Born2Fish Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 Just watched the live press conference that said in 3 years the Vikings WILL have a new stadium in Arden Hills. So much for all that "Vikings moving to LA" talk. I would like to be the first to say, SKOL VIKINGS!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PierBridge Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 Sounds to good to be true! And thanks for posting it in here versus silltown so when can enjoy this for a bit! +1 on SKOAL VIKES! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 What, is the money tree finally in bloom?LOL!Five billion dollar deficit and we're building stadiums for billionaires... Only in Minnesota. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianLucky13 Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 Get rid of em!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 isnt there a Packer thread you 2 can stink up somewhere?We all know it was going to get built sooner or later. The Vikes werent going to leave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Then why aren't the Vikings/Wilfs paying more than ~45% of the costs if we knew they weren't going to leave? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 isnt there a Packer thread you 2 can stink up somewhere? Super Bowl champion threads don't stink by definition. Vikings threads, on the other hand . . . . Hey, you were the one who injected the Packers. What were you thinking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Then why aren't the Vikings/Wilfs paying more than ~45% of the costs if we knew they weren't going to leave? I have always thought the city/county/state should be accountable for the roof, and the roads to the place, along with a percentage of the building costs, since the city/state/county will also be using it for things other then football. What perentage? I dont know, thats for them to decide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurpleFloyd Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 I can understand building the roads and paying for the cost of running the utilities to the facility but if a business cannot afford to pay for their own building then they shouldn't be in business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 But wont they be using the building for other things then football? Isnt that why they want a roof on it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Get it done by any means possible. It's good for the state and the people who live here.Still has to pass the legislature which is not a gimme...although we FINALLY have a governor who isn't afraid to take a stand on getting this done. T-Paw was a spineless punk who refused to take a position on this and instead chose to pass the buck...nothing out of the ordinary for him though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 That's a new way of saying that he took the responsible route instead of placing the burden on the backs of MN taxpayers... And for your information, the stadium idea never made it out of the DFL controlled legislature year after year because even they saw the $5B writing on the wall. It never made it to T-Paw's desk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwmiller33 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Then why aren't the Vikings/Wilfs paying more than ~45% of the costs if we knew they weren't going to leave? 45% is a lot more than owners/franchises normally throw down for a new stadiumOther football stadium examples; Steelers 78% public funded, Broncos 70% public funded, Texans 73% public funded, Cleveland Browns Stadium 75% public funded, Arizona Cardinals 68% public funded, Indianapolis Colts 86% public funded.Twins payed 1/3 of the cost of Target Field. Bottom line, Vikings wanted to stay here, otherwise they wouldn't have thrown down so much of their own $ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 That doesn't make it right, and if people don't start calling their bluff it won't stop. Those are the spineless ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwmiller33 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 How exactly do you expect to make it stop? If one city isn't willing to pony up, the franchise can find another city that will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Jake, you are arguing with a packer fan, you wont win! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 If one city isn't willing to pony up, the franchise can find another city that will. Good riddance.Says a lot about the "home town team" if they are that willing to pull up stakes and move out of town (take their ball and go home), doesn't it? How can a fan have any faith in a team that would rather stab them in the back than do the right thing...if they really mean it, that is. They sure love the fan loyalty when the going is good, but don't seem to want to return the favor when they are asked to "pony up" to build their own facility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bottom-bouncer Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 AS much as it hurts limit is spot on in are current financial situation why is this even being talked about. One of the dumbest things this state has done. whats the current unemployment rate at 7% or so how much money has been taken away from education. Whats the current foreclosure rate at. And yet we will build 900,000 million dollar stadium. Unreall!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 While I do agree, now is not the best time, but, sometime has to be, and its getting to the now or never point. Or scat, or get off the pot. If they hire a MN company to build it, it will add some jobs, and the cost to build one, will only go up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 That's a new way of saying that he took the responsible route instead of placing the burden on the backs of MN taxpayers... And for your information, the stadium idea never made it out of the DFL controlled legislature year after year because even they saw the $5B writing on the wall. It never made it to T-Paw's desk. I just saw the interview last week where he clearly said he did not want to deal with the stadium...doesn't matter if it ever reached his desk or not. Dayton is pushing this thing right now...not running from it. To say T-Paw took the responsible route on this issue may be the most preposterous statement you've ever made on this forum...and that's saying something. He ran from this issue with knees and elbows flying! Spineless in that he took no stance either way. Clearly, everyhting he's done in the last 4 years is to cover his a$$ and take the "out" route on anything that could come back to haunt him in his run for the presidency. Good luck with that T-Puke!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PierBridge Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 I have no problem with anybody being against a publicly funded stadium......that being said I hope they don't compromise and try to save money by eliminating the retractable roof and going with a fixed roof-top.Also I highly doubt it's going to pass the house and Senate nor do I believe MPLS is out of the running either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skolvikesallday Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 What, is the money tree finally in bloom?LOL!Five billion dollar deficit and we're building stadiums for billionaires... Only in Minnesota. Yea only in Minnesota... and every single other state in the country. Face it, this is the only way stadiums get built. Or would you prefer we be the one state with no pro sports teams whatsoever?SKOL VIKES!!!Can't wait to see a game there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwmiller33 Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Or would you prefer we be the one state with no pro sports teams whatsoever?the day Minnesota turns into Iowa, or the third Dakota, will be a sad day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paceman Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 Yes there will ne an initial cost to the state to build it. But in the long run it should also benefit the state. The stadium will employ a lot of folks, the local hotels, bars, resturants, shopping centers,.... will benefit. All these fine folks will be paying taxes on thier purchases. I think it is a good investment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. Amish Posted May 11, 2011 Share Posted May 11, 2011 i wonder if they'll redesign their uniforms to have a third viking horn protruding from their abdomen or something. maybe a third eye on the viking symbol? the site is on the superfund list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.