Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Neiko

Private Acces Legal or Illegal

Recommended Posts

I don't have a problem paying to get on a lake but what is the legality of it? Can they only charge for you to go across there land or can they charge either per person in the vehicle or say we have 3 portables in 1 vehicle. Can they legally charge you access fee times 3? I know they do a great job taken care of the roads and making it safe but are they gouging us if they do it that way. I hope no resort owner takes this the wrong way. I appreciate everything they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it should be one vehicle one charge...and yes what they are tech. charging you for is to cross their property as when you get on the lake you have as much of a right to be there as anyone else......now of course it is up to the outfit to what and how they charge but I have never seen anything beyond one vehicle one charge........it is also in your best intrest not to tick off the outfit as if you pay to cross their land they should be the ones to help if you need it on the ice...i.e a pull to get out of a snowbank, a jump start if your engine goes dead, ect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have only seen them charge by vehicle also. And I am always happy to pay it because of the hard work they put into keeping the roads plowed and access open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can charge whatever they like if you want to cross their land to get there. If they are the only outfit on a lake and no public access than you are at their mercy.

I do agree that being nice is in your favor as far as getting assistance and getting around on the lake, but I get a little upset when people start claiming "roads" on the ice and think they can charge for the roads. I realize that they put time and effort into making those roads, but they are on the lake and that makes them public.

I would be wary of leaving a perm shack near a road that you didn't pay to access because plow drivers have been known to plow in shacks that are near their roads. It is wrong, but I don't think there is any kind of law against it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't plan on getting in a [PoorWordUsage] match with them I just thought they could only charge you to cross the land not by how many portables out there. We will only be bringing 1 portable. Would a lot of people still pay to get on Red or Mille lacs if they charged $10 per head all of a sudden instead of per vehicle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neiko, Technically, They can charge ANYTHING they want. I had a guy tell me that he was charging $90/head to get onto Swan Lake for duck hunting. It's what it's worth to you. How badly do you want to hunt/fish that body of water and what are you willing to spend? You ARE crossing his property and the state will not intervein, It's between you and him. I did end up hunting RIGHT in front of that guys place, not A THING he could do about it. I just had to work harder and longer, but we saved the $90/per. I went to a neighbor of his, talked nice, (a little shineola) and asked permission nicely, I still have access to that water. I just love it when I can wave and say "Hi" to the $90 guy, I bet that just eats his craw!!! BTW, If a county road comes close to the waters edge, there is also 'right-of-way'. Sometimes that can put you on the water legally. Phred52

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your on a small lake with no other access points, then your at their mercy.

However on the larger lakes like Red and Mille Lacs and others, the law of economics will take its course. The higher prices person will eventually have to lower the rates or risk losing business. Unless the other owners on the lake consequentially raise prices to match the first guy. Eventually everyone would buy season passes or find a different lake and then prices would come down again.

I dont think they should charge by the head, because they are providing a plowed road to drive on. So only charge by the vehichle...if prices warrant, then just raise that single price accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would it be illegal? The owner of real property has the right to charge whatever is deemed appropriate in our capitalist society. I sure as [mod edit] don't want the gubmint legislating private ramp fees. Sheesh....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't worry about it. Plowed roads are nice to have and the resort will look out for you. If you have an emergency and you went out through the resort, most will come and help you out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem paying for access but it is when they want to charge per head that I think they are fleecing us. I know I don't have to pay it but what if you got to Red and found out this is how they were doing it? You would be [PoorWordUsage]. Sorry if I wasted someones time because they read this thread. You will never get the time back so move on. Thanks for people who responded to it. I will hopefully get to try out this lake and see if it is worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as a guy that plows roads think of this, after the average snowfall on Upper Red the plows will burn up to $800 in fuel alone in one afternoon thats just one company. Lets not forget wear and tear, insurance etc etc.

Another way to look at it is on Upper Red if the road operators did not plow the first 100 yards of Upper Red is often three feet deep or more with snow. No vehicles or wheeler strictly sleds. So now you need a sled and portable to drag three, five or even nine miles across the lake and back.

What if you have trouble? Say you break down, forget your lights on, get stuck or even drop tires in a crack or pressure ridge, No road operators no rescue teams such as myself that go out just about every other night at 2am for this kind of stuff.

