Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Peterson Indicted for Child Abuse


LMITOUT

Recommended Posts

What are u smoking? The vikings did not do anything,

Yeah, the Vikings had nothing to do with it.

When sponsors starting pulling their funds, the commissioner stepped in and suspended Peterson to protect the team.

Yeah, that's what happened.

crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 541
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

a d he is far from a dirt bag, just an kver anxious misguided father.

I'd say fathering half a dozen kids with different mothers, along with beating the hell out of the kids when he does see them, basically qualifies him as a dirtbag. But he sure was a good football player a couple years ago.

Still standing by my prediction. Superbowl, here we come. Starting with a fresh AP 'beating' up on the Bears in a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep smoking.....

Sponsors like budweiser (aka alchoholism) & nike(aka child labor) were definitely putting the heat on Goodell (aka NFL) but in no way was tbere a "save the vikings" mentality from new york, it was more like " save the NFL's a$$".

Keep huffing...

Regardless, he still hasn't "done any time" and the NFL still has their domestic abuse policy to fall back on to throw the book at him...and should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Goodell sent a letter to the NFL owners, which you can read in its entirely below, outlining the stiffer penalties: a six-game suspension without pay for the first offense and a lifetime ban for a second offense. Goodell specified that these rules will apply to all NFL personnel, including executives and owners, not just players. A player who receives a lifetime ban can petition for reinstatement after one year.

Quote:
Marijuana threshold: The NFL is ramping down it's stance on marijuana use. The threshold for a positive test has been increased from 15 ng/ml to 35 ng/ml.

Marijuana discipline: The punishment for a positive test is also changing. As is the case now, a first-time offense lands the player in the substance abuse program without a suspension. The primary difference is the punishment for a second positive test: simply a two-game fine. Each additional violation receives the following progressive discipline: four-game fine, four-game suspension, 10-game suspension. A player can therefore test positive for marijuana three times without getting suspended.

Keep huffing...

Regardless, he still hasn't "done any time" and the NFL still has their domestic abuse policy to fall back on to throw the book at him...and should.

If you look at the NFL's own policies it looks like Peterson has already served more than the prescribed suspension time. 6 weeks under the new domestic violence policy and nothing for 1st time marijuana offenders. By their own standards, the book has already been thrown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're assuming it's his first drug violation. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.

He hasn't served any suspension. He was put on "hiatus" until this was resolved. Perhaps the league will blend their blurry rules and consider this a suspension, but technically he hasn't been suspended and did receive pay. I've heard he paid "some" back. What "some" means is unknown but it is obviously an effort to smooth this over in an attempt to persuade the league to consider it time served.

Regardless, the Vikings should do the right thing and bench him for the remainder of the year and then cut him afterwards. He's due way too much money next year and isn't worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will play again this year, will do a big public service apology and mea culpa, the Vikes and Peterson will restructure in the off-season, both will give a big donation to local domestic violence chartites, and all will be hunky dorey. Its time for the spin doctors to do their magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B-S he ain't worth it. He's got PLENTY left in the tank, especially being he hasn't played in like 8 weeks. As it sits there is more talent in an AP fart then what's in the backfield right now. My guess is he's a 15 minute apology/new AP presser away from re gaining LMITs acceptance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B-S he ain't worth it. He's got PLENTY left in the tank, especially being he hasn't played in like 8 weeks. As it sits there is more talent in an AP fart then what's in the backfield right now. My guess is he's a 15 minute apology/new AP presser away from re gaining LMITs acceptance.

He might have plenty left in the tank but he's due to be paidd like 75% more than any other running back in the league in 2015 (including his salary which is 25% more than any other in the league plus prorated signing bonus). The fact is he's NOT worth 75% more than any of the other top backs in the league, even before this debacle.

Had this whole thing not have happened, the vikes might have ended up eating his contract, similar to how the twins got stuck with Mauer due to how many fans around here seemed to like him. Fan backlash would have been pretty high if they released him. At best, they could have restructured it slightly, but would still be overpaying an aging back. Now, they have their get out of jail free card and can let him go with a minimal cap hit next year.

But first, they will win the superbowl with him this year after he's reinstated next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're assuming it's his first drug violation. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.

