What do YOU think of AJ Pierzynski?

[iland99]

Quote:

---

I think your clear photo illustrates my point better than yours. If AJ wanted to get Justin he would have planeted his left foot on his ankle. You can see him clearly trying to avoid his foot with his right foot flexed to the right and nothing is touching poor Justin's little tootsies except the outside sole of the side of his foot. Remember he was trying to break up a double play on that play. And his head is down to make sure he did not step on poor Justin.

And as long as you still have your undies in a bunch, the shoes AJ are wearing look like rubber spikes to me which would make sense in the Baggie Dome. Maybe Justin has an alergy to rubber and AJ could have caused a severe allergic rash. I think this demands a full league investigation....Come on guys....Who's with me?????

Windy

---

Windy, I think you've gone from stirring the pot to smoking it. Seriously. That has got to be the most irrational line of thought I've ever heard. Wow. Just wow.

[Coach Dog]

Also, notice in the picture that AJ's head is looking down to where he is stepping!!! Only reason to look down at your feet while running is if you are trying to stomp on something. What a complete jacka$$! He needs a fastball right in the back this afternoon.

[Windy City Walleye Hunter]

Coach Dog,

The only thing you are missing in your line of thinking is the word "not". The only reason to look down at your feet while running is if you are "not" trying to stomp on something. If AJ were trying to "stomp" on something as you say, why would he not use his more powerful lead foot which would be his left foot where he could exert maximum pressure rather than daintely trying to pussyfoot around with his off foot, the right one????

Riddle me that Mister Wizzard!

Windy

[Coach Dog]

Windy, Sorry, my mistake, I am an (Contact Us Please). I should have known that AJ, the class act that he is, would never do such a thing like that. Again, I apologize for being so stupid.

[PierBridge]

[nofishfisherman]

After reading all of Windys posts he just lost any credibility that he ever had. Biggest Homer I have ever seen.

Maybe if you start passing around what ever it is your smoking we will all start to get your logic but for now I just have to laugh. Your a funny guy, not very bright but very very funny.

[LOTWSvirgin]

Quote:

---

---

AWESOME

[nofishfisherman]

Lets see how Windy can put a positive spin on a four pitch walk to Hunter with bases loaded in the bottom of the ninth with 2 outs. This should be a good one.

[snowman678]

I still really don't care about the play, nothing happened, I'm over it. Go back and read my posts, none of them even mentioned the play in question. My only point was how big of a hypocritical dumb@$$ that you make yourself look. I'm waiting for your answer on how "dirty" of a play it is to run over a catcher that is blocking the plate, yet you had no problem with AJ doing to Barrett last year. I'd just like for once to see you talk out the same side of your mouth. I know your just trying to stir the pot, but sometimes the pot doesn't need stirrin'.

[The Donk]

Obviously we all think AJ should be hit by a pitch, or whatever, but a little good natured fun can turn nasty if you try to make someone eat crow... There is a fine line here fellas, and its ONLY MAY yet!!

[Windy City Walleye Hunter]

Very Wise Words Donk,

And Snowman, you should know that a pot always needs stirrin' otherwise everything sticks to the bottom of it and I hate when things stick to my bottom! You guys crack me up, you make me raff as Mister Meyagi said.

Windy

[Windy City Walleye Hunter]

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Perhaps this is the best form of retaliation:

Morneau - 3 FOR 4, HR, 2 2B, 4RBI

A-Jerk - 1 FOR 4, 3 LOB

WhSux 2-7-0

Twinks 9-16-1

---

Should have been 4-4!!!!!

We own the Sox...

---

So, quick question to all you Twinkie lovers who should have been enjoying the beat down the Twinks gave to my beloved Pale Hose the past 3 days, but instead choose to open up Minnesota's biggest "whine-ery" gnashing and wailing over poor Justin's footsie.

How many of you agree with Pier's theory that The Twins "own" the Sox???? I'm guessing it will be all of you. So I went to the ole book of records looking to be bowled over by the Twins career winning percentage against my misearable Pale Hose...Could they have a .700 record against the Sox....Doubtful but surely they would have a .600 record against the Sox....They are at least over .500 against the Sox...RIGHT???

WRONG YOU ARE MY FRIENDS!!! They have a pitiful .474 record against the Sox. The Sox have issued the "beat down" on your Twinks nearly 100 times more than you so put that in your Creme-filled pipes and suck it! (nice Twinkie tie-in, don't you think)

Windy

[knoppers]

I have to say thank you AJ. you gave the twins a fire they have not got going. this is why the twins will kick the shat out out the sux this year. if the manager of the sox was smart, he and the GM would trade the team cancer.

[Caesarfishinguytoo]

Quote:

---

How many of you agree with Pier's theory that The Twins "own" the Sox???? I'm guessing it will be all of you. So I went to the ole book of records looking to be bowled over by the Twins career winning percentage against my misearable Pale Hose...Could they have a .700 record against the Sox....Doubtful but surely they would have a .600 record against the Sox....They are at least over .500 against the Sox...RIGHT???

WRONG YOU ARE MY FRIENDS!!! They have a pitiful .474 record against the Sox. The Sox have issued the "beat down" on your Twinks nearly 100 times more than you so put that in your Creme-filled pipes and suck it! (nice Twinkie tie-in, don't you think)

Windy

---

I totally agree with the statement!! He didn't detail his definition of ownership your stat says TWINS are .474 against the sox. Well my stat has it like this TWINS are 1.000 against the sox with 26 runs 39 hits, 8.7 runs and 13 hits a game in the 3 game series - can you say OWNERSHIP!!!!!

[Bobby Bass]

As Windy so often says.. What have you done lately... three game sweep....Twins are heading up in standing and someone else is fading... soon just to be a passing thought in 07...

[Windy City Walleye Hunter]

Slick,

I guess that is one of those "short-term" leases, eh? Maybe a try it before you buy it. I'll stick with the history book...all of the history book....and we are up a Benjamin on you guys!

Windy

[PierBridge]

[Caesarfishinguytoo]

Windy,

Okay, I didn't want to go there with history and all, but I do see you are sporting that nice World Series Ring for the Sox championship. But in the last 20 years I believe we are up by one in the ring department and I don't even want to talk about how many division titles we have won over you guys in that same time frame.

I know I know you guys got 3 rings if you want to count the 2 before any of us (sorry great grandpa George) were even born. I sure hope you don't want to go that far back, but who knows????

[bottomfeeder]

As a packer fan, you go back as far as you can.

Dan...converted to Twins in '87.

[snowman678]

Windy will go as far back as it takes to be to his advantage, you guys should know that by now.

[Windy City Walleye Hunter]

History is in the past but it is all in the past so everything counts. Even the tarnished ole piece of jewelry from 1906 or 1917 or when ever they won, ask Grandpa George he would know. If we are going to cut off history at 20 years then why not cut it off at 2 years, then we win 1-0 LOL

Windy

[Scott K]

If we are going to cut out history, look at last year, or even this year! Then we are back to " we win"

[kaz2611]

Would you purposely try to injure someone knowing you could suffer an injury yourself? I'm not referring to a person who is trying to defend himself cause then the answer would be yes. When you allow yourself to be drawn to the past you will lose focus on the future.

[genegodawa]

Windy you gotta stop living in the past. Each year starts a new season and with the free-agency of these days, the past has no bearing on the present, and that makes it irrelevant I don't care how many rings you have over the last 100 yrs.

Otherwise, the Yanks wouldn't be so far behind the BoSox.