Always amazes me; $40,000 truck, $15,000 wheel house, $5,000 in ice gear $200 boots, $100 in beer and $20 bucks in McDonalds wrappers but the road fee is outrageous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the point I was making Jonny. Thanks for pointing out all the costs. It costs the resort owners plenty of time and money to keep it up so we can enjoy the sport. Not only do I love the roads but the piece of mind that if I get stuck or in trouble they will come and help us out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always amazes me; $40,000 truck, $15,000 wheel house, $5,000 in ice gear $200 boots, $100 in beer and $20 bucks in McDonalds wrappers but the road fee is outrageous.

Well said smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This belongs in the Discussions/Clean-up Forum. If you don't like access fees and the priveledge of traveling on makrked and plowed roads, use the public access.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about this and just remembered I paid almost 80 bucks in parking for the ice show, places I went for dinner/drinks after the ice show etc etc. Now that really is the same deal. I am paying to utilize somebody’s’ space or property. Sure it has a parking ramp on it or a asphalt lot with a gate but it is simple and easy so I pay the 10 bucks to park my truck. I could drive around for forty-five minutes and look for a place to park but I would rather just pay the ten bucks and get on with life if I can afford to eat at a restaurant I can afford to park.

I guess I never questioned the legality of it just figure why look a gift horse in the mouth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always amazes me; $40,000 truck, $15,000 wheel house, $5,000 in ice gear $200 boots, $100 in beer and $20 bucks in McDonalds wrappers but the road fee is outrageous.

Don't try to bring logic and reasoning into the discussion. wink

I believe people who want to be mad about the road fee justify it by thiking "they can't charge me to use the public lake." Yes that's true but they can charge you to drive across their land, which of course goes along with driving on the roads that are nicely plowed.

If you have an issue with it no one is forcing you to pay the money. You can buy your own land and plow truck and make your own road, or buy a snowmobile and go out of the public access.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, If a county road comes close to the waters edge, there is also 'right-of-way'. Sometimes that can put you on the water legally. Phred52

This is true, but needs some more info, in case anyone tries this: The surface of the water is public - the land leading up to the water is is the issue here. The public easement for any public road (township, county, state, federal) extends beyond the road edge. If the water body water surface crosses over the easement boundary, your body can cross 100% public land (and no private land) right up to the water surface edge. You can then legally access the body of water at the point where this occurs. You can't "jump" over exposed private land to get to the water - that is trespassing. While the water level is too low to overlap the easement boundary, you may not access the body of water at that location.

Pretty simple. Get as technical as you like about it, but the spirit of the law in Mn is simple. You can get easement information from the government entity that *maintains* the road (not "funds" the road - sometimes they are different).

Now - I *DO* know of at least one lake where the actual LAND UNDER THE LAKE is deeded private, and always has been legally recorded that way. This is an exception. That means that unlike the above scenario, where I can also wade in from the easement - in this one case, I cannot! Since I'd be on private property! Weird, huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scott, It was one of the landowners on 'Sunday Bay'. Gotta be 18 maybe 20 years ago now. Made an impression on me that has lasted. Phred52

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could always just go use the public ramp. Without getting into an ethics discussion:

Gaining access to a lake via private property is a private matter. The owner is and should be free to charge whatever he wishes. Those of us that wish to use the access must decide if we're willing to pay the price for the access and any other services that might be included with the fee. That's called free enterprise. We the buyer can only get hosed if we give it up.

While I understand the thought, I do have some issue with the idea that because someone plows a road on public land/water, they somehow own that road. Yes, they have some expense and they put in the time.

Where I have trouble with it is when they did it on their own accord and then get all bent out of shape because someone uses it without crossing the seller's private land to get on. Build a road on a public lake and it will be used, sorry. Just like the buyer must decide if the price is right, the seller too must decide if if the work is worth it.

It would be like me taking my snowblower to my neighbors, cleaning out his driveway, and then sending him a bill even though he didn't hire me to do it.

If I build a deer stand or blind on public land and another hunter comes along and uses it, who am I to expect him to contribute to my costs? Tough bounce. I can use a portable if it's such an issue.

If I buy 20,000 gallons of gasoline at $1.50 per gallon I should have the right to sell it for $10.00 per gallon if I can get it.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with BOB.

