Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Lockout


Bear55

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At this point I think the owners are dug in. From their perspective I don't think a lockout would alienate the fans much more than what has already been done. I quit following all the latest proposals but if they truly are only $182M apart split it and get it done.

At this point I think the players buckle or there is no season.

On the bright side, maybe we'll have more people on the college hockey boards!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've been understanding from one of my co-workers that's a ref... the local rink has been packed with people for games lately.. If anything this lock-out is only helping local small time hockey... people need their fix so they are going to the local games instead of sitting on their lazyboy watching some goons make more money in one day then they'll make in their entire lives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Bill Daly and Steve Fehr addressed the media late Tuesday night after over seven hours of negotiation between a select group of players and owners in New York.

This is the first time that the two sides have addressed the media side-by-side during the negotiation process. Fehr admitted that there is still much work to be done, and the same group will convene again on Wednesday morning before the 11:00am EST Board of Governors meeting. Gary Bettman is also expected to hold a press conference tomorrow at 1:00pm EST. Stay tuned tomorrow for updates on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daniel Alfredsson says he cannot understand what Commissioner Gary Bettman and the N.H.L. owners are trying to accomplish with their lockout.

“Last time around we knew what the league wanted — they had to get a cap,” Alfredsson said Saturday night. “This time around I have a hard time seeing what their game plan is.”

Alfredsson, speaking in the dressing room after Operation Hat Trick, a charity game in Atlantic City to benefit families affected by Hurricane Sandy, has not been alone in wondering why Bettman and the owners are risking their profitable business by remaining intransigent in negotiations despite the sides being so close on so many key issues.

Alfredsson calls that “the frustrating part” of the lockout. He was on the players’ association negotiating committee during the 2004-5 lockout, which resulted in the cancellation of the entire season. But that lockout made sense in that the N.H.L. was losing money and the owners could financially afford to sacrifice a season in an effort to get the players to accept a salary cap.

Now, however, the N.H.L. is a $3.3 billion business, and increasingly profitable. Bettman said last week that the lockout was costing the league $18 million to $20 million a day in lost revenue, roughly half of which would have gone to the owners. That comes to about $700 million the owners have lost so far.

The lockout has also angered sponsors, with the head of Molson Coors saying the company will seek reimbursement from the N.H.L.

Yet Bettman and the owners seem intent on continuing it, even though the two sides are close enough for a quick resolution.

They have gotten the players to agree to a 50-50 revenue split, leaving one substantial difference on economics: the owners have offered $211 million in deferred pay to “make whole” existing contracts over five years, while the players have asked for $393 million.

That $182 million gap works out to about $1.2 million per team, per year over the proposed five-year deal — or about the cost of a third-line forward.

The sides are also split on contract rights, but even those differences seem relatively minor in comparison to what the owners risk by losing a whole season. The owners want to add a year to both the age and the length of service a player must achieve in order to qualify for free agency (28 instead of 27, and eight years’ experience instead of seven). The owners also want to limit contracts to five years, and the players seem willing to accept something closer to seven- or eight-year limit.

Yet the owners have not budged on those issues since the initial proposal they made over the summer.

“Player contracting rights are vital on the players’ side,” Donald Fehr, the executive director of the players’ association, said Saturday. “So far we don’t have a recognition of that.”

Union officials have wondered whether Bettman and the owners have a date in mind at which they will rake in the concessions they have won, compromise on unresolved issues and move to a quick settlement. Perhaps answering Alfredsson’s question as to the owners’ strategy.

If there is such a date, it could be Dec. 5, when the N.H.L. Board of Governors convenes in New York for its annual meeting.

If the governors inform Bettman then that they want to settle, the season could start within a couple of weeks.

Under those circumstances, the hundreds of millions of dollars the owners will have lost would simply be the cost of doing business.

Save

E-mail

Share

Print

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Now, however, the N.H.L. WAS a $3.3 billion business, and increasingly profitable. Bettman said last week that the lockout was costing the league $18 million to $20 million a day in lost revenue, roughly half of which would have gone to the owners. That comes to about $700 million the owners have lost so far.

There we go.. Fixed that part.. Or at least will be more relevant once this season is washed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a deal is real close now...today or tomorrow it'll be announced.

It's been rumored that Bettman has requested this deal is done one way or another by Dec 7th.

"kelly hrudy just said on team 1040 in vancouver that the players threatened the owners last night that if this entire process blows up, that certain players and high profile players will refuse to re sign with their current clubs."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the amount of Press the lockout gets, I'm suprised any of the teams have any fans in the seats. Sure seems like the major sports outlets could care less about "ice" hockey.

Yes, they now call it "ice" hockey, because Field hockey is soooo popular <roll eyes>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should take what the owners offer, or go get a real job. When they get paid for playing a kids game, why do they want so much. Get a real job for awhile and you will wish you were playing hockey. Get rid of Donald Fehr, and let the players vote on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.