Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Vikings Stadium Design & Construction


toughguy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I like it. With all the windows and light it has an open feel! The heck with an open air stadium. It gets really cold up here. The vikes can and will play at the open aired gophers field while this gets built.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm liking what I see. The glass door idea is cool and inventive. Sounds like they have vents on the opposite side to allow cross winds/ventiliation.

I've been in a couple retractable roof stadiums. They are okay. I actually like this a little better.

As steep as the roof is, I'm still wondering if the snow will slide off properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me crazy, but I actually like it! It has a modern and unique look to it. I know some old school guys will rip it for looking like a greenhouse, or whatever, but it is really neat. I might actually have some interest in going to a game in the new stadium. The dome is just hideous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Move there then. Nobody is stopping you. Then you can cheer for nothing. Because that's what ND is full of.

Stadium looks pretty fresh. I'm excited to see it put into motion. Sure it still has a roof. They plan on using it for more than just football. Because more happens in Minneapolis than just a football game for 17 weeks out of the year. Unlike Green Bay. A giant city that has absolutely nothing going on

+1

At least Ziggy is getting a nice venue for the 400 or so Million he/they are shelling out.

Life is good 2 years of out-door Football followed by this marvel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like some folks are still upset about the stadium financing. Which, I can understand to a degree, but I think you also have to consider the alternative.

Put it this way, if you want (insert favorite band here) to come and play a concert in your favorite town, you need to have a suitable venue for them to come and perform at. They are not going to play a venue that seats 5,000 when for the same effort and set list when they can play a venue that seats 50,000. (I know I took some liberty's here, bear with me) and make 10 times as much money.

The same principles applies to football or any other athletic entertainment. That's part of the benefit of living in well rounded state/city.

To the other posters comment, if you don't provide these venue's, you end up with ND or IA. Not knocking those states, they have great things to offer, but it's different. Minnesota values a broad offering of entertainment. Fine arts, music, food, and for the last 20+ years, mediocre sports. : )

Like my dad says, if you want to play, you have to pay.

Given what we spend on tackle, licenses, boats, etc. Spending $20 a piece a year for a contemporary, suitable stadium is peanuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Along with will the snow fall in a safe area, and not onto people walking around the building?

They will have avalanche warning lights and do "controlled" blasts using the Nordic horn to relieve excess snow load. Hopefully we will have a "kick a$$" offense so the "normal" playing of the horn following a Viking score is sufficient and they do not have to enact legislation to conduct these horn blowings without a score. This would result in mass chaos.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like my dad says, if you want to play, you have to pay.

He should tell that to Zygi Wilf then.

smirk

BTW, there is a fundamental difference between 'want' and 'need'. A new palace for a billionaire is nothing more than a 'want'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I enjoy the fact that a rich person is benefitting from something that I and the rest of us help fund? NOPE.

The alternative is not building the stadium, Wilf selling the team and the new owner moving the team.

What would that cost the state? Far more than anteing up the $400M for the new stadium IMO.

State would lose revenues from sales tax at local establishments, players income tax, which last time I had seen it the state made in excess of $20M annually off player salary alone.

What would be cut from the budget to circumvent this shortfall in annual revenue?

No doubt Wilf comes out good on this, but the state and city of Mpls have a lot to lose if it didnt happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing I'm hearing tossed around is the large financial commitment from the Wilf family. The Wilf's paying $477 million is a total joke.

From Patrick Reusse, 1500 ESPN

We in the Twin Cities sports media were so amped up over getting a new stadium for the Vikings and thus maintaining them as a subject to write and talk about that not much time was spent looking at the financial realities.

We have allowed owner Zygi Wilf to be crowned as a patient, generous hero in the proceedings that led to the approval of the stadium on Thursday in the State Legislature. Gov. Mark Dayton did more than anyone to overcome the political odds against this thing and gain approval for the stadium, yet he was effusive in his praise of Wilf at the victory news conference.

Of course, it's in the best interest of Dayton and all other political supporters to send along the message that getting the extra $50 million from the team was the result of driving a hard bargain with the Vikings.

