Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

amsoil sabre


jdog

Recommended Posts

i was just curious is this a good oil for breaking in a new auger if so just wondering what ratio everyone else used for the break in process ive seen most people use 80:1 or 100:1 and im kinda scared to go that low with the oil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was skeptical at first too, but I've been using it for 3 years at 100:1 and my auger has never ran as good! Way less smoke in the shack too. As said above though, id follow your manufacturers recommendation for the first couple tanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brand new machine you can use the AMSOIL Saber Professional, but the first tank or two mix it richer 50-1 with Saber Prof for break-in. Then after a couple of tanks you can safely drop to the leaner 80-1 or 100-1.

Follow this TO THE LETTER, and you will have no problems! I run at 80-1 or so, and won't ever let anything else get into my gas tank!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the original poster's question:

Sorry, but I have to call the B. S. card here.

I know Amsoil is a forum sponsor and they make an excellent product for most uses (I use it myself), but NEVER use a fully synthetic oil for break in. If you do some research past “forum knowledge”, you will find that the excellent lubricity of Amsoil and other synthetic oils will actually inhibit the metal to metal seating that you want to have when breaking in an engine, most specifically the rings. If you use a mineral based oil for break in, the rings will wear into the cylinder walls (seat) and maximize your compression. With a synthetic, the engine seems to break in just fine, but ring seating is minimized, resulting in a less powerful engine that will never work as well as if you did it right the first time.

An example of this is the three snowmobile manufacturers who still produce two stroke engines. All three actually deliver the sleds to the user with tank full a semi synthetic oil blend (colored the same as their recommended fully synthetic oil) to ensure that the engines break in correctly. While the synthetics will not cause failure on break in, you will never have an engine as powerful as one broken in on a mineral or synthetic/mineral blend (semi synthetic).

Always follow the manufacturer’s recommendations for the first couple of tanks then feel free to go to the synthetics at the 80:1 or 100:0 mixtures for the rest of the life of the engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the original poster's question:

Sorry, but I have to call the B. S. card here.

I know Amsoil is a forum sponsor and they make an excellent product for most uses (I use it myself), but NEVER use a fully synthetic oil for break in. If you do some research past “forum knowledge”, you will find that the excellent lubricity of Amsoil and other synthetic oils will actually inhibit the metal to metal seating that you want to have when breaking in an engine, most specifically the rings. If you use a mineral based oil for break in, the rings will wear into the cylinder walls (seat) and maximize your compression. With a synthetic, the engine seems to break in just fine, but ring seating is minimized, resulting in a less powerful engine that will never work as well as if you did it right the first time.

An example of this is the three snowmobile manufacturers who still produce two stroke engines. All three actually deliver the sleds to the user with tank full a semi synthetic oil blend (colored the same as their recommended fully synthetic oil) to ensure that the engines break in correctly. While the synthetics will not cause failure on break in, you will never have an engine as powerful as one broken in on a mineral or synthetic/mineral blend (semi synthetic).

Always follow the manufacturer’s recommendations for the first couple of tanks then feel free to go to the synthetics at the 80:1 or 100:0 mixtures for the rest of the life of the engine.

Boy Hydro - way to lay into him. I thought it was a valid question... especially considering how much people talk up Amsoil on these forums. Not everyone knows as much as you man..... that's why they ask questions here....jeez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Hydro in your response to your crusty answer I say your full of B.S. I now breakin with Amsoil on my new gear and no power issues at all . Stihl does the same with their chainsaws etc and I just bought one that came with the stihl synthetic but I used Amsoil instead . All you have to do for breakin and seating is get the engine hot . I haven't believed the ol wives tale of using dino oil for breakins in years . Car manufacturers don't use dino oil either . The tech has come a long ways .

TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amsoil fixed my chainsaw!!!!! I picked up a used saw and would not start hot or idle. I adjusted the idle until there was no idle left. I was going to take it apart but instead I tried 80 to 1 went into the back yard worked work about a half tank through it and it got alot better. Took it to the cabin dropped a few trees and it runs like a champ!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I am not bashing either Don or Amsoil. It's a great product and Don is the guy to buy it from. Absolutely use it on a day to day basis in all of your power equipment.

I do, however, stand behind my statement that break in is not the time to use synthetics, due to the reality that they lubricate extremely well. You can use it for beak in if you wish, and your engine will still run, but just not quite as well. One more tidbit, the long term corrosion resistance of synthetic oil is far less than traditional mineral oil, so be sure to fog any engine you have used it in before putting them away for the season.

TD, do you know for a fact that the automakers fill the crankcase at the factory with fully synthetic oil for the break in period? It would be interesting to know if they do, and what manufacturing tolerances enable them to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The technology of OEM honing and manufacturing improved a very big step around year 2000. The auto manufacturing began using "micro-honing" around then. They also started using the 'new' technology of low-tension rings. Break-in is essential immediate. GM started using synthetics as factory fill in most Corvettes in 1989. GM with 2011 model year is using only synthetic in all gasoline engines - the new dexos1 spec, though the word 'synthetic' is not in the specification, there is no oil company trying to meet the spec without being a full synthetic. The factory fill is a full synthetic product from Exxon/Mobil. Most European cars have been using synthetics for factory fill since about 2000. The Ford Motorcraft factory fill and preferred engine oil since about 2000 in most of their gasoline engines is partial-synthetic minimum spec.

However, I do not know whether 2-cycle engines are using the 'micro-honing' or not. But many, many have successfully used synthetic mix oil from new in these engines for at least the last 10 years. Most 2-cycle engine manufacturers do prefer to use the oil double rich for break-in of the first couple of tanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
    • We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor,  wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will want for this boat?  Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke  Mariner motor)  I will appreciate any help with these questions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.