Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

UND one step closer to losing nickname & logo


so haaad

Recommended Posts

UND took one step closer to losing their Fighting Sioux nickname and logo. The North Dakota's Board of Higher Education agreed to drop UND's Fighting Sioux nickname and Indian head logo, effective Aug. 1, 2010. Sounds like the nickname could survive if all the Sioux tribes agree that UND can continue to use the nickname and logo. The last of the Sioux tribes, the Standing Rock tribe, must agree by Oct. 1.

Before UND sports teams were nicknamed the Fighting Sioux they were the Flickertails. Gooooo Flickertails!!! The UND/UM hockey rivalry would become the battle of the best ground rodent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This really drives my crazy!! If they are forced to change there is going to be a lot less money donated to the college. And the season ticket holders are not happy and I know people that will not go to any events after this happens!!! Its sad!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really too bad Englstad isn't still alive because this wouldn't be an issue. Here's one gopher fan pulling for the sioux to keep their name and a huge part of their tradition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This really drives my crazy!! If they are forced to change there is going to be a lot less money donated to the college. And the season ticket holders are not happy and I know people that will not go to any events after this happens!!! Its sad!!

What more do they need to donate to UND? Ralph has passed away but his wife Betty did donate for a new Basketball court for men/womens program at UND. I hate to see the nickname go but hopefully they get to keep it. What about the Seminoles' of Florida State they still have the nickname don't they? Anyways we'll see what happens...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't everyone getting a little over sensitive? If they changed their name to the fighting Caucasians it wouldn’t bother me in the least because Caucasian is not a derogatory comment any more than Sioux is. Sioux is a tribe of native American people, and naming a college team after them is in no way degrading to the tribe.

I used to drive a Pontiac, isn’t that a native American name? Do we have to change the name of Sioux Falls, SD next…where does it stop?

By the way Nate Larsen, I love your solution. I think the lawyer aspect really sums it all up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Florida State cut a deal ($$$$$) with the local tribe so they get to keep their name. I would think if the university were to give the tribes a cut of the apparel sales everyone would win but I'm sure its more complicated than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not bashing the sioux tribe but it kinda makes you wonder at times, im sure the guys like you said at FSU got some real nice change to say it was ok to keep the name, are other tribes out there doing the same trying to get money? Im not saying they did or anything but the way money runs all in the country makes you think doesnt it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now correct if i'm wrong Mr. QuackAddict but isn't it in the lease agreement that if UND changes thier name, the Englestad family, who owns the arena, will boot them out

I have no idea, I just remember Ralph saying that if UND changes the name, he would not donate the $110(?) million for the new rink when they had talks about having to change the name by NCAA rules or whatsoever but not sure on the agreement though, did you hear anything about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a little refresher on the Sioux issue. The name is an abbreviation of the French corruption Nadaouesioux of the Algonquian name Nadowesiwug, " little snakes."

I don't know too many groups of people who'd like to be known as little snakes, and it was a name given to them by someone else. They call themselves Dakota, Nakota or Lakota, depending on which branch they're from. Dakota also is used to describe the tribe as a whole. What we know as the western Sioux bands are Lakota bands. The word means "allies."

So there are plenty of Dakota people who don't like the name Sioux in the first place, though there also are plenty of them who are just fine with it.

Many also don't like Fighting Sioux because they feel it perpetuates the stereotype of the murderous days of the Indian Wars during the Old West. In fact, even before white settlement there was plenty of fighting between tribes, as stealing horses and such were ways for young Indian men to gain wealth, and touching a live enemy was proof of bravery and built prestige. But the Lakota also emphasized loyalty to the band, selflessness within the band, and many other things that we see as culturally positive.

However, there are a lot of Sioux/Dakota who like Fighting Sioux, as evidenced by the Spirit Lake (Dakota) tribal voters, who approved a referendum supporting UND's use of the nickname. One problem is that the tribal councils tend to be more traditional and conservative than the voters, and even if Standing Rock (Lakota) Reservation voters are in favor of the name (a referendum approving it likely would pass if it got put to a vote), it's quite possible neither tribal council would issue a letter of approval for the name, and those documents would be needed for UND to keep the name. There are tribal elections coming up, and people on both reservations are talking about booting the incumbents and voting in people who will represent the will of the people, but it's unlikely that could happen in time for the Oct. 1 deadline.

There's no part of the arena contract that dumps UND athletic teams if the name is changed, so they'll stay there.

Sorry to get long-winded. Typically, I probably put in too much information. shockedshocked

But I've been really interested in this issue for a long time. I was an Indian Studies/English major at UND and was immersed in the Lakota world for a time, and then I reported news stories on the issue for the Grand Forks Herald when it heated up about 10 years ago.

I understand both sides of this issue, and can sympathize each way. As a UND alum, I personally don't care whether the name stays or goes. An athletic tradition is not contained by a name. It is the accumulation of all the victories, losses and character building that have gone before this day and the expectation of all those things yet to come.

I was a Grand Forks Central High School Redskin when I graduated, and they changed that name to the Knights several years later. That gave me a little twinge, but I was much younger at the time.

If the name does get changed, sure, there'll be some outrage. It's human nature. People need something to get their knickers in a twist over. Then it'll blow over and things will go on as they always have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes good post Steve!

Maybe the name is considered derogatory to the Indians but the I think the college has one of the best followings in the nation.

I'm a SCSU alumni and hockey season ticket holder. IMO, no one has a better following/fan support in the WCHA than No Dak. To me that shows pride and respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't stand UND, but I can sympathize with them on this topic. Any team that has an indian nickname is most likely showing a sign of respect to that particular tribe. I will never understand why people think is is derogatory...? I can also understand why the "fighting" part may offend some people, but come on, this is an athletic team's name. Are they going to come out and be called the "Lay down and die" Sioux? Like I said, I don't care for UND in any way and I couldn't care less if the name gets changed, but it will definitley be hard to get used to should the name ultimately end up getting changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
    • We have bought a new boat, which we will be picking up this spring. It is an Alumacraft Competitor 165 sport with a 90 horse Yamaha motor. I will be buying and installing a trolling motor,  wondering if I can get some recommendations on what pound thrust I will want for this boat?  Also, I will be selling my old boat, is there a good way to determine the value on an older boat ( mid-80's with a 75 horse 2-stroke  Mariner motor)  I will appreciate any help with these questions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.