Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Joe15

Earn A Buck

63 posts in this topic

I believe that in minnesota they should imply the earn a buck program to where you have to shoot a doe before you shoot a buck that would decrease the doe to buck ratio...well guess thats just what i believe...i mean look at wisconsin...they have it they have tons of nice bucks commin out of there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

u serious...down here in southwest we probably see three to four does somes times more to every one buck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we hunt by hackensack and every year there is less and less deer.....idk if its cuz u can get a bonus permit or what but i seemed like every truck had a couple fawns in it this yr we didnt even hunt up there and other guys from our hunting party did and seen 3 deer both wknds....no one went up this wknd bcuz of it....so if this were to happen they should make it u have to shoot an actual doe not a fawn or button buck a mature doe...idk why they have the bonus tag up there theres simply no deer....i like the earn a buck idea though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does EAB apply in WI to archery hunting too?

Just curious.

I am on the fence for EAB. Good idea in some areas, no good for other areas.

Obviously EAB in a lottery zone wont ever happen. So that cuts out a large part of the state right off the bat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say we have the rifle season at the same time Wisconsin does.Last week of Nov. After the rut.Eliminate party hunting, stiffen the non-baiting laws for violaters, and take away their hunting rights when they get caught.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

legalize baiting. keep party hunting. later rifle season. no earn a buck. 8 pt antler restriction.

my .02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having the rifle season the same as WI, could impact numbers of hunters in the woods.

And my guess would be that people are going to choose WI over MN in a lot of cases.

So in essence you lower deer hunter numbers in MN, and I dont think the DNR is going to flirt with that issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Browning......we hunt by Hackensack as well and this year was way down from past years. I only got 4 deer for our party, although I could have shot more but didn't. 3 out of the 4 were does (2 fawns) and my son hit a nice buck that we couldn't find. This was the first year since the lat 90's that we haven't gotten our limit. I don't know if the deer are running on a cycle like grouse or what. My brother has a "golden" stand that has taken 5 bucks in the previous 5 years and was considered automatic. Haven't seen a deer off the stand this year. Opening afternoon I had deer in front of my stand for almost an hour, but no horns. We seem to find the doesn and fawns, but he bucks are coming harder and harder to come by.

I would favor an Earn A Buck, but like stated above, you should have to harvest a doe that is at least 2 years old or older. Let the young button bucks and fawns grow up and thin the heard of mature does. Our area (245) has been a management/intensive harvest area for quite a few years now, so I would think that Earn A Buck would help control the population to the point where you wouldn't need the management/intensive harvest areas. Just my thoughts......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having the rifle season the same as WI, could impact numbers of hunters in the woods.

And my guess would be that people are going to choose WI over MN in a lot of cases.

This would be better yet, less people in the woods, and more deer to be seen.Another thing too, they could do away with that early antlerless season.I understand that the DNR would probably be against having MN and Wisc. seasons at the same time, but they don't seem to know what they're doing anyhow?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line, the DNR isnt going to do anything that will cause hunter loss in MN.

I agree. Let em go to Sconny and keep more deer for us. But its never going to happen. The DNR is trying to remove deer. Not save them. Losing hunters will reduce harvest.

I wouldnt go so far as to say they dont know what they are doing.

They will never please 100% of the population. No matter what they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well said biglake, something really big has to happen for them to do anything, one bad year that i guess the numbers dont look as bad as we think wont do anything to the dnr. I would love to see something different, have to draw for buck tags or something Earn a buck something to help the buck popultion would be great, but really you arent going to change people who shoot whatever they see mature or fawn. The hunter is the first thing that needs to change in my opinion, get them to stop shooting fawns spikes and 4 pointers and we will see the big bucks down the line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Earn a buck would blow. Have you guys not seen the threads on here where people are just not seeing the deer? I am in an Intensive harvest area and I would not say that it is lousy with does. If I hunt enough, I'll get a chance to take one, but in no way are they so populated where I can just go out and take my pick of a doe. In Sconny, they are pretty thick. It is not that hard to get one. Right now, in an intensive area, I'm hunting my but off just to get a mature doe. If we want to do something about the number of mature bucks, allow absolutely no party hunting if you shoot a mature buck, you are absolutely done shooting bucks. There should be NO cross tagging for bucks. I don't want to rip on anybody who does that now, because it is legal, I just don't think they are helping the population by allowing party hunting. As for does, there are enough management opportunities that not many should need to cross tag does. I really think that would help. I'm sure that there would still be some cheaters, but it might some might actually follow the rules. Also, move the season back one week. In the southeast, make it a 5 day 3A season, bucks only, then open it back up for the 3B after it has been closed for 2 days.

