Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
panthrcat

up close deer

30 posts in this topic

I was able to get in closer to some deer tonight,, I was pleased with what my lens did here,,

IMG_0287copy.jpg

IMG_0289copy.jpg

IMG_0296copy.jpg

IMG_0299copy.jpg

IMG_0309copy.jpg

IMG_0312copy.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be happy with my lens, too! I love the 3rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really nice work, Sue. I particularly like the interactive captures. These compliments are for you, not your lens. smilesmile

Which 400mm is it, by the way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, makes a person think twice about hunting them..nice picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are up close and personal for sure! The interactions shot is not something you often see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very nice how close did you get

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice! I love taking images of Deer. It's amazing how close you can get if you work for it.

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which 400mm is it, by the way?

thank you all! the lens Steve, is the 100-400 L f/4.5 IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great shots!

The 100-400L is a great lens. I miss mine. Might have to pick one up again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe thanks BK's dad smile

yea I like the lens, I am still trying to figure out how to use it though..

and to answer Rangers question about how close I got,, only about 20 feet away!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sue, I used the 100-400 hard for four years. I thought I recognized it, but wanted to make sure.

There are a few oddities to master, but once mastered it's the best combination of flexibility and IQ in the Canon supertele lineup! It's a shame you can't come down here for some hands-on, but if you make a new post asking for 100-400 hints, I bet you'd get a lot! gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sue, I used the 100-400 hard for four years. I thought I recognized it, but wanted to make sure.

There are a few oddities to master, but once mastered it's the best combination of flexibility and IQ in the Canon supertele lineup!

well that's promising,, but I think my "writers block" is from not seeing anything when I am out,, I'm very frustrated with the whole thing right now,, I go out, or I try to a few times a week, and sit or ride, or even walk, and am not seeing anything, or when I do, I make stupid mistakes and spook it. eek I am a hunterwoman, I know better,, I find I am getting mad at myself alot.. I think I got to slow down, and not try so hard,, maybe then things will happen for me.

thanks for the input on the lens,, I was so excited when I got it in February,, I've got an upcoming trip in June, and hope to get better at it for that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I got to slow down, and not try so hard.

If you are in a hurry or anxious, the animals sense it. People who want instant gratification should watch TV gameshows or Internet sites like Facebook. Nature photographers like us, on the other hand, put into practice the axiom that less is more. smilesmile

I've sat in one spot for 16 hours waiting for the light to get perfect, hoping that, once it was perfect, something would step/fly/swim into the frame. It happens once in ten tries, or less, but whether you make a capture or not, slowing your body's systems, letting the pulse drag, allowing the eye to catch subtle movements . . . well . . . why else go into the wilds? smilesmile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very true, I think I get all caught up in my "honey dew list" that I am not making time for me,, and then I feel rushed,, my schedule allows me 4 days off in a row, good grief, I should be able to take a day or two for myself,, no? laugh

tonight what I did was went to a few places, scoping it out for what you speak of,, an area that's a great landscape, and with any luck at all, something might surprise me!

thanks steve for understanding me, and giving me your input,, much appreciated!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sue - I love this series. I have the same lens and learning how to use it as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sue - I love this series. I have the same lens and learning how to use it as well.

yea I have heard so many great things about this lens,, which is why I really wanted it,, I am in the bush so much throughout the year,, I figured I might put it to some good use,, nothing really jumps out at me in the way of "images" just yet,, but soon I am sure I'll get it figured out,, good luck with your learning curve Debbie,, it's going to be an adventure I am sure!!

thanks for the comments Deb smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's definitely a learning curve on the 100-400, partly because the push-pull zoom takes some getting used to and partly because shooting a supertelephoto offers a few challenges of its own with steadying technique.

Lots of fun learning, though! smilesmile

When I shot that lens, I generally left iso at 400 so I could stop down one stop to f8 and still have enough shutter speed in most situations to capture sharp images. The 100-400 is a little soft wide open at 400mm. Bumping it back to 350mm wide open or stopping down to f8 sharpens it up. That slight softness varies slightly from copy to copy of the lens and is generally noticeable only to photographers, who really scope our our own work. A monopod with that lens (actually with any IS lens 200mm or over) is a deadly combo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       

    • Come on Del like any good law we have to pass it to find out what is in it.
    • If you guys (Dave et al) are so "end the war on drugs" you ought to be able to say what that means.  How can you advocate something that you can't, or won't, define?    
    • You dont care about his statements on the 2nd amendment or his ties with radical mooslims as you put it?  
    •   I don't reside in his district and have no power to vote for or against him so I don't spend much of my free time thinking about him.
    •   But your OK with paying for people to sit in prison?   The reason you want to keep drugs criminalized is because they are dangerous, is it not?
  • Our Sponsors