He hasn't served any suspension. He was put on "hiatus" until this was resolved. Perhaps the league will blend their blurry rules and consider this a suspension, but technically he hasn't been suspended and did receive pay. I've heard he paid "some" back. What "some" means is unknown but it is obviously an effort to smooth this over in an attempt to persuade the league to consider it time served.

Regardless, the Vikings should do the right thing and bench him for the remainder of the year and then cut him afterwards. He's due way too much money next year and isn't worth it.

You are the one assuming everything. He had a perfectly clean record till now. There is not a single business in this world that just dumps their best/most talented/most productive employee for nothing. He will finish the season playing on the field for the vikings (unless nfl drags feet bigtime or injured) since he cannot be traded anymore this season and will c how the chips fall in off season. He is a phenomenal asset to the community even with this mark on his record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B-S he ain't worth it. He's got PLENTY left in the tank, especially being he hasn't played in like 8 weeks. As it sits there is more talent in an AP fart then what's in the backfield right now. My guess is he's a 15 minute apology/new AP presser away from re gaining LMITs acceptance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might have plenty left in the tank but he's due to be paidd like 75% more than any other running back in the league in 2015 (including his salary which is 25% more than any other in the league plus prorated signing bonus). The fact is he's NOT worth 75% more than any of the other top backs in the league, even before this debacle.

Had this whole thing not have happened, the vikes might have ended up eating his contract, similar to how the twins got stuck with Mauer due to how many fans around here seemed to like him. Fan backlash would have been pretty high if they released him. At best, they could have restructured it slightly, but would still be overpaying an aging back. Now, they have their get out of jail free card and can let him go with a minimal cap hit next year.

But first, they will win the superbowl with him this year after he's reinstated next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might have plenty left in the tank but he's due to be paidd like 75% more than any other running back in the league in 2015 (including his salary which is 25% more than any other in the league plus prorated signing bonus). The fact is he's NOT worth 75% more than any of the other top backs in the league, even before this debacle.

I'll bet over the years you've thought he is one of the best RBs ever. He's got at least 4 more SOLID years left in him. One of the best ever, sure bet player for 3-5 yrs is going to get paid. You don't have to agree with it, but it is fact. Don't be a hypocrite. You love AP and know he's well worth the money, regardless where it comes from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love AP as a player but there is no way in HEll that I would pay in that kind of money anymore. And its not just because of what happened this summer. Too much money. I could only wish Major would have switched his kid to have an out of that contract.

Too much money. The vikes will be better without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love AP as a player but there is no way in HEll that I would pay in that kind of money anymore. And its not just because of what happened this summer. Too much money. I could only wish Major would have switched his kid to have an out of that contract.

Too much money. The vikes will be better without him.

My sentiments exactly. I love the player, but I don't condone teams crippling themselves in contracts just because I love the player.

Prior to this season I was telling friends the same story -- that the vikes were in a sad situation because they were going to be overpaying an aging running back for the foreseeable future, because they wouldn't be able to get away from that contract without making the fans rabid. Now they don't have that issue, and they will be better without his contract dragging them down.

I'm not saying he's not a great running back, just that at that price he wasn't worth it. Could get a good back AND something else for that kind of dough. I don't know why DrJuice is calling me a hypocrite because I'm happy they won't have to pay out the final years of that overpriced contract.

That being said, I'm not trying to run the guy out of town just because of his newly-publicized-dirt-baggery. I would say that if they vikes could restructure the contract for a much lower dollar amount (one in line with his diminishing skillz and with understanding that his tainted image isn't going to sell as many tickets or jerseys), I'd be happy to see him stay. But that won't happen.

Vick didn't stay in Atlanta after his stint in the big house, and I don't expect Peterson to stick around here. Fresh start is probably better for him in the longrun anyway. I'll be sad to see the player leave -- but happy with the dollars that we can spent elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are the one assuming everything. He had a perfectly clean record till now. There is not a single business in this world that just dumps their best/most talented/most productive employee for nothing. He will finish the season playing on the field for the vikings (unless nfl drags feet bigtime or injured) since he cannot be traded anymore this season and will c how the chips fall in off season. He is a phenomenal asset to the community even with this mark on his record.

5 kids with 4 different mothers, what an asset to the community. He's a real model for our youth. Yeah, rumor has it he's supporting all of them, but what will happen when he blows out a knee permanently? Then the money stops and we get to support his kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.