Wisconsin is overpopulated with deer, that is why the EAB program is instituted, Who on here thinks we have an overpopulation of deer? I am in intensive harvest area 342, we have a nice amount of deer, but it is not an over populated. I would take a complete redesign of the system down here and I don't think it is going to fly anytime soon unless the deer herd gets out of control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen only 1 doe in the past 3 years and have the luxury to hunt 3 different areas. It would turn into the honest people doing it the right way and the dishonest people shooting that buck first doe second anyway or if no doe dragging that buck to the house in the dark and not tagging it, just butchering it. Or, wouldn't we all flock to bow hunt so we can get our doe out of the way before rifle season ? I think our fawns, especially button bucks because they are bigger usually than a doe fawn, would really pay the price. I think our state is different from top to bottom and some areas wouldn't handle earn a buck very well. We already have intensive harvest areas and the like and people,wolves,cars are already thinning down the herd enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can hunt an area that has the October doe season, if you tagged an antlerless would that count then toward earn a buck ? If it did those areas would probably be under intense hunting pressure and there would be no selective harvest going on, blast a baldy so you can open the regular rifle season a buck hunter or heck I would bet some this is a reach but heck tag a road kill, claim it as a bow shot deer to avoid earning a buck ? Just some wild thoughts guys but we all know how some work hard to get around the law. I think our state is diverse and there are pockets of overpopulation, but in my intensive area things seem under control, too much so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if we were to do something like this, Something like what ND does sounds good to me. ROST said something in a thread about lottery picks in each county or something that we could do here in MN. People wanting to shoot bucks need to put their name in a lottery and if you dont get one, you can only shoot a doe and if have a buck of the lifetime walk by you pass it up or maybe do "dont get caught" like some people think.

Otherwise earn a buck will work out for me because there are plenty of does in my area but for some there is not. So I don't see this working out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not a biologist but I dont think an earn a buck would work that well everywhere in mn. I think that an EAB season is meant for areas with high populations of deer. Yes WI has earn a buck and have lots of deer but they would have a high population of deer without it also. It appears that most people just arent seeing deer in general not just bucks.

I think the DNR needs to limit everyone in MN with lower populations of deer to 1 buck and a doe lottery. you need does to make more deer.

In areas with lots of deer the DNR should think abotu doing a earn a buck.

I think once the populations get established the DNR should have a point restriction for the entire state. just my opinion im prolly wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, giving it more thought I'd either bow hunt a doe/fawn or hunt the October antlerless season so my buck tag is wide open come rifle season if those were ok to satisfying earn a buck. I have land where I see way more bucks than does. Last 15 deer I've seen were 9 antlered bucks, 2 does, and 4 fawns and this covers the past 3 years. On trail cam 2 week period before rifle season had 12 different bucks, 2 does and 1 fawn on it. Come rifle season I saw 1 buck, a 14 pointer and no other deer the rest of the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Careful what you wish for - the unit I hunt in WI has been EAB for the past 3 years and the numbers are WAY down. I don't have a problem with EAB in general - it has proven to be an effective management tool, however, the DNR IMO has gone overboard with it in certain areas. The past two years our group of 3 has seen fewer deer combined than each of us used to see individually. I saw two deer Sat and one Sun in beautiful, prime whitetail country. We are gonna send a letter/petition to the DNR and will have no problem getting signatures.

I mentioned it before on a post, but many areas such as where I hunt have gone from needing to apply for, and maybe getting, a choice permit so you could shoot a single doe to mandatory doe harvest for a buck sticker. Pretty radical change in management.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would really be nice if we (in MN) could just maintain a satisfactory population. It seems like there are swings from lottery to intensive, and back. I think the whole state should either be lottery or managed. Three deer a year is plenty for most people, but I still think some shoot 5 because they can. I know that some people maybe go through five a year, but I don't think that they would have problems getting a few more from friends or relatives if it was needed or if they wanted some more. After reading the reports on here and from hunters in my area, I don't think the population is anywhere near where it should be considered EAB. I think that there are some areas that have heavy concentrations of deer, and others that are relatively void, but in the overall scheme of things, it is still a relatively moderate average for the population. Not too high, and not too low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So much pressure is put on the 5 deer limit.

Less than 5% of hunters take 3 deer or more as it stands today.

That said, most intensive harvest areas are not suffering because of people hoarding deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right on Cooter, we need to ask people from other states that hunt deer to have their input on baiting, EAB, etc.Let's not try to reinvent the wheel. For the most part I think most hunters are ok with the way we have it now, no bait, our rut hunting is the bait, no EAB, your party can decide if they wish to hunt that way, why do things because of waiting until it's in our 2009 handbook, make the best decisions for your area for what you are allowed to take, my dad and I since 1994 have been only taking larger bucks with no exceptions, sure makes you wonder when you get a bruiser is that a buck you let go a year or two before ? Anyway, we hit a horrible winter soon and there will be changes. The grass isn't always greener and change doesn't mean it will be for the better and what is enough or good enough for each hunter in MN. It's 2008, things are way different today than it was 1983 when I started. My first year it was 3 days first weekend bucks only and the 2nd weekend was 2 days buck or doe depending on if you received a doe permit by application. That was the last year for the metal tags with the big ball on the end. I'm convinced there were more deer in my areas then when we had to apply for the permit to now having intensive and a early rifle doe hunt, remember the huge deer yarding up in the winter ? then 1984 came 2 days and then 4 days, doe either weekend if drawn. Just some thoughts, good luck blackpowdering !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Less than 5% of hunters take 3 deer or more as it stands today.

Those are the deer that are registered, there are lot more that party hunt, shoot 5 deer, and have them registered under someone elses name. Still, if only 5% register 5 deer, why do we need it??? Not saying that its right or wrong, but it happens more than we think. I suppose in the grand scheme of things, its pretty minor as long as everyone registers their deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
there are lot more that party hunt, shoot 5 deer, and have them registered under someone elses name.

Exactly. Get rid of the party hunting! You shoot it, you tag it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
    • I use a thin super-line/braid. That said,  a friend of mine swears by mono in really clear water and I've sat with him and seen a lot of wary fish that still get close enough to ruin their day. Not sure if it matters or not... I just like the assurance of braid.
  • Our Sponsors