Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

NHL offers NHLPA 50/50 Split


OnAFly

Recommended Posts

This is contingent on a Nov 2 start date to a condensed 82 game season and includes NO SALARY ROLLBACK!

If the NHLPA does not accept then they are completely nuts. At this point, I might have to switch over permanently to college hockey. Hopefully they understand that not taking this agreement would make them look terrible. Though, with Fehr at the helm, you never know what they will try and do. mad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get this deal done NHLPA. As PA mentioned on the radio, this lockout is getting no buzz whatsoever. Its almost as if the NHL has completely faded from people's minds, at least as far as National coverage goes.

Not a ton of damage done if they can sign the deal and drop the puck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Its almost as if the NHL has completely faded from people's minds, at least as far as National coverage goes.

I think it has.

isn't it always an 82 game season? By condenced do they mean less days off and more back to backs? My vote would be to just cancel the missed games so the Wild have less games to get hurt in and more chance they are healthy in the 2nd half..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No possible way they "players lawyers" take this deal and that big of a hit. And as much as I want to watch NHL Hockey, frankly, I don't blame them.

Wouldn't say there is no possible way they take this deal. Now is when they would normally start getting paychecks. They wan't to play and stop losing money.

Get it done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, looking at the player group, the ones who need the money the least are the ones off in Europe still making money. They 3rd/4th liners are stuck back here hoping that they can get back on the ice and make some money before their careers' are over.

BTW - The 82 game season is an incentive for these players. It means they lose nothing. It's also good for the owners and businesses that gain from the games too. Hopefully this can get done and we can see all 82 games, if nothing else, for the sake of all those small businesses near the X that are hurting from this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is crazy how everyone has already forgot about the NHL.

The players are getting a steal with this deal. I don't understand what right they have to to strike anyway. I'll do that at my corporate office and I bet it goes real well. A bunch of greedy players putting the burden on concession workers, bartenders and janitors. All for what, to let don fehr build up his ego. They still never counter offered on the first 4 proposals. This is a joke. So now they will decline the offer, for money they get through escrow anyway, the will hold the new league alignment hostage to bargain for longer contracts..........

They better accept, if they don't I hope they cancel the season. I'd rather watch the gophs anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lost faith in the PA when the hired Donald Fehr. He only cares about the people he's representing. He needs to also take into account the fans.

I read his comments on the latest proposal and he's questioning what the owners are giving up. Seriously?!?

What will the players be gaining if teams start folding because they are losing too much money??? Fehr is a F#@%#%@D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree. He would seek a deal which would end the NHL in a year if he could get the players another dime tomorrow.

The players were giving statements today that sounded suspiciously Fehr-like. I'm sure if he weren't there, there would be hockey right now and the players would still be making millions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the NHL to negoitiate through the media is completely wrong. My guess is Fehr has them running scared and this is the only way they can make the players look bad and get the fans on their side.. Giving up a yr on salary arbitration, maximum lenght of a contract is 5 yrs, age 28 or 8 yrs to become a free agent are a lot for the players to give up. The league made 3.3 billion dollars. I don't see a real need for the 50/50 split immediately. Why not lower it 1% each year until it reaches 50/50. For those who don't like Fehr, he is getting paid to represent the players and get them the best deal possible, I bet the NHL wishes he was representing them and not Bettman. I don't think most of the owners made their millions worrying about their employees,fans and other businesses that count on games, only the bottom line! If the owners wouldn't have locked the players out we would have hockey from day 1 and negotiating could have continued, which is what the players wanted. Greedy owners are the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is the NHL negotiating through the media? Neither side has been willing to talk to the media about negotiation details. Both sides have released details about their proposals only after the the other side has had a chance to go through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been with the owners the whole way, most of the teams are hurting and its not a revenue problem. I also don't think the players should lose a dime on their current contracts, the teams signed them and they should honor them. The 50/50 split is fair, that is the biggest issue, 12+ year contracts are just plain stupid and need to end, they should be able to find some middle ground on the rest of the issues. Lets get the season fired up already. NHL already plays a distant 2nd to college hockey and the state tournament in my book, don't make me push you further down the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see how you could be for the owners on this? They are the ones that found loopholes in the present CBA. They signed the players to rediculous contracts, both money and the length of contracts. They forced the lockout both times. They continually want more of the revenue, but are unwilling to show some fiscal discipline. Now they want more rules to control themslves at the players expense. Like I said before, these owners did not become billionaires by losing their money, they may have lost money on paper, but not out of their wallet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preaching fiscal discipline is all well and good, but you and I both know for a fact that if one player signs a crazy contract, that contract becomes standard. Not standard to the owners. Not standard to the GMs. It becomes standard to the next player signing a contract.

