Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Musky Buck

Could we almost do HIP with deer hunting ?

21 posts in this topic

Just a thought and I feel for the retailers that have to HIP us when they have long lines at the check out counter. Could the DNR get any valuable information if they asked each license purchaser of deer like are you for or against baiting ? Maybe just 1 question per season to see what the hunters feel as a whole. Maybe ask us if we would support EAB or other questions, I know the rigamoral(sp) this might add on to getting your license but 1 question a year and we might get a better full state idea rather than a bunch of us taking the either or side of our states deer hunting concerns or issues, just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they should develope a survey and send it out to all who purchased a licenes for that year.

I think they should do this with all types of hunting and fishing management decisions to get a true feel of what people want and give the stakeholders (us) a little say in the matter!

my $.02 anyway.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they should develope a survey and send it out to all who purchased a licenes for that year.

I think they should do this with all types of hunting and fishing management decisions to get a true feel of what people want and give the stakeholders (us) a little say in the matter!

my $.02 anyway.....

From what I gather response rates to these kinds of surveys are ussually very low. Also, I would guess that there would be a hike in licence cost if they were to do that. Making, sending and reviewing 500,000 surveys could get quite spendy.

I would be in favor of a few questions, similar to hip when I bought the licence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand that, however, I think if it were a once every 5 years or so type thing and having questions that may impact our hunting/fishing it may get more people on board to cooperate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The DNR makes tons of money off deer licenses, they just choose to spend it on everything else. I don't think its too much to ask to use some of the money to survey the hunters to see what direction we want to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get both email & mail surveys from Nebraska and S.D. after every license I've purchased. I always respond or mail them in. It also gives you hunter/harvest information that I find very useful. I've never received a single survey in that state of MN. One mass email after each season would be a good cost effective way to gather hunter responses to changes in regulation and deer harvest. That's not asking for much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the only thing i see coming up is if they ask a question like are you for or against baiting, they may take a look at your hunting ground from above to find illegal bait if you answer for it. maybe not though.

would be a good idea though, i mean how many of us have to tell a cashier what our zip code is when buying something about anywhere. one little question doesn't hold up the checkout lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think they don't have a contact the DNR e-mail site on there web page? They don"t want our input just our license money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

first off, that makes too much sense and in order for them to implement such an idea they'll have to study it for a 3 year period at a cost of thousands. just think how much it cost for the 2 or 3 questions for the purchase of the smallgame liscense. second, if they don't agree with the result of the questionaire they'll do what they wan't anyway and lie to you about the results just like any other government burocracy. they don't work for what the sportsman want because they're smarter than we are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Growing up on a farm I can tell you this the DNR is more interested in what the farmers are seeing. Because there the guys out there all day and night. For the last three years at least one of us have been stoped by a CO and asked if they could ride along and ask some questions. Mostly about what we've seen for deer and phesants. He will take notes and listen to what you think. As far as the HIP idea I think it is great. I think I can afford one minute of my time to give some helpful info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think they don't have a contact the DNR e-mail site on there web page? They don"t want our input just our license money.

You mean like the "contact us" link with multiple options of emails, telephone numbers, and the Central Office address at the upper right of their HSOforum?

Are we going to change deer hunting to a a participatory democracy and throw the biologists and statisticians out? I'm afraid we wouldn't have much of a deer herd left or hunter satisfaction would be even poorer if things worked that way.

As has been pointed out, there are numerous errors, biases, and flaws in surveys, survey responses, ELS vendors asking questions, etc. I'm all for getting your voice heard, so contact the DNR, fill out the surveys they had online the past two years when the opportunities come around again, join MDHA and let them go to the table for you. If you're unhappy, let them know! Don't just wait for them to ask you, for them to send you a letter, or for them to give you a phone call.

Waterfowl HIP and the setting of regulations for each year's state's hunting dates, seasons, and bags are modeled from HIP, band recoveries, and most heavily, from aerial surveys and more current population estimates. Deer herd population estimates aren't done in the same way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

D'oh! I forgot about emails...... Even better!

Hey, Lou....ya reading this? winkgrin

Yea, yea ... about contacting the DNR on the homepage. Upper right hand corner has a link that says 'contact us'. Lower right hand corner says:

Questions?

1-888-MINNDNR

651-296-6157 in metro

info@dnr.state.mn.us

So, it's easy and listed twice on the home page.

Regarding the other stuff,

1 - ELS questions. I'm not a fan and I don't think they yield useful information. How many people have been asked about venison donation, HIP waterfowl harvest, or fishing questions? While your local small business agent may do a fantastic job, most licenses are sold at big box retailers and they don't ask the questions. In fact, the UMN did a comparison study on the fishing questions and found that in the majority of cases, the agent just punches 'no'. What they did was send random surveys to fishing license buyers and asked the same questions. They then compared the survey answers with what they allegedly said during the license transaction. Completely different results.

