Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Knot vs. a Snap Swivel


Walleye #1

Recommended Posts

I was watching a fishing show this morning, because it was way to cold to venture outside....anyways they were fishing on URL for crappies and eyes and using jigging spoons, what I noticed is that they had a swivel on. Do alot of you prefer to do this so you can swap lures quicker, or do you feel tying directly to the lure is the better method? Just curious. I have always tied directly to the lure, I guess I have just thought it gives most jigging spoons better action.

Walleye #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely tie directly to the jig,hook,or spoon. All three are designed to be tied direct. You will alter the action the jig is designed to do. Also adding more hardware never is the answer for negitive mooded fish. Take the extra minute and tie direct i know tou will catch more fish for your effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you ever go into Gander or cabelas you may have seen some of the promo videos they have playing above the Lure displays. One comes to mind where the manufacture reccomends you use a Snap and a swivel combo.

They go on to say that the snap allows 100% of intended lure movement where tieing directly does not allow this. They also go on and mention putting a swivel on your line 18" up or so from the Snap.

I have noticed that scince doing this. I have noticed my lures seem to have a bit more action to them. i also have noticed that when the lure comes to rest it does not spin in the water from the line twisting up.

Depending on which length rod I am using for Jigging, ( airplane , Rapalas, or even the Chubby Darter ) depends on where i tie my swivel. For example if i am using my 24" rod I have the swivel tied at about 18" so i can still wind my line up all the way and hook onto the hook Eye on my rod near the Handle base for storage.

My 28" rod I tie close to 20"

I based my Comparison on watching my lures with my aqua view.

I will say i belive that i have gotten more hits on a lure when it was at rest and nott spinning in a circle compared to when it used to spin. But this is just my Observation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I'm using total finesse gear with ultralight line for very shy pannies (pretty rare), I always put on a black crosslock snap (not including swivel.) Ease of changing lures isn't the bigger deal for me. The snap allows a LOT more freedom of lure movement than any knot, and I do just as well with the snap fishing next to folks tying directly to the lure. Since most of my jigging lures twist the line, I also put a black ball-bearing swivel about 2 feet to 3 feet up the line, and then put a fluoro leader in the same test as my main line between the swivel and the snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: talltines
Definitely tie directly to the jig,hook,or spoon. All three are designed to be tied direct. You will alter the action the jig is designed to do. Also adding more hardware never is the answer for negitive mooded fish. Take the extra minute and tie direct i know tou will catch more fish for your effort.

Well, I'm going to respectfully disagree, it really depends. There are some ice baits (Salmo Chubby Darter comes immediately to mind) where the manufacturer says a small snap is the minimum required for the proper action of the lure. There are a few jigging spoons where a small barrel swivel tied 12 inches of so above the spoon/and or snap eliminates the line twist inherent in a lot of jigging spoons (which is one of the reasons I really like the new Lindy Rattl'n Flyer jigging spoons, glides down without line twist.)

I usually take three rods with me on every trip - two are the rigs I use with Genz Worms, Genz Bugs, Gitzit jigs, etc., and those of course I tie on directly. The rig I use with jigging spoons, Chubby Darters, Jigging Raps, I use a small snap to the lure and a small barrel swivel 12 or so inches above the lure. Works great, minimal line twist if any and I get the proper action(s) that I am looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No knot snap user here,too.I have used them with Jigging Rapalas, and Nils Master Jiggers for quite a while.Using them allows these swimming lures to 'swing' the most when the lure settles back down after the jigging up motion.They do allow quick change of baits,too.Otherwise,I tie a barrel swivel about a foot up the line, to take care of line twist when using other lures,spoons,etc.Chubby darters I tie directly on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't trust tying direct to split rings when using light lines. I've had the line get into the split of the ring and work its way around, then off comes your $2-$6 lure.

I use a small snap at the lure and a small swivel 18" up the line when using any lures with action to them.

When tying to a hook eye with a plain hook or an ice jig or the like then I tie direct. I often use the Non-Slip Loop Knot, aka Rapala Knot, which allows the lure to hang and move more freely than a clinch knot will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use the small and medium sized "Fas-Snaps" I like them alot, very small and tons of action. The small size is a BEAR to attach smaller jigs to unless you use a needlenose or forecepts to grasp onto the snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with sodajerk. It depends more on the given situation. But the knot itself is very important as well. Surgeons Loop or Rapala Knot are great for tying directly yet still allowing for all the intended movement of the jig.

I even use those knots to tie on my snaps and swivels to make certain I have every amount of movement possible.

Bigger baits = swivels and snaps

Smaller baits/plain hooks = tie direct

IMO anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the medium "fas-snaps" for my two larger jigging rods (walleye). For smaller panfish jigs I tie direct. I don't use a swivel snap unless I'm fishing with spoon.

Some tackle is designed to be used without a snap, some is designed to by tied direct... then there's the debate of which knot to use. The "Rapala knot" for example, creates a loop, whereas the common "improved clinch" holds tightly to the eye of the jig. You can even adjust the angle of the line where it meets the jig with a tight knot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Tying direct opens the possiblities of inticing those negative fish. Less hardware is pretty much always better. Yes the snaps and swivels would help in rod storage and orgainzation of lures but isn't it really about the actual fishing?