I won't ever knock the work that good resort operators like the Petrowskis put into their livelihood.

If you have the nicest roads, a nice access and maybe parking available for those with sled/wheeler trailers than people will pay the fee. You are providing a service.

The problem I have is that once a road is made on public waters, some resort owners feel an entitlement to that road (for good reason) for the reasons Johnny listed.

When I was on URL 2 yrs ago (before you could keep walleyes) I was issued a "road pass" by my resort and I had to pay per day even if I didn't leave the lake and I had to show the pass.

Roads on ice are public and resort owners shouldn't be mad or "protect" their roads if people use them and they didn't access those roads from the private access. It's the price of doing business. If they don't want outside travelers, they shouldn't plow such nice roads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • If i'm not mistaken i believe the older 5 and the new chirp use different transducers.  Assuming you are looking at purchasing the ice transducer.  In my opinion the Humminbird page is horrible.  They do not explain things very well in their descriptions.  Just an FYI that the ice pack they offer with the XL-9-20 transducer does come with the power adapter to hook to the battery but does not include the battery and charger.
    • I too am planning on rigging a Helix for the ice.  I have both an older generation 5 and and a gen 2 Helix 7 chirp.  So I would like to know if the gen 2 7 would be that much more advanced for using on the ice than the first gen 5 or would the 5 do the same job for me?  I am also trying to decide if I should but a carrier for it or make something.
    •  thinkin this over i post an ocassional pic of smoked, fried, or pickled fish and the TIP line gets posted..................... not posting no more pics!!!!!!!!!
    • Not sure if this will help...... https://www.sbnation.com/2017/9/7/16171262/nfl-without-cable-tv-cord-cutting-streaming-online-how-to-watch
    •  We might have gotten enough cold before snow to freeze the bogs too.
    •    Used to be you had to plug in your car or you weren't going anywhere.  Frost plug heaters vary from 400-1000 watts or think of 4-10 100 watt incandescent light bulbs left on 24-7.  I wouldn't be able to sleep at night.    Its money wasted and using resources we should be cutting back on. As far as damaging anything, you'll burn out the heater sooner and are a pain to replace.   Can't prove it but I think your creating an environment internally and externally for condensation to the engine.  There is a benefit to the engine having been warmed but frost plug heaters really aren't intended to be plugged in 24-7, a couple hours is all you need.   Its not likely your going to wake up 2 hours early and go outside to plug in the car when its -30.   If you had a set schedule you could put the heater on a timer to turn on an hour or two and use the remote start 5 minutes before you leave.   Otherwise plug it in at night before you go to bed.
    • Does anyone have any good tips on streaming both ESPN and NFL Network? I can get ESPN on Hulu Live ($44/mo) but it doesn't look like they have NFLN. On Sling, ESPN is on Orange but NFLN is on Blue so I would need to get both which would be $40/mo. On Playstation Vue I can get both with their Core plan ($45/mo). Although I haven't tried, I'm guessing that I can't get this through our Xboxes, which is what we use on 3 of our TV's, so if I went this route I would need to buy some additional Roku's (what we use on our other TV's). Directv Now (their no satellite streaming service) ($35/mo) has ESPN but doesn't appear to have NFLN.  
    • No doubt, it rarely works out like Staal. Koivu was extended for a little too much but he just has a great year and is still super valuable to this team. We just have no one to replace him, trading for a high end center is just about impossible without giving up way too much or taking a big risk on a player. Ideally he will be our 3rd line center as he ages so I'm not worried about him on the team, we just need Ek to step up at some point in the next year or three and become a 50 point center or better.

      Lucky to get two points last night, we had no business getting the win but I will take anything we can get. 
    • I have been contemplating it but haven't yet. The cost has been holding me back. I currently have Hulu's no commercial plan for $11.99 and if I went live I would want the no commercials live plan which is $43.99. Then if you want more than 50 hours of DVR (and the ability to fast forward through commercials) it is an additional $14.99. More than 2 screens at a time is also an additional $14.99. (You can get both for $20/mo).  If you are not an existing customer you can try it for 7 days free. Unfortunately I can't since I am an existing customer (which led to a lively discussion with one of their customer service reps). 
  • Our Sponsors