Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Gordie

rumor has it

42 posts in this topic

that there was a 66lb flat caught in the minn river, well Ill just say south of Jordan a friend of mines brother saw the fish but really didnt get any details as call was dropped and havent been able to contact him yet, I will see him tommarrow and will see what or if any more details on it.

just wondering if anyone heard anything?

AND no I'm not trying to start something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ive head of bigger come out of the minnesota by redwood falls but never saw it so who knows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would sure love to believe all these reports and photos of "possible state record" fish and 60 pounders but I'm still calling [PoorWordUsage] on most of them.

This weeks Outdoor News has a reported 60 pounder on the front cover. No offense to the fisherman but please.

A true, honest 50lb fish is a HUGE fish, I mean HUGE fish. A fish pushing 60lb is a flipping monster around these parts. I know of 2 fish in the upper 50 range that were caught by folks that I would trust my life to and they are big fish, and its dead obvious in the photos.

Here's my reasoning:

1) Not many fisherman have scales that read past 50lbs. So the fish bottomed out a 50lb scale... NICE FISH but that doesn't make it 60lb.

2) Darren's length/girth formula gets into uncharted water with the big fish. Data was based off of many, many, many 20 to mid 40lb fish but not a lot of 50lb plusers made it into the average for obvious reasons, there just aren't a lot caught.

3) Actual method of measurement in itself. You laying a fish on a steel ruler or pulling a flexible tape across it for length? One will obviously read more than another. Same for girth, soft flexible tape or steel tape? One's gonna give you more girth than the other. Just saying measurements can be manipulated a bit in the process and the tools used. How honest are you? Right on the nuts are letting it slip a bit.

Just saying that if you are going to put your face in print with "possible state record" or "60lb plus" flathead next to it with a weight based off a conversion formula, I hope you can take the heat.

I'm off my soapbox, let me have it. wink

PS... this is coming from a guy who just fished a walleye tourney with an 18-26" protected slot limit. Over 3 days, we measured probably a dozen walleyes within a 1/16" of that 26" mark. If we're recreational fishing, heck yeah... thats a 26" walleye. But when a CO is measuring your fish before you go on stage to weigh, you want NO MISTAKE in that fish making it over the 26" mark. Many fish were let go near that 26" mark because we were honest with ourselves and our measuring ability. There was no room for "close". And I'm not talking an inch or two close, I'm taking a 1/64" close. Tough to do, very tough to do with thousands of dollars on the line but you have to be right or your getting DQ'd and a ticket on top of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elwood knows all. I have even got down wind of this rumor. If true nice fish.

Yep Chris I do agree. I know anyone can get lucky and I am sure there are some major cat guys out their that are not on the forms but let's face it most are. You cruise any stretch of either rivers at 2:00am and if you see another cat guy the chances are good you will know him or know of him/her. Looking back in this forum with all the time put forth and knowledge of flats, no one has broken the 60 mark. Not saying it could not happen and it maybe has to some lurkers, but if it does not have a stamp on it from the some of the people I know, there will always be a “?” Mark on it. IMO. Unless the DNR says other wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PS... this is coming from a guy who just fished a walleye tourney with an 18-26" protected slot limit. Over 3 days, we measured probably a dozen walleyes within a 1/16" of that 26" mark. If we're recreational fishing, heck yeah... thats a 26" walleye. But when a CO is measuring your fish before you go on stage to weigh, you want NO MISTAKE in that fish making it over the 26" mark. Many fish were let go near that 26" mark because we were honest with ourselves and our measuring ability. There was no room for "close". And I'm not talking an inch or two close, I'm taking a 1/64" close. Tough to do, very tough to do with thousands of dollars on the line but you have to be right or your getting DQ'd and a ticket on top of it.

Whats this walleye fish you are talking about?

Have you made it out on the river yet?

Get your motor figured out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats this walleye fish you are talking about?

Have you made it out on the river yet?

Get your motor figured out?

Walleye? Its a green fish with a white tip on its tail. Teeth. Good to eat.

River? No frown

Motor? No frown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im with you on that fish on the Outdoor News hanson. But still a nice fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im with you on that fish on the Outdoor News hanson. But still a nice fish.

Dang, I had a nice post typed up and hit the wrong key and pooof!

In short, its a very nice fish. No doubt... we know that. We also know it ain't 60lbs. Why sensationalize it? No offense to Outdoor News but if that paper cuts any more pages out of its issue, I'm cancelling. Its been whacked in half from 6 months ago. Times tough for print media?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: rushing

Whats this walleye fish you are talking about?

Have you made it out on the river yet?

Get your motor figured out?

Walleye? Its a green fish with a white tip on its tail. Teeth. Good to eat.

River? No frown

Motor? No frown

i have never seen a green walleye. does it glow too? if it does i probably wouldnt eat it. LOL laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows, maybe he did catch a huge on. If he did, congrats to him.