I'll never forget being at this park at a local lake and seeing a guy and his girl fishing from the dock along with this other younger boy who did not appear to be with them. My dog and I go down to see how their doing. The guy and his girl appear to be in their mid to late thirties and the kid probably around 9 or 10. The guy couldn't understand why they were not catching fish while just 10 yards away this kid was catching fish after fish. Turns out this guy had a rather larger snap swivel attached to a oversized hook loaded with a gob of nigtcrawler while the kid had no swivel and a small hook with a wax worm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: stfcatfish
Unless I'm using total finesse gear with ultralight line for very shy pannies (pretty rare), I always put on a black crosslock snap (not including swivel.) Ease of changing lures isn't the bigger deal for me. The snap allows a LOT more freedom of lure movement than any knot, and I do just as well with the snap fishing next to folks tying directly to the lure. Since most of my jigging lures twist the line, I also put a black ball-bearing swivel about 2 feet to 3 feet up the line, and then put a fluoro leader in the same test as my main line between the swivel and the snap.

I'm in with ya on this style stfcatfish, But I use the Barrel swivel(to prevent linetwist)2-3 ft. above & then tie on the jig/hook/lure with a loose knot to get action. (I'd use the snap swivels more, but I worry that it's just one more connection that might fail)

This is a good thread , Keep up the posts. I like seeing the different syles you all use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could go either way, depends on what the fish wants.

Typically direct tie is the more stealthy approach to entice negative fish. However if your jig is spinning in circles, it'll really put the fish on negative and a swivel will make the difference. When I go deep water the chance for jig spinning in circles increases and the need for a swivel is much higher. Typically in 10 fow or less I direct tie mostly. Sometimes the smallest of jigs needs that little extra weight and a bb shot lead is too heavy a swivel is the better choice. You get the extra weight as well as preventing line twist.

Snap swivels on spoons can change the action of them, typically making them flutter more. At times it's the fluttering action on the fall that triggers the strike. At other times it's a less fluttering that triggers the strike and that warrants a direct tie on.

Swivels don't really eliminate line twist, they do preven a lot of line twist from the lure from messing things up. The other line twisting comes from your reel on the wind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • By The way that didn't work either!! Screw it I'll just use the cellular. 
    • It’s done automatically.  You might need an actual person to clear that log in stuff up.   Trash your laptop history if you haven’t tried that already.
    • 😂 yea pretty amazing how b o o b i e s gets flagged, but they can't respond or tell me why I  can't get logged in here on my laptop but I can on my cellular  😪
    • I grilled some brats yesterday, maybe next weekend will the next round...  
    • You got word censored cuz you said        B o o b ies….. haha.   Yeah, no… grilling is on hiatus for a bit.
    • Chicken mine,  melded in Mccormick poultry seasoning for 24 hours.  Grill will get a break till the frigid temps go away!
    • we had some nice weather yesterday and this conundrum was driving me crazy  so I drove up to the house to take another look. I got a bunch of goodies via ups yesterday (cables,  winch ratchet parts, handles, leaf springs etc).   I wanted to make sure the new leaf springs I got fit. I got everything laid out and ready to go. Will be busy this weekend with kids stuff and too cold to fish anyway, but I will try to get back up there again next weekend and get it done. I don't think it will be bad once I get it lifted up.    For anyone in the google verse, the leaf springs are 4 leafs and measure 25 1/4" eye  to eye per Yetti. I didnt want to pay their markup so just got something else comparable rated for the same weight.   I am a first time wheel house owner, this is all new to me. My house didn't come with any handles for the rear cables? I was told this week by someone in the industry that cordless drills do not have enough brake to lower it slow enough and it can damage the cables and the ratchets in the winches.  I put on a handle last night and it is 100% better than using a drill, unfortatenly I found out the hard way lol and will only use the ICNutz to raise the house now.
    • I haven’t done any leaf springs for a long time and I can’t completely see the connections in your pics BUT I I’d be rounding up: PB Blaster, torch, 3 lb hammer, chisel, cut off tool, breaker bar, Jack stands or blocks.   This kind of stuff usually isn’t the easiest.   I would think you would be able to get at what you need by keeping the house up with Jack stands and getting the pressure off that suspension, then attack the hardware.  But again, I don’t feel like I can see everything going on there.
    • reviving an old thread due to running into the same issue with the same year of house. not expecting anything from yetti and I already have replacement parts ordered and on the way.   I am looking for some input or feedback on how to replace the leaf springs themselves.    If I jack the house up and remove the tire, is it possible to pivot the axel assembly low enough to get to the other end of the leaf spring and remove that one bolt?   Or do I have to remove the entire pivot arm to get to it? Then I also have to factor in brake wire as well then. What a mess   My house is currently an hour away from my home at a relatives, going to go back up and look it over again and try to figure out a game plan.           Above pic is with house lowered on ice, the other end of that leaf is what I need to get to.   above pic is side that middle bolt broke and bottom 2 leafs fell out here is other side that didnt break but you can see bottom half of leaf already did but atleast bolt is still in there here is hub assembly in my garage with house lowered and tires off when I put new tires on it a couple months ago. hopefully I can raise house high enough that it can drop down far enough and not snap brake cable there so I can get to that other end of the leaf spring.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.