• RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
AndyM

? on basket racks

Recommended Posts

I shot a 8 point basket rack deer on Saturday. Big body, starting to go gray in places. My question is, Why don't the antlers get bigger than what they did? I shot the same size deer 3 years ago and we estimated it at 4 years old. Is this in genetics or not the right nutrition for larger racks? People at work tell me to let them walk so the rack grows larger, but the racks are staying the same size. There are larger racked deer in the area but these basket racks are much more abundent. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess would be that you are way over-estimating the age of your deer. All deer have different potential for antler size and nutrition and other factors also play a part, but very few deer will still be only "basket" racks when they are 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 years old. Some graying does not necessarily mean the deer is old. You can tell better by looking at its teeth. Also a 2 1/2 year old deer will seem very big when you have to drag it out, especially when you compare it to does, fawns, and 1 1/2 year old bucks.

I would also guess that those few larger racked deer in the area are the ones that actually are 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 years old. This is the same as most areas. Since there are more 1-2 year old bucks than 3+ year old bucks, there are more basket racks than trophies.

With that said, if your happy with the buck you shot, tell the guys at work to kiss your @#$ if they give you grief about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think people would be surprised how old deer really are in a lot of cases.

Without age, nothing will grow bigger racks.

Andy,

did you weigh this deer? You state its a big body.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will look at the teeth and weigh it tomorrow, before I start butchering it. I will post them when I find out. I'll post pics when I get them as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy,

I already posted, but after looking through the results thread I saw many others stating something similar, "Small horns and a big body, must be bad genetics." If most of these people put their deer in the back of their truck and pulled into a registration station next to a guy that had shot a trophy buck, they would be quite suprised. I'll guaranty that 95% of the time that trophy buck will be huge in body size compared to their buck. That is why it is easy to call a fork horn a big bodied deer when it is hanging next to a fawn and a yearling doe, but not so easy when it is hanging next to a 3 1/2 year old trophy.

Congrats on your buck though. All I saw was fawns and does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to point out the exact same thing fetzer. I have seen several posts recently about "old bucks with small racks".

In the end, if the hunter is happy, thats all the counts really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also agree that if the hunter is happy with what he has harvested, that is all that matters. It does drive me absolutely crazy when people think they are helping the genetics of the deer when they shoot basket racks. I would guess that 98% of "basket racks" are 1 and a half and MAYBE two and a half years of age. I also have a buddy that shot a very obvious 1 and a half year old buck that did have a little grey on his head and stated it was a "very old buck with bad genetics." Genetics are soooo overrated around here it is ridiculous. If you let ANY buck get to even 3 and a half years old around here you have a very nice buck that has a big set of antlers. There are so few that get to that age. Now if you are happy with a basket racked buck that is just fine with me, but I hate it when that same guy complains that "there aren't any big bucks around here because of bad genetics."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya I would bet its not old too. Its amazing how much bigger a buck's body is than any doe, even a 1 1/2 year old buck looks big on the hoof if its only been yearilngs you've been seeing, but put them next to a 3 1/2 year old buck and they'll be runts.

Obviously none of us have seen the buck yet so we are only guessing, but I'm going with youth instead of food or genetics...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading these posts I myself am anxious to see the age of the deer. If you all are right and it is only at most 2 1/2 yrs old then I will be talking to quite a few people and ask them to pass on these deer. I would love to take more like I took a couple years ago. I know some will and some won't pass on this size deer but some is better than none.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if most hunters started believing that almost all basket racks are very young bucks and started passing on them you would see a surprising number of bigger(antlered and bodied) bucks in as short a time as the next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was bowhunting friday night and a nice buck came out of the woods, I didn't have a shot at it because it was on my right and th was a limb in the way so I couldn't draw on anything to my right. Anyhow, he was a great looking deer, probably a real trophy by most people's standards, I know that I was very willing to shoot at it if the shot presented itself. Anyhow, I thought it was the big one that I had been seeing but after further thought, realized that it just couldn't be the deer I was after. It was confirmed about 45 minutes later when the bigger buck appeared in the same spot, (still no shot). Let me tell you, he made the first buck look small, not just rack size, but body size too. He literally looked like an angus trotting away from me. I was amazed at the difference in body size in bucks between probably a 3 year old deer and a 5-6 year old deer. Put the big guy next to your biggest doe and she will still look small. There is lots of variation in size, but I too would be willing to say your deer was only a couple of years old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if most hunters started believing that almost all basket racks are very young bucks and started passing on them you would see a surprising number of bigger(antlered and bodied) bucks in as short a time as the next year.