I don't like to say how large a fish is when I have not seen it in person. There have been a few times when I caught a fish and stated its size and others saw the picture and told me no way. Well, it was that big.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes Hanson you are correct on the formula for cats my cat last year was an impressive 48 3/4 x 31 and the formula for that is 56lbs and it was Dnr weighed at 47lbs on the nose the DNR also took the measurements of the fish. I'm not saying that it didnt happen for this fish of 66lbs but I just heard about it and now I have to get more details on the fish from my friend or his brother I would also like to see the pics of the fish also. and just wondering if anyone heard anything about it because a fish of that size I think would be talked about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that it didnt happen for this fish of 66lbs but I just heard about it and now I have to get more details on the fish from my friend or his brother I would also like to see the pics of the fish also. and just wondering if anyone heard anything about it because a fish of that size I think would be talked about

Yep... you mentioned rumor, I went off on another tangeant. But thats OK. I'm not specifically talking about this fish you heard about but these sudden 60 pounders in general. And you have to be living in a cave if you don't realize that there are more of these 60s than normal being discussed. Is that a fair question? I think it is.

Why is it all of a sudden that these "big fish" are popping up. Thats what I'd like to figure out. Is it a particular year class that hit its peak and people are catching them?? Is it because more people are on the river and fish are being caught that weren't caught before? Is it just the popularity, people are looking for a little ink? There was an article in the Strib about a muskie guide and a 50 pounder even not all that long ago.

I mean if a guy heard of a 60 plus pounder once a summer for years, I'd buy that. But those of us frequenting this forum know that isn't the case. We all know of fish in the 50lb neighborhood but anything over 55lbs is the talk on the street from Bloomington to New Ulm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yea I thought about it before I posted it and thought that there sure has been a lot of really,really big fish caught lately. The formula for the one caught in P3 doest even break the 60lb mark but it also shows by the inch no fractions involed. I think that the question you posed is a very fair ? why all of a sudden I think your best answer is people want the ink. and tangents arent always a bad thing, you are getting a very good point across the board. I'm just praying for an honest 50lb fish this year for myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just praying for an honest 50lb fish this year for myself.

I'm praying for an honest 50lb fish in my lifetime.

Dean Opatz mentioned the "50lb Club" at a BP Cat League meeting one year and I said I got a 48lb. He said, "That's still not a 50lb". Ouch! 2lbs away and you still aren't in. That's what I'm talking about if you know what I mean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: elwood
I'm not saying that it didnt happen for this fish of 66lbs but I just heard about it and now I have to get more details on the fish from my friend or his brother I would also like to see the pics of the fish also. and just wondering if anyone heard anything about it because a fish of that size I think would be talked about

Yep... you mentioned rumor, I went off on another tangeant. But thats OK. I'm not specifically talking about this fish you heard about but these sudden 60 pounders in general. And you have to be living in a cave if you don't realize that there are more of these 60s than normal being discussed. Is that a fair question? I think it is.

Why is it all of a sudden that these "big fish" are popping up. Thats what I'd like to figure out. Is it a particular year class that hit its peak and people are catching them?? Is it because more people are on the river and fish are being caught that weren't caught before? Is it just the popularity, people are looking for a little ink? There was an article in the Strib about a muskie guide and a 50 pounder even not all that long ago.

I mean if a guy heard of a 60 plus pounder once a summer for years, I'd buy that. But those of us frequenting this forum know that isn't the case. We all know of fish in the 50lb neighborhood but anything over 55lbs is the talk on the street from Bloomington to New Ulm.

it has been a very good year for fishing. i mean, look at all the hogs in the bass section!

i know the main reason that i am catching more big fish is because i have expanded my boundries and i spent almost the entire winter studying the lakes in the area, finding structure and all that.

who knows. it has been an odd year.

little rain around here, and the temperatures were nowhere near as hot as they were past few years when we had 80s and 90s

its been staying in the 70s and 80s. but i dont think it has hit 90 yet

we all know how temperature effects the fishing. maybe thats all it is. who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's just more people on the water this year than ever before and that's why we are hearing of these big fish. But Hanson has brought up many good points. Most people, including myself, don't have a scale that goes over 50 lbs. and the length-girth formula is only so accurate and in my experience my fish are always at least a few pounds lighter on my scale. When you get stories of fish over 60 lbs., you pretty much will need a picture as proof and accurate measurements to go with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And for the love of god, I truly hope that people are doing the right thing and releasing these big fish...I definitely have a feeling many 40+ lb fish are being kept this year and it worries me for the future of this fishery. I want to be able to enjoy Flathead Catfishing on the Minnesota River for many, many years and that is why I do my part in releasing every Catfish I have ever caught and encouraging others to do the same (selective harvest is okay for small Channels IMO but leave the Flatheads alone).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True that Jeffrey true that. Ultimately it's up to the individual angler's discretion to determine what is kept and what is released, but it will be a sad day when we go out with our kids to hook into some pigs, only to find out there are no more left.

... and if the rumors are true, remarkable! I would love to see a Minnesota flat tip the scales over 60 lbs ... truly a fish - of - a - lifetime!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

60 is the new 50 laugh

Yeah the conversion formula no doubt could be flawed with fish over 50, only because there just isn’t enough data points to prove it either way. Formulas are only as good as their input and a half inch can make quite a difference. I sure didn’t intend for such a conversion to be gospel and hoped to use it as a tool to help the C&R process. I still think it’s fairly close though as a 50x34 comes in at 66 (I have to think that it’s in the ballpark).

Elwood, those numbers you gave for your fish has me scratching my head. Almost leads me to think that their scale might have been reading low. Which is fine for a contest because it reads low for everyone. That fish should’ve been easily over 50lbs but I guess it’s also possible that the fish didn’t fit the standard body profile. There’s been so many fish in that high 40’s weight that have been witnessed by myself and people I trust with length/girth and a scale that I just have to believe your fish weighed more than that.

A big fish like that will get thrown in the net and on a scale if I catch it. We are talking about weight, so yeah that’s how you get a weight, you weigh it laugh

Hopefully in the next few years we are tossing this discussion around about 70’s.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

60 is the new 50 laugh

Sure hope so! That'll mean me getting into the 50 club will be that much easier. wink

Who's fish was 50 x 34? Is that the rumor Elwood is talking about or just a hypothetical? You wouldn't have to twist my arm very hard to believe 60 plus pounds on dimensions like that. And even if you're measurements had a margin of error +/- an inch or two, say a 48 x 33 or 49 x 32, you are still up there in very big fish land.

2 big varying factors that I can see on big fish would be pre-spawn vs post-spawn. Good girth measurement and the formula should account for that however. And whether that 60 pounder just ate a 5 lb carp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant was that the formula puts a 50x34 fish at 66lbs which seems ballparkish smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant was that the formula puts a 50x34 fish at 66lbs which seems ballparkish smile

I re-read it, thats what I thought you meant. I do agree that seams appropriate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gordie, I have heard of such fish, and have reason to doubt it. An actual witness that seen the fish caught, estimated high 30's, to low 40's. Iffin we ware talking about a fish caught last Sunday just upstream from where you seen me and my son a couple weeks ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Well Molly doesn't have any snow on her.   You been drinkin?  
    • 70 pages dealing with Donald Trump and I can't find much that says anything on the positive side, of course in the past year and a half he hasn't said much that's been positive either.
    • @Neighbor_guy    Oh, I think the dismount was memorable too. 
    • I have fished for trout in my home waters for fifty-five years. The places I call home are the waters of the Wisconsin driftless area. Trout are my favorite species to chase. The trout of my waters have fluctuated over my more than a half century of fishing. Trout are instinctual creatures.  The big wily brown trout are my quarry.  They are portrayed as superior entities when in fact they have a brain the size of a pea. Do you want the keys to the castle?   I have seen many trends and fads come and go in the trout world.  This fancy rod and that special fly have cycled through a dozen times in my lifetime. Anglers come and go and so do the latest new fangled trends.  The constants in the trout world are the seasons and good old Mother Nature.  If you want a real leg up on those trout you should pay attention to the seasons and the changes they cause in the trout’s environment.     The weather in Wisconsin can be a harsh mistress.  The extremes are the norm here.  We could have twenty inches of snow on the ground and below zero temperatures and what seems like a blink of the eye in Wisconsin it changes.  The snow could melt and the next time you go fishing it could be radically different.  You need to roll with the seasonal changes and modify the way you fish and where you fish.

        This frigid morning in January was shaping up to be a “skunk” outing.  My friend was cold and told me he had enough and wanted to head back to the vehicle.  I talked him out of heading back.  We had taken the stream temperatures earlier and we hadn’t found a one reading over thirty-six degrees.

