single-file to take down their names, Hasty said. "So if we got caught on the ice again, they would charge us a fine for being out there under those conditions," he explained.

Well, I don't want to hijack this thread any more than I already have. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Though I think its ridiculous to push the envelope on early ice, by the sounds of it from some guys who were actually caught yesterday, it is being a bit blown out of proportion.

They weren't "rescued". They were monitored as they walked safely across a crack. From what I have read, no one was actually airboated or anything like that to safety. They all left under their own power on foot.

leechlake likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   No expert here either but I've talked to a couple.    Would your new, expanded slab be conducive to making the addition another zone or zones?  You could maybe run that expansion off different lines from the manifold above the slab so you don't have to route and pour over seams.   Definitely insulate below with GOOD insulation.  As mentioned, heat doesn't really rise the way we think it does; it moves to the cold and the earth will soak it up.   Heating your loop would be cheapest with a natural gas fired boiler, propane second.  Geothermal is expensive to put in so your payback on a new system is long.  Air source heat pumps are great until it gets really cold.  In the end, radiant in floor is the most efficient way to heat, but yes, it's slow to respond.  But if your toes are warm, you will be too.
    • I appreciate the response, I take nothing personally and didn't mean to be snippy in my reply. There are a lot of great comments on here and I will keep you posted on what I decide. Thanks again. 
    • Ice is quickly thinning on those northern lakes that still have ice with dangerous conditions on most lakes. The Wisconsin River is now open even in its northern stretches, but ice chucks can be seen melting along the river's edge. The lower Wisconsin River has finally dropped to near normal levels. Some walleye and brown trout are being caught on the Menominee River both trolling and angling from shore. Low water and cool water temperatures slowed the walleye run so far on the Oconto River. Anglers along the Wolf River have been starting to catch walleyes. A few sturgeon have been seen along the Wolf River, but warmer temperatures are needed for the sturgeon to start their annual spring spawning run. Walleye and sauger action on the Wisconsin River and Lake Wisconsin is slowly picking up.The steelhead season opened on the lower stretch of the Brule River last weekend and anglers reported good successPhoto Credit: DNRSpring steelhead fishing opened last Saturday for the lower stretch of the Brule River and there were lots of fishermen and fisherwomen on the river many who had a successful opener. .
    • I apologize if that came out wrong. The idea might very well be the best route to go. It's just that over the past 25 years or so I have seen many attempts to save a dollar that cost a buck and a half to do lol.    Here are my two cents. If you have a slab and you want to pour on top of it while keeping the same footprint that sounds pretty doable and could probably save some money if you don't have to change drain lines, run water, heat runs, electrical etc into the slab.   If you intend to tie into the existing slab and run zones of pex across the joint and have the new and old floors end up at the same elevation it still can be done. Some contractors will not want to mess with tying into and raising the elevation of the slabs and will prefer to start from scratch especially if you as the homeowner want them to warranty the finished product.  The critical thing would be to use enough rebar drilled into the old slab and have enough compaction and sufficient footings to make sure the slabs stay where they are without settling. That would make all kinds of problems with the pex.    Hopefully that response came across better.
    • It'll be interesting to see if the team plays a little harder in front of a different goalie. 
    • Hawg, I'm with you on this one !
    • Check and see if you have a video output on you device. You may be able to record to a digital device.
    • Just use plain old spray paint in a can. I've done it many many times and seems to stick really nice. Nothing special either I can't even tell you the brand because I have no clue. But as mentioned doing 2-3 light coats helps.
    • no expert here, but heat doesn't rise. heat radiates in the direction of least resistance (R value). warm air or water rises because it is less dense than colder air or water.  If you don't insulate you will be heating the ground under your cabin and the earth is a very large heat sink $$$. get some info from an expert in the radiant field as far as tube diameter, spacing, water temp, manifolds, length of runs, and so on. it varies on amount of windows (solar) ceiling height and room type (bed, bath, living area,  storage etc.). once you pour over the tubing you get to live with it. I did my own Home 15 years ago and got some good advise (wish I would have taken it all)
    • Sonar works from above, cameras need to be submerged. What am I missing here?
  • Our Sponsors