You couldn't be more right. Compare trail cam pics of a 2.5 y/o to when he is 3.5, it's amazing how much growth they can put on during that "puberty" stage. If that 3.5 is given the chance to live and he makes it to 4.5 or 5.5, MN would have some decent big buck hunting in a few years but let's not hash over the QDM debate again. grin

Hows about a picture of the deer in question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a science to aging a deer by the teeth. tell by number of teeth, molars more than anything, and the amount of wear on the sharp ridges of the molars. the more wear, the more teeth, the more years the deer has been around

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure by 2 1/2 years old... a deer will have a full set of teeth. After that, checking for wear on the cusps and overall signs of aging is about all one can do other than to send in a cross-sectional.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Now if you are happy with a basket racked buck that is just fine with me, but I hate it when that same guy complains that "there aren't any big bucks around here because of bad genetics."

very true, its annoying. crazy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aging your deer, here is a short little how to. at least to age them between a Fawn(this years), yearling (1 1/2 yrs), or adult (2 1/2 yrs). The way to do this is to look at the 3rd molar back on the jaw bone, you will have to cut the cheek back a little bit to get a look at it..If the tooth has 3 cusps (points on the tooth) and they are sharp and "pointy" = You have a FAWN....If the that 3rd molar still has 3 cusps but that tooth is worn down a lot, sometimes almost flush with the gum line = you have a YEARLING.......If that third molar has 2 cusps = You have a 2 1/2 year old deer or older....Hope this makes sense, Im sure if a guy wanted to you could google tooth wear and replacment and you could get some pics- good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deer are like people..... some are are old and gray, some but few are young and gray, MANY are young and FAT, Most are old and fat. Nothing is for sure, but they all have their own personalities and body characteristics. I know WAY too many people overestimate the age of their deer. Big body, gray face, with a small, pencil-thin rack is a 1 1/2 year old buck 95% of the time! You can look to see if the deer is a 1 1/2 or 2 1/2 by checking if the 3rd premolar is a tricuspid or bicuspid.... but beyond that its very debatable!

Weve found many, many sheds from a 9 1/2 year old buck that we eventually found dead. For fun I brought the jaw to the DNR.... they aged him at 3 1/2! Ive lost all confidence in the "tooth wear" aging since then. It just varies too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a general estimate I go by a combination weight/rack. Most 3.5 year old bucks (where I hunt in So MN) should dress out around 200 lbs. give or take.

For a really old deer I look at the face, but not the color. Old bucks begin to develop the Roman nose. Basically the nose becomes more full and goes up between the eyes and nose. A younger deer will slope down. I don't think they get a roman nose until they are about 6.5 years old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I first found his sheds in 1996 He was 2 1/2 at a minimum then, I think 3 1/2. I then found him dead in the winter of 2003.

How can you be 100% sure that the deer you found dead in 2003 is the same deer you found sheds off of in 1996?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Heavy rains across northwestern Wisconsin last weekend and early this week have flooded some roads and caused washouts on some highways, roads, state parks, forests and trails. According to the National Weather Service the area has received 7 to 12 inches of rain from Friday through Monday.Several park system property or portions of properties are closed due flooding. Amnicon Falls State Park, closed temporarily but has reopened, though some roads, trails and observation areas remain closed. Pattison State Park is open for camping only; all trails, observation areas, picnic and day-use areas are closed. There are washouts on the dam that forms Interfalls Lake and Highway 35 over the dam is closed. A campground and horse trail are closed at Governor Knowles State Forest and the day use areas along the river at Interstate Park are underwater.Water was roaring over Little Manitou Falls at Pattison State Park.Photo credit: Gervase ThompsonAll rivers in the region are running extremely high. The falls at both Amnicon and Pattison are roaring, but road closures mean observing the falls now is challenging. The Bois Brule and Flambeau rivers are high enough that some canoe launches and campsites are underwater. The water is making its way downstream and the Lower Wisconsin River is running very high with all sandbars submerged and canoeing and kayaking not recommended. The river is expected to crest Muscoda this weekend at 40,000 cubic feet per second. .
    • I'm still going to smoke this fatty while camping this weekend whether Leech likes it or not.....😋       See you fellers on Monday........
    • Rick didn't like all the "My Grills bigger and better then yours" posts!  😅
    • We switched to a new server. Had a glitch in our dB that lost a couple days of posts.
    • I ripped a hole in one of my favorite pairs of fishing shorts just need a decent sized patch to cover her up
    • I am not sure what happened either but we lost all of the posts last couple days not just this thread. And it looks like the same thing happened over on FM site as well. I know the site was down last night while I tried look at it.
    • We had no problems but only brought 10 extra gallons over.  We fished 5 days, pretty much running wherever we wanted and ended with 7 gallons remaining in the boat.  So, we burned 30 gallons of fuel in a 1785 Lund with 90 hp Mercury 4 stroke.   I thought that was pretty good!
    • Seems to me that we are missing an entire page from this thread that was here yesterday.... what gives?  
    • What the frequency Kenneth?
    • this piece looks good, i interessting recipe for marinade. I make a meat with basil but want to taste new recipes. And one more think - i may advice you while smoking make a incisions if meat very broad