koonie Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Originally Posted By: koonie Go home Pack! How's that? Yawn. At least LMIT knows how to put up an INTERESTING trolling run. What? You want a chart now? Nah. I'm not a troll. It's just too easy with sports fans. Plus. It's "generally" just idiots being idiots for the sake of being idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 What? You want a chart now? Nah, I never needed the chart in the first place. LMIT just put it up to puzzle the mouth breathers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 The Vikes have enjoyed a good season no matter where they finish. My guess is that they will go farther than the Packers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Dave2 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I missed the part where anyone said the Vikes are the worst 12-4 team in football history. quote] Let's ask LMIT what he thinks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Dave2 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Originally Posted By: Big Dave2 But, you were wrong that it would cost the vikings 5 more losses. Funny, there is an entire thread dedicated to his fumbling problems. Oh wait, now that they're in the playoffs that doesn't matter and we'll just go on our merry little way. It doesn't matter. I proved that in the other thread using sound statistical evidence that no one has been able to dispute. Last I checked the Vikings had two+ more wins then they should have due to the luck factor (that chart thingy that you didn't quite understand), so subtract that out and we're really looking at a 9-7 team. Last I checked the Vikings have two more losses then they should have due to other teams "luck factor". So add those on and we are looking at a 14-2 team. But, how does one predict luck? I guess I should have factored that in to my 7-9 guess. Last year I would have been right on had I factored in the Vikings' luck factor. I never learn.... I don't know anything about all of this. Your the one with the chart. I'm not the one who believes in luck, or the tooth fairy, or easter bunny............................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Originally Posted By: LMITOUTJust like last year the Vikes got a cupcake game to fall into the playoffs, and in this case, a first round bye (after Philly lost of course). Backed in? Maybe not exactly, but You should pay better attention. This team had a division championship, and a playoff spot, wrapped up a couple of weeks ago. I never said they didn't. I probably should have used a different word than "fall", as I was meaning their transition into the playoffs, but considering their performance over the last four games they very well could be considered as falling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Originally Posted By: LMITOUT Last I checked the Vikings had two+ more wins then they should have due to the luck factor (that chart thingy that you didn't quite understand), so subtract that out and we're really looking at a 9-7 team. Last I checked the Vikings have two more losses then they should have due to other teams "luck factor". So add those on and we are looking at a 14-2 team. But, how does one predict luck? I guess I should have factored that in to my 7-9 guess. Last year I would have been right on had I factored in the Vikings' luck factor. I never learn.... I don't know anything about all of this. Your the one with the chart. I'm not the one who believes in luck, or the tooth fairy, or easter bunny............................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Dave2 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Does anyone else ever get the feeling that LMITOUT and Steve Foss are the same person? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Does anyone else ever get the feeling that LMITOUT and Steve Foss are the same person? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Uran Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 dun dun DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN!!!!!!The plot thickens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 SOMETHING'S getting a little thick in here, and it rhymes with "wit." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrtardy99 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Vikes do not need "Luck" to be the Pack, they have Jared Allen for that. Poor A. Rogers has horrible nightmares at the thought of facing him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishersofmen Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 You mean how he starts to wet down his leg everytime he sees the hillbilly on the other side of the ball........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave S Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Does anyone else ever get the feeling that LMITOUT and Steve Foss are the same person? LOL, Good one Dave. Trust me they're not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Uran Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 You mean how he starts to wet down his leg everytime he sees the hillbilly on the other side of the ball........ Rodgers does have 50 sacks and 10 fumbles on the year... how many were from that Hillbilly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Dave2 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 It was interesting listening to the announcers during the game commenting on the Giants and that they most likely have their tee times made and vacation bags packed when they get back home. The Giants players didn't give a rip about that game. 44-7? Big deal. They were merely going through the motions and the clock couldn't run out fast enough so they could get started with their off season plans. Just like last year the Vikes got a cupcake game to fall into the playoffs, and in this case, a first round bye (after Philly lost of course). Backed in? Maybe not exactly, but they really didn't have to put up much of an effort to win that last game against a bunch of players thinking of warmer places and were fortunate that NYG didn't have anything to play for. Anybody who thinks that this past game was some sort of statement is kidding themselves. What exactly was Carolina and Buffalo playing for when they beat Indy and NOrleans? I would think these teams would have had thier tee times set and vacation bags packed as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Dave2 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Originally Posted By: Big Dave2 Does anyone else ever get the feeling that LMITOUT and Steve Foss are the same person? LOL, Good one Dave. Trust me they're not. I'm not sure who to trust anymore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I'm not sure who to trust anymore Trust NO ONE! Especially on the sports or Silly Town forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 What exactly was Carolina and Buffalo playing for when they beat Indy and NOrleans? I could only guess they were playing for pride, obviously something the Giants didn't care about by the way they mailed it in last week after missing out on the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we are 'the leading edge' HSO Creators Rick Posted January 5, 2010 we are 'the leading edge' HSO Creators Share Posted January 5, 2010 I believe the Vikes forced them to mail it in.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyehunter Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Originally Posted By: fishersofmen You mean how he starts to wet down his leg everytime he sees the hillbilly on the other side of the ball........ Rodgers does have 50 sacks and 10 fumbles on the year... how many were from that Hillbilly? I think you can credit that hillbilly with about 9 of those 50 sacks there leechbait.....for those of you that don't own a calculator or are hillbillies yourselves, that's 18% of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Does anyone else ever get the feeling that LMITOUT and Steve Foss are the same person? I've already accused LMIT of being Dan Barrierro (sp)...he may be Foss too. LMIT's a double agent either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.