2 - Surveys. I am a HUGE fan of random mail surveys and use them quite often. Recently, we've been surveying early antlerless and special hunt participants as part of the alternative deer management project. We also did a big survey in 2005 looking at regulatory acceptance and we've sent 1,000 surveys a year to regular season hunters to gauge their opinions on issues. The problem is mail surveys are expensive and I always hear is 'I never get a survey'. With 500,000 hunters your individual odds of getting a survey are quite low but that doesn't mean your opinions are reflected. Think about presidential elections with +/- 4% and they only surveyed 800 people It's the law of diminishing returns in that you don't need to survey everyone to gauge opinion - 1,000 people is plenty (look up stratified random sample). As for the Dakota's and annual surveys, remember, they don't have mandatory registration like we do in Minnesota. So, my guess is they surveys hunters every year to gauge harvest and they may ask a few other questions because it's going out anyway (I don't know, I've never seen one of their surveys). Most states are moving away from estimating harvest via surveys and going to phone-in registration (e.g., Iowa). The main problem with mail (or phone) surveys for harvest is they over estimate total harvest because of something called response bias, which is a fancy term for 'hunters lie'. Nobody likes to admit they were unsuccessful so surveys always estimate high and oftentimes need to be corrected down.

3 - Email/phone numbers. They're not collected at the terminal. Certainly email could be useful (although they change) and it would be much quicker and easier to survey hunters if email was available. I'm not sure if the new system will collect that information. Several institutions are going to random surveys delivered online but DNR hasn't done that yet because we don't have emails.

4 - The internet. I've gotten more and more into using the web to get public input information. The 2 issues I can think of right now is the deer goal setting project that was done a couple years ago and the simplification recommendations from last spring. In both cases, there were presentations and a survey on the web for people to fill out. These are typically advertised through DNR news releases, Outdoor News, and other printed media.

HOWEVER, we need to make a distinction between random surveys and public input because the 2 are different. For example, if I ask 1,000 archers if the deer season should be moved to mid-November, 95% will say yes. If I pose the same question to gun-only hunters 70% will say no. The only way to obtain the true percentage (+/- 4%) would be to send a random survey to 1,000 hunters. Some will be archers, some will be gun hunters, and some will do both. Make sense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just sometimes wonder when you hear about what our states hunters wish list is and then wonder, who are the hunters getting surveyed or who or how do they get that information when I don't know any hunters ever asked the question at hand. I understand there is no perfect system. I just wish we'd get a little more than we shot about 250,000 deer this year. There is no easy answer, but I wish we'd get a little more information somehow. I would like to see a county by county breakdown of deer registrations, maybe it's out there already, I would like to see how other regions of the state fair vs. other counties, maybe I'd like to know too much, but it would be fascinating to me to see how many lets say bowhunt ottertail county vs. wadena county etc. What county do you deer hunt most often ? Stuff like that. Thanks for the input, M.B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is just about everything you want to know for the 2007 season. It broken up by permit area, not county however.

There are a bunch of other things to look at under the "maps and stats" heading here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to what black bay said, if you go the second archive page (click link at bottom of the first) you can get stats back to 1997

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Think we should change the topic to "Trump for Trees."
    • Had to go all the way back to Missouri to hunt in the snow this year! Beautiful morning but not much movement. Did see some late rut activity Friday.
    • Dotch, you guys over there are almost famous....   Almost because it is Waseca, but whatever.    Mark Seeley's weather blog... http://blog-weathertalk.extension.umn.edu/   .... Waseca now reports 54.13 inches of precipitation for 2016 and this is a new statewide annual precipitation record, surpassing the old one of 53.52" at St Francis (Anoka County) in 1991.
      ....   And an interesting thought...(from Mark, not me) Commentary on Winter TIME: No question will be answered this week, but I want to take TIME to make a comment about Winter TIME. Managing the TIME in the Winter Season in Minnesota is a different ball game than other seasons of the year, because everything takes longer. No question winter will be felt more frequently soon in the daily weather, and snowfalls will become more frequent this month. The rash of bicycle, pedestrian, and vehicular accidents reported during the snow storms towards the end of November reminded me about adjusting for Winter TIME. Our concept of time needs to be adjusted. Lengthen the time intervals that you have intuitively built-into your everyday habits and tasks. It takes longer to walk places, longer to drive places, longer to dress and undress, longer to warm up the car, longer to degomble (shed snow) when you come into the house. You need to make time to shovel snow, scrape the windshield, clean the furnace filters, When you walk take shorter steps and not too fast...put the boots, gloves and hat on when you go outside....check on the neighbor if their place hasn't been shoveled...everything should slow down..except for the long Minnesota goodbye..that is better shortened...just say goodbye, open the door, leave and close the door behind you....no need to stand in an open doorway for minutes conversing about last minute stuff. Winter TIME is an adjustment that may save you anxiety, regret, or even injury.
    • Would you use a bobber on your rattle reel with these? I would think a lively minnow would pull the line out of the contacts.
    • My my, how the mighty have fallen...  I went back to the thread on the cook subsidy, and what did I find in the second post from you, on the second page....     Gee, you were ok with the 66 million because it wasn't a stadium or something, but now all butt hurt over 7 million of Indiana money?    Now that there is a funny joke.  
    • Thanks to everyone who replied. Lots of good advice. I'll start with an electrician and go from there.
    • Is there some type of frame or carriage that bolt to machine?  Or do the extra wheels just "float" back there?
    • Who has it for that price? Is the transducer included? I have a 5" version. They are good units but if you ever need out of warranty service they will not repair your unit. They give you credit towards a refurbished unit of the same type or let you upgrade to a different model for a certain price which is something to be aware of. I found that out when my elite 5 wouldn't turn on.
    • Your post is demonstrative of the point I am trying to make. Rural areas have been sold a bunch of talk, and you believe that talk and vote against your own interests. The metro area is taking nothing away from the rural areas in terms of taxes, tax dollars flow the other way. It flows that way through employers that exploit you. A particular quote from "What's the Matter with Kansas?" really nails the point home.      
  • Our Sponsors