james_walleye Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 I guess im not so sure that is what slots were meant for to begin with. Winnie and Vermillion have never had a problem with the numbers of walleyes in them, they had problems with the size structure of the walleyes and in both cases slots have helped that issue. I also don't believe managing a deer herd for antlers is value judgement. Many deer herds in other states are managed with the age structure of the bucks in mind. And again, if the DNR didnt see this as an issue in MN then why are certain possible restrictions coming up? If our deer herd in MN was managed for the deer herd itself and on biological reasons we would already have certain regulations in place. You don't happen to think age structure is something that should be taken account of when managing a deer herd, but many people do and many states already take that into account. They do it because a healthy deer herd shouldnt have 9 out of 10 bucks being shot at 1 1/2 years old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
propster Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 And that's the truth. And Skee, that's what I meant about the values of the side that favors the end result being that 90% of the buck harvest is yearlings - those are the regulations that are forced on us, and which affect what I see, not what I choose to shoot. What we manage for now, mostly due to public opinion, is quantity, not herd health, balanced age structure, or quality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobT Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Quote:Winnie and Vermillion have never had a problem with the numbers of walleyes in them, Then why did we refer to Vermillion as the dead sea when I was living up there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archerysniper Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Because everyone will not catch their limit every time out. Just remember 10% of the people cath 70% of the fish, same goes with hunting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archerysniper Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 I don't no about you but I'm happy going to Mille Lacs and catch walleyes that are protected by the slot it's just fun to catch them I don't care if I get to eat them it's still fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 I have no idea bob, i spent a week up there 5 years ago and caught over 200 walleyes and had 1 over 14". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subzero Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 From points to walleye inches, to agree to disgree, I know people feel strong about AR and QDM, and believe it or not QDM has worked. We started with a closed season because the deer herd was reduced to the point of not being able to hunt for a year. At that time the hunting public was very loud and stated they never wanted that to happen again. The DNR responded with the bucks only laws for a few years and them the covented doe permits. This changed the way people looked at deer hunting, shooting a deer no longer was a reason for celebration. All of a sudden a buck isn't good enough it has to be a 8 pt or better. When as sportsman is it right to make another sportsman feel less than happy because he shot a deer. He shot it in a legal and ethical manner. The size of the deer doesn't matter. During the doe permit years if someone shot a fawn there was good natured ribbing. But I never saw or heard the reactions that QDM and AR has brought out now. I do believe if I were a member of PETA I would go to these HSOforum and start this kind if discussion. After all it is easier to have sportsman work against each other than for PETA to spend the money to say that shooting a 1 1/2 year old buck wrong and shopuld be outlawed and that hunters should not be able to party hunt no matter your skill level. It is time to be united not divided. Take your best shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 2010 boys, change is a coming..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musky Buck Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 I hear ya james, truthful outlook is I don't want us to get to a point where we have to apply for buck tags and then maybe go a few years in a row where a person doesn't have the chance of taking a buck, it would really make me wonder why I bought so much land and why I'm making so many landpayments. First step is shooting our own buck, I know this is an AR thread and don't want to start a new one in case the answer is simple, but I have a question that I haven't given much thought to. Party hunting/doe permit zones. I shot a buck on Sunday of 1st weekend, tagged it,ok, so I'm licenseless, my friends wanted me to come hunt their farm with them, ok, so I did as a partyhunter(driver), their land is in a different doe permit area than mine, let's say buck party hunting ends, can I still go hunt with my friends if the same scenario played out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobT Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 If I understand what the supporters of the idea want, yes as long as you only take a legal doe. You would not be able to drop a buck if it stood there broadside at 20 yards wearing a target. It could be the buck of a lifetime scoring over 350 but off limits even if the other nineteen members in your party still had unfilled tags, you were the only one to take a deer so far, and it was one hour from sunset on the last day of your season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musky Buck Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Right on Bob, thanks, so I could still as a tagless hunter go to any doe permit zone and still party hunt on their tags for that doe zone, see I didn't think it out to well. If I'm making deer drives, I've already got a buck of a lifetime down and the gun wouldn't come off my shoulder, heck I wouldn't even be carrying it if I were driving, our plan is the drivers already have a deer so we don't carry guns, they are a pain with a scope on them in a drive anyway and the drivers are not allowed to shoot. It's all about getting the non-deer down guys and gals to get one. I'd sleep the same either way if I had to let a big buck get away. I'd hope a friend could tangle with him muzzleloading or late bow. Maybe without buck party hunting people would be more selective and pass on some. I know AR, but does anyone know how many other states allow buck party hunting ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musky Buck Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 Hopefully I can put an end to all the gray area topics and AR. Hopefully, with all of this coming out and probable changes coming in the future. If some parties decide to take a few less yearling bucks each year and some decide it's time to stop worrying if he leaves my property he's a dead goat walking and if some hunters can graduate to the next level of buck hunting and if some parties decide, hey from now on let's shoot our own buck then all of these topics and posts are well worth it and we can police our own and we can save some young bucks for the future, others that like the status quo can continue hunting the way they and or their party like to hunt. If any of this back and forth can save some young bucks it was well worth it. Support your HSO sponsers and I wish financial stability to you and yours in these tough times. I need a catchy slogan. Barney Fife " A wink's as good as a nod to a blind mule." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.