BlueLundFishrman Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 The AP (associated press, not adrian peterson!) votes are in.Peyton Manning QB Indianapolis 39 1/2 Drew Brees QB New Orleans 7 1/2 Philip Rivers QB San Diego 2 Brett Favre QB Minnesota 1 Peyton wins it in a romp. I was kind of surprised. With the season Brett Farve had with the Vikings, thought he might garner more than 1 vote. So does this mean that Peyton is that much more valuable than Brett, and/or does it also mean that Brett isn't that much more valuable than Tarvaris? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riverrat56 Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Well Peyton was a lock to win it IMO but I also thought Favre would have more than 1 vote. If the Vikes had finished 14-2 we may have seen a differnt picture in the voting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdafisher Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 If Tarvaris would have played where would he have been in the voting? Ha. Fourth place behind those 3 guys is not so bad, but I would agree that 1 vote seems low. That being said, it is pretty hard to argue with Payton.SKOL VIKES!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Brett can pose with his Lombardi trophy this year instead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLundFishrman Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 Will the Packers let him come back to Lambeau to do that photo shoot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 I'm sure they will have no problem because the only way they see the trophy is if he brings it with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishersofmen Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Lol.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juneau4 Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Favre would prefer the superbowl MVP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLundFishrman Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 FArve's lombardi trophy is already in Green Bay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Dave2 Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 That was his PREVIOUS Lombardi trophy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLundFishrman Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 his one and only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juneau4 Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Favre has never been the MVP in a Super Bowl. This will be his first. That leaves the Packers out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Without Manning, the Colts are a terribly average to below average team. HE IS the Colts. Rivers, Brees and Favre all have stronger complimentary players than does Peyton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBMasterAngler Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 The vikes' weak finish definitely cost him...would he have won it if we finished 14-2? Probably not, but probably would've finished 2nd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zamboni Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Without Manning, the Colts are a terribly average to below average team. HE IS the Colts. Rivers, Brees and Favre all have stronger complimentary players than does Peyton. He has Clark and Wayne, but problem is, take Peyton away from them, and are they the same? NOPE, all comes back to how good #18 is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Farve is simply not on a great team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Not a great team?The only thing this team could have done better is secure a #1 seed instead of #2.This is one of the better teams in the Vikings history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 We will see how far they go into the play-offs.Most great teams have rings. If the Queens win, I will bow down to all of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Harvey did you really win Hater Of The Year award? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahoohendoo Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 most definetly! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 We should be pretty good....the pieces are in place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Harvey did you really win Hater Of The Year award? Of course not, I am just speaking facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 We will see how far they go into the play-offs.Most great teams have rings. If the Queens win, I will bow down to all of them. How about giving the team the chance to get the ring before you call them down as not being great. Sorry but you arent speaking in facts in reguards to this team. You are speaking of facts reguarding past viking teams, most notably teams of over 30 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Lets just wait ans see the results at the end of the season james walleye.I can give them the chance to get a ring, its just not going to be this year.I won't let the purple clouds fog my vision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Oh i know, thinking the 12-4 vikings could win this weekend at home (where they are 8-0 this year) is brought on by looking through purple clouds hahaha. Sorry but you looking at this years vikings through the past is no better, or more realistic for that matter than the next guy drinking purple kool-aid. Being realistic is a "middle-ground" and you are not there. Not saying i am there either, but you are not sir.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.