Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Chode2235

Nets - Coated Nylon or Rubber Mesh?

14 posts in this topic

Looking for a new fishing net, and was wondering the opinions on coated nylon or rubber mesh.

I do mostly C&R for bass, walleyes, and tangle with the occasional pike or musky. I want something big enough to handle those big fish, but not something huge that will take up my whole boat.

I also want something that wont tangle my hooks and will be as easy as possible on my catch for release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

coated nylon! them rubber ones dont hold fish very well IMO get a tangle free net and you will be happy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the coated nylon as well although I've never actually tried a rubber mesh. There are those that claim the rubber mesh is safer for the fish. I don't know about that and I believe it can have a lot to do with how you handle the net and how you handle the fish.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had both and like the rubber coated nylon much better than the solid rubber nets. The solid rubber nets are very heavy so it is difficult to one-arm net a fish if your solo. Rubber nets are also very shallow so it's easier for a fish to bounce or jump out. The advantage is that they are very tangle free and almost impossible to tangle with trebble hooks, so the only time I would recommend one is if you do a ton of trolling cranks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The newer bigger rubber nets are deeper. But they are heavier and tougher to handle if you're fishing alone. They do handle large fish pretty well. I keep a big nylon net in the boat just in case I hook up with a big musky though. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not buy a rubber net again. They're heavy and I've had fish bounce out of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a pretty big fan of rubber nets. I don't own one, but the two time's I've used one, I've thought to myself "why don't I have one of these? I like using this better than my current net"

Then I go and look at the prices, and realize why I don't have one. In my experience, they're considerably more expensive than other nets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We use the rubber nets for bass and walleye, but The guides also carry larger nets just in case they run into a large pike or muskie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a rubber net for eyes and it works great. Yes, a larger fish can bounce out of it if you are not careful but heck, I never catch fish that big.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Stowaway, love that thing.. Its got a coated net.. and then the whole thing folds up to fit in storage easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will never own another rubber net. I hated how heavy they are and how fish can actually trampoline their way out of it. Get a good coated net. There are many nice nets but my next one will be a Stowmaster. Big $ but worth it to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   Well, like I said, I think it was fake news but it was still pretty darn good! I like a really tomatoey chili and this one was that.
    •   I like chili without beans but my wife likes them and this recipe called for beans so I went with it.   That's pretty close to what I just made but it looks darn good. I'll probably try this one next time!
    •   This has zero to do with the article I posted. I don't think you get it.   Another one that doesn't get it.
    •     So you're saying that statement isn't true?      
    •   Oh, I see now.   The Feds bowing out completely,  zero control, regulation and placing it in the hands of the citizens, effectively ending the war, will flip the script and it will correct itself.    Crime down, prisons emptied, addiction to new lows, family saved.   Stfu.   You have no idea or plans to swap in after decriminalizing. None. Nothing.        
    •     Do you have any evidence to back this statement up?   Because if you listen to Trump's rhetoric, the focus is clearly on illegal drugs coming across the border.  With a traditional militaristic approach.
    •     The double standard pertains more to whether you have the financial resources to go into treatment and avoid going to prison than to legal versus illegal.  If Rush didn't have the financial resources to hire a good lawyer, he would have gone to prison rather than to a treatment center - simple as that.  The federal government (via the taxpayers) funds prisons - they do not fund treatment centers.   Both are controlled substances, but the reality is the government doesn't do a very good job of controlling either one.  They are still dragging their feet on legalizing or even re-classifying marijuana, even though it is common knowledge their classification is a complete farce.   The legal opiate version is just as addicting, or possibly more addicting than the illegal version, and accounts for the largest percentage of drug overdose deaths today.   If there is a crackdown on prescription opioids, the data shows there will be an increase in illegal heroin use.  Florida is a prime example.   We know there are ways of treating addiction that do not involve prison sentences.     The War on Drugs going at it from the traditional/conventional federal perspective is a complete failure.   Those are the facts, but obviously none of that makes any difference to you, and you will continue to defend the status quo with no rational reason to do so.     Bobby nailed it when he said "syntax error on line 1"....              
    • And KIDNEY BEANS? HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!
  • Our Sponsors