Listen, I was on board with this _ for the same biased reasons as other people making their living in the sports media _ but more so because of this belief:

That an active downtown Minneapolis is the most-important element in maintaining a vibrant metropolitan area.

The truth is that at the new number for the team share, $477 million, this remains a marvelous deal for Wilf and the Vikings. These tycoons always borrow the millions they put into stadium deals, so that they can use the interest on the debt as a write off against the new profits.

And in the case of Zygi, much more than with the Pohlads and Target Field, the new profits are going to be enormous _ with the combination of higher prices everywhere in the stadium, fabulous new suites and thousands of other premium seats.

Consider this: The Twins were able to pick up an extra $6 million with the $2,000 per seat, upfront license fee for the 3,000-seat Legends Club at Target Field. Can you imagine the ease with which Zygi will be able to collect greater upfront license fees for premium seats in the new stadium?

I'm estimating an average of $4,000 for 10,000 premium seats (not suites) in the coffers before the new stadium opens. That's $40 million in the Vikings' coffers.

The Vikings also received the entire take from naming rights. I've asked Twins officials and other sports executives what the Vikings can expect as an annual fee for naming rights and was told: "Seven million, maybe eight.''

Put it at $7 million annually and that's $210 million over a 30-year lease.

Zygi will be getting $200 million of his $477 million from the NFL. When he borrows the other $277 million and starts paying it back, these calculations say he can call on $40 million upfront in seat license and another $210 million along the way in naming rights to help with the bank payments.

And there's also a difference between the myth and the reality of the $200 million "loan'' the Vikings claim to be getting from the NFL.

We've accepted the Vikings' description of it as a loan, when in reality Zygi is getting a grant from the NFL, as pointed out by Neil deMause on his "Field of Schemes'' HSOforum back in late December.

DeMause reported that this was what was approved by an NFL owners meeting when it came to the league helping to finance new stadiums. He broke it into three parts:

*The new loan program _ which actually will be called "G-4" - ups the maximum loan level from $150 million per team under the old plan to a maximum of $200 million under the new one.

*As under G-3, teams can repay the loan with club seat money THEY NORMALLY WOULD HAVE HAD TO SHARE WITH THE LEAGUE. They can now also use incremental regular ticket revenue, defined as the difference between ticket sales in the new stadium and average sales in the last three years of the old one.

*"The project must not involve any relocation of or change in an affected club's 'home territory.'" (Note: So Zygi wouldn't have able to get this $200 million from the NFL if he had relocated the team).

DeMause added: Teams looking to build new stadiums without paying for them themselves are, naturally, thrilled - since this is money that they wouldn't normally get to keep anyway. it's effectively a grant, not a loan.

DeMause also quoted Vikings stadium lobbyist Lester Bagley as calling the NFL's $200 million "great news for the team and our fans.''

Bagley changed his view somewhat over the $200 million in the final weeks of successful stadium maneuvering, depicting it more as simply a loan than a handout paid back through revenues that the Vikings would have been sending to the NFL anyway as part of revenue sharing.

Add it up - naming rights, license fees, NFL grant _ and you have $450 million of Zygi's $477 million. That doesn't seem to be much suffering for a fellow now being depicted as the patient martyr of stadium negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fill us in.....Why is it a total joke?

Because some blowhard media jackel said it was?...

grin

Quote:
The one thing I'm hearing tossed around is the large financial commitment from the Wilf family

No thats just more spin the Vikings are coming up with 477 million and 13 million a year in rent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see unemployment is up again in MN. Maybe we can hire them to wash the windows on the Billionaire's palace that we bought for him.

It makes the stadium that much more enjoyable knowing it drives you nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you had quoted pretty much anyone else besides Reusse I would have listened.

He's a jacka$$ and worse the Sid.

Whether he borrows the money, gets the money in the form of naming rights or whatever, he is STILL PAYING THE MONEY.

He could play a guitar in the skyways for tipes for all I care, its coming from him and any loan from the NFL must be paid back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.