Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Tippman

Record Dogfish?

103 posts in this topic

Here's a fishing story for you, believe what you want as I'm not even sure myself yet but definately interesting. Here's how it goes:

A middle aged female co-worker causually mentions to me that she caught a "really big dogfish this weekend that weighted 17 lbs". I immediately asked where and what she used to obtain the weight and she replied "Oh just one of those old spring scales, but it's pretty accurate". I smiled and asked what she did with it, her response was "I burried it". So I go on to tell her she may have burried the state record dogfish as in her garden for fertilizer if it was anywhere close to that weight!

Her interest was now sparked and she agreed it may be a good idea to try and "recover" the bowfin. (This is Monday night and the fish was caught Saturday)

The next day at work she tells me she dug the fish up as her husband was telling her she had gone crazy. Since the record is recorded at 31 inches I had told her the best way to get a close idea was to grab a quick length measurement. Well she was happy to report her fish was nearly 37 inches! Dnr personnel were called and someone came out shortly after. He first got her license, then said this was going to be quite the story if it tested out officially as a bowfin. (Record fish apparently need genetic testing to assure their species)

So now she's waiting to hear the official results from the Dnr. I told her I expect my name mentioned in her interview if it happens. I don't believe there are any pictures and it occured in west central Mn.

Interesting story, I hope everything works out. You heard it here on FM first if it does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting did not think the DNR would accept a fish that was burried for a day. Must of sounded or should I say smelled FISHY!!!

Keep us posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a funny and ironic story and on par for the highly respected dogfish laugh

Let us know what happens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

haha you wonder how many people catch some of those less then sought after record and just toss the fish back without ever thinking twice. Let us know what happens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the question now would be. how much would it weigh after being dried in dirt for 2 days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two summers ago on Pokegama I caught an 18"~ Rock Bass, and just tossed it back without a thought. We figured it to be in the 3# range. I thought about it later when my wifes grandpa said it the biggest one he had ever seen. We checked the record weight and decided that if we ever saw one that big again it would not go straight back without a fair amount of investigating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She could get a record, and a ticket for wanton waste all in one smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She could get a record, and a ticket for wanton waste all in one smile

How in the heck would you classify that as wanton waste?? She took the fish home, and put it in the garden for fertilizer. She didn't leave it in the water to die, or on shore to rot away. What she did with it after she got home with it was totaly legal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha! Cool story smile

Where is Bowfin when we need him wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just made a nice spreadsheet with all the State records on it, with Weight, Lengths & girths so this never happens to me. I dont want to be the guy that let any record fish go without at least checking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just made a nice spreadsheet with all the State records on it, with Weight, Lengths & girths so this never happens to me. I dont want to be the guy that let any record fish go without at least checking

That is a good idea. Put it in your tackle box, and check it when the fish is questionable. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there will be no ticket for wanton waste, that is one of the legal ways of discarding fish if I remember correctly.

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BBB if you want a copy post your email and ill send it to you. Just a regular spreadsheet on one page so it can be folded and stuck in your box...Just in case

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BBB if you want a copy post your email and ill send it to you. Just a regular spreadsheet on one page so it can be folded and stuck in your box...Just in case

Can you send me one please... KPfly12 @ hotmail . com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take one too please if it would not be a bother mattiqm@yahoo.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Farmboy1
She could get a record, and a ticket for wanton waste all in one smile

How in the heck would you classify that as wanton waste?? She took the fish home, and put it in the garden for fertilizer. She didn't leave it in the water to die, or on shore to rot away. What she did with it after she got home with it was totaly legal.

Doubtful that she could get a wanton waste ticket because you can burry any fish species you want because using it for fertilizer would be just as pro-active as eating it. Furthermore it is illegal to release a bowfin after catching it because they are so detramental to lakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BBB if you want a copy post your email and ill send it to you. Just a regular spreadsheet on one page so it can be folded and stuck in your box...Just in case

Sure, I'll take one. It's huntershaven @ embarqmail.com

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Furthermore it is illegal to release a bowfin after catching it because they are so detramental to lakes.

Hmm... You sure 'bout that one?

They changed the release laws for rough fish a long time ago because of the filth of all the ones discarded on shore.

That's when the wanton waste laws started becoming significant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Furthermore it is illegal to release a bowfin after catching it because they are so detramental to lakes"

NO! Bowfin are part of a healthy fish population! They are a very misunderstood species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors