muskybuck Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I saw that they are working on putting a little video camera in the rear end of a lure, the line is a fibre optic cord to transmitt the picture up to a little screen mounted in the face of the bait caster reel. you will be able to watch a fish chasing your lure from behind and then biting the lure. Is this maybe going too far? Will anything be going to far? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deitz Dittrich Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I cant even imagine how much it would cost to run that much fiber optic cable to double it as fishing line.. yikes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiLBro Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 that was in a magazine. the article was titled "2010: a fishing odessy" or something like that. i think the only hard part about that whole thing would be the fiber optik cable that doubles as line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JP Z Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I don't foresee that happening anytime soon. Especially when in reading the article they mention the fiber itself is about $600. The camera would be very easy though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunflint Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I would like to offer my services in a field test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNUser Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 Who knows, there maybe something better than and cheaper than fiber by then. With as fast as technology advances, what we think of small and fast might be huge and slow in 4 years.I have run many fiber runs and can remember when it was just not possible due to the cost involved. Now look, we run miles of it and that was not long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surface Tension Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 We already have the technology to go wireless so fiber optic cable isn't needed. Might get costly though when Mr. Toothis-Interuptis bites you off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice9 Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 Did anybody see the little remote control boat that tows your lure around? I saw it at the show then saw the guys, I guess they're the inventors/marketers, playing (working?) on them in the lagoons at Wayzata. The lurecam might be the newest thing but this is a thing that is happening now.I had no interest...would you?ice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrKen Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 How fast can you swim and what rapala do you bite on best. sorry, couldn't resist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I saw the remote control boat at the show, too. I thought it was stupid. If you can't cast and need a remote to place your bait/lure where you want it, you shouldn't be fishing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upnorth Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 What happen to just hook, line and a sinker? Cripes, I fish to escape some of the trappings of phones, pagers, PDAs, cell phones. Kinda keep things sorta simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpj5br Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 This sounds crazy, but I've been working on the cam-in-the-lure for quite some time.The fiber strand embedded in either mono or braid is not a problem, that exists already (in fact, it doesn't even have to be fiber, but that works best in the line for fishing purposes, less kinking, etc), and such a small diameter cable is required for this low bandwidth application that it is not even a cost factor.My biggest problem has been with "tying" the line to a lure. It works if you use just a single lure integrated into the line of course, but that's not very feasible (and it impedes the lure action), you'd have to have a different rod/reel setup for every lure.The real "invention" aspect of this lies in securing the line to the lure, some type of clip/plug interface that has enough tensile strength to not give when a fish hits, but is also easily and quickly changable, and doesn't affect the action of the lure.It's a bit of a challenge...Rick, I agree wireless would totally solve the problem (we'd have it today, in fact), BUT at the frequencies and wattage the FCC allows, it will not make the leap from water to air and maintain the signal. If there were no FCC, we'd be in business. I should also mention that with the wireless approach, you'd also have to have a battery in the lure, with fiber, no batteries are necessary.I think the article you refer to was in Field and Stream's 110th anniversary fishing addition. Most of the big-name lure companies have working prototypes of this, minus the lure attachment/changability, whoever comes up with that little 1/100th ounce patent will be in good shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishingmike0770 Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I believe i also read this article and the whole idea was to put a camara on the back of the lure and then wirelesslly transmit the signal to a small screen on the reel. $$$$$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muddog Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 I'm looking forward to seeing some of these shot on the TV shows. I have seen the cannon ball cam on Salmon fishing shows But seeing a muskie come out of the weeds and inhale the cam. That would be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts