Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Packers / Vikings - Game 3 of 4


SkunkedAgain

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Was anyone else wondering what the hell Childress was thinking on those last 2 plays? You gotta guy with 2 fractures in his ankle so yu call 2 roll outs?

I was wondering the samething, why is he rolling out with a bad ankle. Poor play selection. Again, Chilly not making the right calls. Makes me wonder why Chilly hasn't made any coaching changes like to the o-line coach, it goes back to last season for their poor play; or why the d-line coach hasn't made any changes to get the front 4 more productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

**Referees**

- The Shiancoe catch was a great play and in my football mind should be a touchdown (like the Calvin Johnson catch). However, the nose of the ball hit the ground AND SHIFTED into Shiancoe's body as he hit the ground. Per the rules, that is not a catch. The ref's got it right.

Just heard on the news that the NFL called Chilly today and told him the call was incorrect and should have been a touchdown.

Haven't heard anything about the Matthews play where he took his helmet off while play was going on. Should have been penalized 15 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. The penalty for taking off the helmet is enforced only if it happens AFTER the play is over. Besides, the Claymaker looked like a stud ripping off his helmet and continuing with the play. Classic.

I've heard about enough of the ridiculous helmet controversy today. As if that was the biggest problem they had last night. And then to hear rubes complaining that the Lambeau Leap should be a penalty for celebration? Good grief. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I would love to saw that hair off with a buck knife. Fits right in with the rest of the Skonies though.

How long do I continue with this avatar? I feel shame..... blush

I would not wear the uniform of the offensive lineman who are to block for Farve. If Brett wouold have had a line like Rodgers, Brett may have thrown 6 TD's with that much time to throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just think! grin What would people be saying if the Vikings had won last night and a couple other games this season? One less wrong move could have made at least a couple games this year shift to the win cati. wink But!!! We lost and we have the more familiar side poking its ugly little head out. laugh Viva Minnesota & its fan base!!!!!!!!! grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not the same offensive line that gave Farve all the time in the world last season?

That offensive line was as terrible last season as it is this season. Favre was on his back a lot in the beginning of last season. Go back and watch the tapes. Once Favre threw the game-winning TD to Greg Lewis in the 49ers game, he came alive. It was Favre's ability to improvise and mobility (compared to this season) coupled with Sidney Rice that made the o-line appear adequate last season. Since the championship game ankle injury, Favre has been a lot less mobile.

The biggest problem with the Vikings is the receivers. You have three go-deep receivers in Harvin, Moss, and Berrian. Camarillo is the only possession receiver now that Rice is gone. Shiancoe should be that outlet but he hasn't been special this year. Yes, Harvin has been trying to fill the possession receiver role but he's nowhere as good at providing Favre with a dependable receiving target when there is pressure. The absence of Rice is much more than most figured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's when people and fans STOP complaining and [PoorWordUsage] that you know you've lost the fan base...that will never happen in Viking land.

and it's working like charm for us isn't it Zep. wink Once things go south, go for the jugular with on-line blogs, forums, real life MN local media and make those coaches & players who had a bad game suffer and even refuse to open their drapes and blinds while at home!!!!!

Guess what the topic was today around the lunch hour on KFAN??????? DuuuuDaaaDuuunnn! This could very well be the LAST coordinated play-off attempt season of the Vikings being in Minnesota. laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not one to ever blame the officials for a game. And we all know the vikings left alot on the field sunday night. But don't you guys get sick of these officials constantly having a such a big hand in these NFL games??? I mean come on, who tuned in to watch the officials blow so many calls the other night? And now you have challenges in which the NFL admits the right call on the field was incorrectly overturned. They can't even get the challenges right.

How many Dolphin fans paid for there tickets for sundays game so they could watch the officials take the game away from their team at the end?? In this case the officials absolutely directly had a hand in that Steelers win. Its getting to be a total farce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely agree and have been saying it since week #3. Week 1 was suspicious, then week 2 came along and it started to become more obvious the more I paid attention and it's just spiraled downwards since then. Doesn't matter what game or who's playing, they've all become an officiating mess.

I'm really tired of the officials doing a hack job on calls because they know they'll be bailed out by instant replay, such as both Harvin TD's the other night. It couldn't have been more obvious that he was out of bounds, yet they make the safe call of TD which causes the coach to burn his challenges that should be used for highly questionable plays, which these were not. This happens in almost every game but I used that example as I know most here saw the plays in question.

If there is any argument against instant replay it's clearly evident that it eventually makes the officials lazy and dependent on their "crutch".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not one to ever blame the officials for a game. And we all know the vikings left alot on the field sunday night. But don't you guys get sick of these officials constantly having a such a big hand in these NFL games??? I mean come on, who tuned in to watch the officials blow so many calls the other night? And now you have challenges in which the NFL admits the right call on the field was incorrectly overturned. They can't even get the challenges right.

How many Dolphin fans paid for there tickets for sundays game so they could watch the officials take the game away from their team at the end?? In this case the officials absolutely directly had a hand in that Steelers win. Its getting to be a total farce.

First off, I agree.

Two things going on here. Does a fan blame the officials for a loss in a single game? Sure they do, but it really takes a series of EGREGIOUS ref errors to cost a team a game. Far more often it's the team's problem, not the officials' problem.

Second thing. Are the officials ruining the game? No. They are sergeants following the orders of officers. Rip on the officers who continue to constrict football, not those charged with following those orders. Honestly, the way these rules keep coming down, it's like there are liberals on high trying to make safe a game that is inherently dangerous. Sure, you can tame it, but who likes watching Lawrence Welk? Football danced to a waltz beat ain't wunnerful! mad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree on both the last two posts. However, ONE blown call can completely determine the outcome of a game or more importantly, how the rest of the game plays out.

They need to be better and there is no excuse.

If I remember right...the officials also said (a day removed) a very important P.I. call in the last NFC Championship game was a "mistake" also.

I'm not privy to all the other teams bad calls against them throughout the past year or so but I think Viking fans have been given a reason to cry wolf on this subject.

Dolphins/Steelers game could be the one to determine a home field spot in the play-offs. That will prove to be a HUGE blown call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Foss but disagree with everything else. Officials have a hard job. MOST of those commenting on here have never been a paid official.

When it comes to replays the officials are paid to make the correct call. They are scored and graded after each game and their pay (ability to ref playoff games) is directly tied to it. They do let officials go and so you have to consistently make the right call in order to continue being a referee. So all this "laziness" talk is non-sense.

Where ref's are in a real pickle is with when to blow the whistle. They used to blow plays dead when they determined a play was over. Now with instant replay, those calls can be reversed especially when fumbles are involved. Therefore, referees have been told to hold their whistles even if they think a player may have been down by contact because the replay booth can determine whether it was a fumble or not. If the ref blows his whistle, the play is dead and there is no review. That is where they are truly handicapped.

The league has always reviewed controversial game calls and shared the results with teams. Childress was a fool for disclosing that information publicly. Yes the fans and media want to know but he wanted to do a "I told you so" more than anything. Other coaches handle these rulings with way more class. There will always be officiating mistakes and coaches can eliminate them by having their teams prepared to beat the tar out of their opponents.

It hasn't been brought up here, but it's gotten plenty of sports talk attention....the issue with Clay Matthews removing his helmet was not illegal. The league stated so. There is no rule stating that you can't do that during a play. In fact, Mike Periera (former head of officiating) posted the following:

Quote:
The helmet started coming off as he was being blocked. He then pushed it the rest of the way off because it appeared to block his vision. The interesting part is that it is not a foul. The rule book is specific when it states, it is unsportsmanlike conduct for "removal of his helmet by a player during a celebration or during a confrontation with a game official or another player." What happened in the Green Bay game was not unsportsmanlike conduct but it was stupid in my opinion. Maybe this is Matthews' solution for not getting called for a helmet-to-helmet hit on a defenseless player.

As for the Vikings getting hosed argument, nobody else in the country is showing any sympathy or giving it ANY play so Vikings fans should take that as a sign to stop complaining because they weren't hosed worse than any other team. The only controversy being discussed at any length is Favre and Childress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.