Player agents are a part of this too. If the players want to make more, keep the sport healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mule

I kind of see your ponit but let me ask you should the Wild have passed on Parise and Suter because of their crazy contracts? They paid market price and by all accound those players could have gotton more money if they wanted. A system needs to be in place to control what owners and gm's can do, otherwise they are forced to spend out of control to stay competative. When a player hit free agency they are in complete control, if you don't pay top dollar most of the time they will land with the team that does.

On top of everythign all the other pro sports are near a 50/50 split, I see no reason why NHL players should be getting 57%. If the system isn't fixed there is no doubt in my mind some teams will start to fold, all of the sudden that 50/50 split is looking pretty good when there are 50 to 100 less NHL jobs for the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fehr is just plain crazy. Everyone was all abuzz about some serious progress from the latest NHL offer. Even players were excited. But a $0.3M loss from average 2.4 to 2.1M salary is too much to handle I guess. They are going to counter propose this afternoon and I can gaurantee they will offer a 50/50 split at the END of the 6-7 yr CBA. So kind of a ramp down of the player splits from today's 57% to the 50%. This will not work so many teams deep in the red. Contraction of the leauge would then be almost necessary. Contraction would be disastrous for players as many of the 3/4 line players fall off the back end (think minor league teams too).

Sadly I think we are just a hair closer to a deal than we were a week ago, which is to say not very close. Up until this point, it was all a game. A full season could still have been played, very little if any revenue falling off the table.

If it goes beyond Oct 25th, the Winter Classic will be lost and with it a huge chunk of revenue. Every game that is lost will hurt the little guys and the fans more than it will the owners and players. Think of all the businesses and employees that depend on a 41 game home schedule. They're making a working man's wage, not millions.

I have always been a fan of the NHL, but if this goes on much longer I'm getting more and more disgusted. The greed has become so evident that it's not worth my time. Hail College Hockey!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that a 50/50/ is agreeable. If the owners truely cared about the league they won't have used the loopholes to sign players at rediculous contracts. The owners locked the players out and cancelled a whole season before the last CBA was signed and the players took a 24% cut. Now they want them to take a 12-15% cut. They want more money escrowed, longer time to become an unrestricted free agent, length of contract to 5 years. We are not talking about a league that is losing money(3.3 billion profit). Really don't want to hear that it is the players or agents fault for the rediculous contracts that the owners continued to give right up to the lockout. Bettman was even taken back by these actions, pretty hard to cry wolf when owners continue to act like thay do. If the owners really cared about anything but the bottom line, there would be no lockout. I think it was great what the Wild did and they must have felt they could afford these contracts. Nobody wants to see teams lost, especially the players, if the owners get a 50/50 split, which is 7% more than now, I would think the league would be extemely healthy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how some people confuse revenue with profits. Don't forget to net out expenses. There are some owners that make no money. Actually there are a couple that loose money still. To a player that revenue share is all profit, to the owners there is still expenses. These owners have no way to bargain anymore if they don't make these ridiculous deals and contracts. We complain when we don't sign parise and sutter and now mule complains when. We do sign them.

I don't think Donald fehr is even doing what's best for the players. He is doing this for his own glory. These players need to quit saying they care about the fans, they obviously only care about the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.