      The outdoor temperature was twenty-six degrees and not looking like it was going to warm up.  I had scouted this area prior and our fishing was going to get better I told him.
        Do you see the log laying on the right side of the stream?  Just on the other side of the log is a tiny trickle feeding in.  This trickle is a tiny spring.  Springs run year round here at about forty-two degrees constant.  Where that spring fed in caused a six degree temperature swing just downstream.  That little trickle made the stream bearable for the trout.    I have found many trickles during the early season when the grass is down that I cannot see even a month later due to weed growth.  It was like the Bahamas in that halo of the spring.  We caught seven trout in that tiny spot. Many feeders are not easily found during the summer.  They are covered up by weeds.  You can only discover them when the weeds are down in winter or early spring. I emphasize the word trickle here because they may be tiny and you will miss them if you are not looking for them.   My friend Andy and I fished this exact hole in September.  We both caught four trout each in this bend in September.  We couldn’t buy a bite in March.  What was different now?  First off the water temperatures were in the sixties in September and in the middle thirties in March. Trout lay in different areas during cold and warm conditions.     In Wisconsin winters the trout are in survival mode.  They need to find good lays where they don’t have to expend too much energy to hold in place and wait for food. The calories required to hold in place in this cold fast water is a negative formula for calories gained. This shallow fast current hole is great when the water temperatures are in the sixties and the trout can hide in the broken fast water.  In thirty degree water this holding place has no one home.  I would look for the deepest water either direction for two hundred yards.  This is where the trout would winter.
      One picture says a thousand words.  It was twenty degrees below out this day. The water temperature at this spring head tells the tale. It measured at forty degrees.  I like to call these Bahamas causing the water temperatures to fluctuate. A thermometer is a must to get a leg up on these instinctual creatures. This spring is a glaring thermal. 

       Many anglers discount some thermals because they are not so obvious.  A swamp is nothing more than a spring spreading out and they have the same properties as a small stream emptying into a larger waterway.  There does not need to be an obvious entry point to these swamps causing thermals.  They can leech through the surrounding banks and make their way into your stream.
        I am going to stay on thermals but switch seasons.  The temperature fluctuations you found to indicate where to find the wily trout in winter holds true in the dog days of summer.  I went with a Natural Resources crew to do a shocking.     The stretch we were to shock was a non-designated area way below typical trout water.  Even on a typical summer’s day in Wisconsin this waterway was almost too warm to fish in it.  Many anglers considered this “frog water” and dismissed it.  What a giant mistake they were making. 

       When water temperatures are near seventy degrees, it is recommended not to fish for trout.  It plain and simply puts too much stress on the fish and raises the mortality rates to an unacceptable risk for the trout.  Streams that are warmer have less dissolved oxygen in them.  Trout caught in water near seventy degrees have a hard time recovering from a battle due to the lack of oxygen.     I was in charge of the thermometer and Garmin on this trek into frog water with the fisheries folks.  Every thirty yards I was asked to take the temperature and write it down with the GPS coordinates. I was asked to submerge the thermometer at least halfway to the bottom to take the readings. I needed to hold the thermometer in place for ten seconds. I also was advised to make sure there was no secondary warming from my hands holding it.  The lead worker said the trout actually live in the lower half of water columns. The water temperatures hovered around seventy degrees at first.  We did not shock up trout in these areas.   We started to shock up some trout.  They were smaller fish.  I took the temperature and there was a slight change.  I looked around for a spring or a feeder creek.  There were none to be found. The fisheries staff told me to take more frequent measurements and log them. They were trying to prove a theory they had. I measured every ten yards on this stretch.  The temperatures continued to go down. The water temperatures were in the low sixties now and we were shocking numerous trout to the surface.  It was quite amazing how the numbers and sizes of the trout increased as the water got colder on this stretch.   We shocked up some true monsters from this waterway and then they just vanished.  The alpha or large predator trout had the lays in the coolest hides.  I could not see anything feeding in.  It was a true mystery to me.  There was a swamp about thirty yards from the stream.  It had no obvious entry points.  I followed my thermometer to its access point.  The swamp leeched into the stream and the only tell tale evidence was found with my thermometer.  

       The only visual evidence was softer banks that extended a couple of feet toward the swamps near the coldest points and these were my thermals.  I would not have discovered them without my thermometer. You can guess where the biggest brown were shock up correct?  Their noses were stuck right in the area where the trickles fed in.   I fish with many folks and they must grow weary of waiting for me to quit messing with my thermometer. Some stretches I fish regularly I leave my thermometer in my vest because of my historical data. My friend Dan Braun and I took a break during the midday of fishing due to water temperatures being too high and dangerous for the trout.  The outside temperature this day was eighty-eight degrees.  Dan took a temperature check at this spring head and it measured forty degrees. It is amazing to see a light bulb go on when another angler finally figures out why I am fiddling with my thermometer.
        The next time you fire up your computer check out the thermometers for sale.  There are many new and trendy versions.  There are many kinds.  I believe a keep it simple purchase is in order.  A bungee cord to hook them to your vest is a must purchase. A durable thermometer with easy to read numbers is what I carry. 

       I have been drawn to marginal frog water for over half a century now in Wisconsin’s driftless area.  My photos of big browns don’t lie.


       
    • Moose is staying home with no ice
    • Those "extended warranties" are mainly a cheap scam. The small print will ruin your day. And buying one AFTER  you have have the vehicle for a while compounds the mess.  Don't do it.
    • Til the end of my days, I will never understand why the northern states don't just stay open til January. What's it gonna hurt?
  • Our Sponsors