PropsterII Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 I'd love to be able to follow your reasoning a bit better OTC - think you could slip in a period here or there? It's like a race reading your posts, and I'm out of breath at the end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sticknstring Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 O.T.C. - Outrageous Treatment of Commas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O.T.C. Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Sorry, will shorten up lol. What I'm saying some is wolves hammered 240 in places right along with extra tags and bad springs. Many friends and relatives had way more wolf pics then deer in recent years. Deer were thinning down the way it was, add a 24/7 predator(s) in these wintering grounds and we found a lot of skulls and vertebra, alot of kills. 240 will rebound though, it would rebound better if wolves weren't around now. The big ? might be how'd they get here kinda, where do they cross HWY 10 at ? Sorry this old dairy farmer didn't care much about English or grammar, but will clean it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmellEsox Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 They are pretty much everywhere north and east of Hwy 10 past Little Falls. They could come from anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sticknstring Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Just ribbin' ya Musky Buhh... O.T.C.! It's nice to see you posting relevant info from your neck of the woods again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bureaucrat Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 The interesting thing is, up until about four weeks ago, there were a half dozen livestock and pet depredation reports in the outdoor news on a weekly basis. I haven't looked at last week's issue yet, but there were multiple reports of pets being hauled away in the jaws of a wolf in the city of Duluth. If the woods are empty of prey, the wolves are gonna move into yards and burbs to vacuum up whatever critters they can get their hands on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smsmith Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 The interesting thing is, up until about four weeks ago, there were a half dozen livestock and pet depredation reports in the outdoor news on a weekly basis. I haven't looked at last week's issue yet, but there were multiple reports of pets being hauled away in the jaws of a wolf in the city of Duluth. If the woods are empty of prey, the wolves are gonna move into yards and burbs to vacuum up whatever critters they can get their hands on. I hope they move to the Metro and help solve the deer overpopulation "problem" there...then move on to FiFi, Fido and Mr. Whiskers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bureaucrat Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 (Is my new avatar available now?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmellEsox Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 (Is my new avatar available now?) I don't see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveT Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I hope they move to the Metro and help solve the deer overpopulation "problem" there...then move on to FiFi, Fido and Mr. Whiskers. They may already be here. FB buddy posted this yesterday. He was in Bloomington near the river and 35W. Swears it was a wolf but I can't confirm off the pic. Definitely not colored like a coyote... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leechlake Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I'm no dog expert but the tail looks wolfie to me. At first I thought you were posting a photo of a pile of dirt...hard to see it well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sticknstring Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 How is the coloring not 'yote related? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
picksbigwagon Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Too fuzzy to tell, but the ears do look rounded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smsmith Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 No expert here either, but if I had to guess...that's either a wolf or a dog, doesn't look like a yote to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sticknstring Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Yeah, I'm certainly no expert, hence the question. I get a lot of daylight 'yotes on cam every year and they come in a variety of colors. Just curious was all. Wouldn't suprise me a bit to see a wolf in the MN river valley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smsmith Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I would expect that it would be necessary to reproduce more does than bucks simply due to the mortality rates. It would be different if they routinely dropped litters of younguns or larger quantities like fish but they don't and since a single buck can breed multiple does but does can only get pregnant once per cycle, it would be self-destructive to the species to have a 1:1 ratio.Why would mortality rates be higher for does than bucks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leechlake Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I'd say due to pregnancy issues. Biggest one may be they get whacked on the road way more than bucks except "maybe" during the rut or chase phase. Almost every dead deer on the road has no rack the majority of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smsmith Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I'd say due to pregnancy issues. Biggest one may be they get whacked on the road way more than bucks except "maybe" during the rut or chase phase. Almost every dead deer on the road has no rack the majority of the year. I used to notice that as well, then started noticing that many of those deer without antlers used to have them before somebody cut them off Lots of money to be made with deer antlers, big or small. My understanding is that there are more doe fawns dropped than buck fawns, but not significantly more. If anything, the mortality rate of bucks in MN is higher than it is for does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leechlake Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Respectfully disagree. Even at 60 mph I can see the big blood spot from a rack being removed. Sure it happens a bit but 90% plus of road kills are antler less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWKR Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 From 2009 to 2013 about 55%-57% of the fawns shot were buck fawns. If there are slightly more doe fawns than buck fawns why would the buck fawn harvest be 5-7% higher? Do they start to get a little worked up during the rut and run around a bit more than the doe fawns? Are they a little bigger so hunters are more likely to shoot them when two fawns are standing next to each other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smsmith Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Respectfully disagree. Even at 60 mph I can see the big blood spot from a rack being removed. Sure it happens a bit but 90% plus of road kills are antler less. Let's assume you're correct...do you think the few thousand does killed each year via car kills evens out the greater number of bucks harvested each year via hunting?When I mentioned antlers being removed, I didn't mean the skull plate and antlers...I meant just the antlers. They're sawed off at the base of the skull. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveT Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 How is the coloring not 'yote related? I've never seen one with that mix of light and dark, and the dark parts are darker than any yote I've seen. I don't know but it just doesn't look like a coyote to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smsmith Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 From 2009 to 2013 about 55%-57% of the fawns shot were buck fawns. If there are slightly more doe fawns than buck fawns why would the buck fawn harvest be 5-7% higher? Do they start to get a little worked up during the rut and run around a bit more than the doe fawns? Are they a little bigger so hunters are more likely to shoot them when two fawns are standing next to each other? Buck fawns are the dumbest deer in the woods They also do tend to be a bit larger than doe fawns and that likely leads to more hunters mistaking them for a young doe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmellEsox Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I think I see a pretty even mix of bucks and does smashed on the road personally. In fall, I think more are bucks. The rest of the year is probably more does. I highly doubt it is 90% does, at least where I live and drive the most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O.T.C. Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 With this topic I wonder if next year we'll be saying worst deer harvest in 21 years ? Now the wolves, automobiles, and weather will determine how many see once Spring breaks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.