Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Giving the Dome a new roof


a47mlb

Recommended Posts

Well I'm sure there was no drainage installed. There's probably no crown to the field either. Plumbing was probably not designed to handle -30F. Scoreboards not weatherproof. I'm sure there are many more I can't think of.

As to the retractable roof, the structure was not designed to handle that sized load. Maybe it could be strengthened, but I doubt it. At the end of the day it's a near 30 year old stadium that wasn't that impressive to begin with.

I think they could spruce it up inside for $150-250 million with a new or repaired roof though. Wilf's have already nixed this idea though. The suites are too small for them to rake in all of those extra millions smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe it would work to change the dome over without spending almost as much as a new stadium would cost. I think it is going to be one of those things where you are stuck with the dome, or start from scratch and build something decent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why???? Because ziggy would still not be getting parking and concession money....he now can hold the state hostage and basically get his stadium built. Maybe this time all the tax payees in the state can get an additional sales tax added with out a vote of the public (like target field)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think they could build a "box" over/around the dome so the bowl doesn't take on any weight, and put a retractable roof on the thing. Then you don't need to worry about drainage, weatherizing, etc.. Still think it could be cheaper than something brand new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it would be like putting a lean-to on a trailer house.

Exactly. Remember that if a retro-fitted Metrodome was done, we'd have to live with it for another 30-40 years. With all of the narrow concourses, bare concrete, and minimalist design it's just not a good idea.

I personally believe he should sign a short term lease on the dump and then put up some more dough for a new one. Develop and privatize the area surrounging and have some of those future dollars kick into the investment money. They will still need public funding, but the higher the percentage is from ownership, the easier it should be to get support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is/has been. This is the 4th time they have had a problem with the roof. The record snow/ice is the main reason they haven't fixed it yet. They can't safely be working on it until they get it all cleaned off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.