Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dudewheresmyboat

HELP! Which motorized decoy to get?????

15 posts in this topic

I'm a first year Duck hunter, and now I'm hooked!!! I'm looking for opinions on a Mojo or similar decoy, hope to buy soon for future use. What would you recommend and why? Does it really attract the birds or not? Just looking for opinions. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure you will get alot of different views on what kinds

but for myself I use the Mojo's and personally like them. The selling point for me is the durability,factor (metal wings etc) They can withstand some abuse. I have been known to put my equipment to the test and they have answered the call. I will admit they are a little noisy but WD40 can create miracles. As far as attracting birds some will tell you they have had good and negative results but I wont hunt without them. I'm that much of a beleiver. We use use windducks until we can legally use our motorized one's. The late season mallards really key on them and as far as field hunting mallards set a few out and the ducks will be right in your lap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

icehawk is right on it! I have a lot of success with mojos and do perfer the metal winged ones. We have also made a "vortex machine" that spins 2 lucky ducks around that works wonders also. They work better on land than water IMO! Water i have more successs with a jerk string. On land however they work great. But you still do have to scout and find the birds and what field they want to have the quality hunts. Find where they roost and follow them off in the morning and find where there going and get that field or fields on the path. Same method goes for Geese but i would eliminate the mojo's. They dont like mojos all that much. Have shot a few geese over mojo's but most of the time they flare!!!

Oh yeah and welcome to the sport of duck hunting! If you have any other questions just ask and good luck on the rest of the season and seasons to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use 2-3 mojos on water (Flooded Rice, Sheet water in fields) or field and they have worked great for me this year. Like rattle said he sees them work better on Land, its the same way for me. Make sure you use them where they are legal! Only problem I have is that the wings come off sometimes, and sinks in water if youre hunting on water...they also make magnet wings without screws and hassle, I have not tried them but I've consider trying them. You won't go wrong with any MOJO you buy...robos get the job done too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a mojo floater this year and love it. Adds real-life motion to the decoys. If you hunt water thsi is the way to go, no stakes to worrk about, just set it out and let it works its mojo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have two floaters and love them one is a mallard master with little splashy deals that can be used to create havoc on the water( lots of motion and ripples) and one is a wonderduk(sp) thier are pro's and cons to all of them just try and get one on sale I have an expedite on a stick and three wind driven ones also. everyone has one thats why I have five out sometimes. good luck and hope you find one on sale as I said b4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Lucky duck with the remote and haven't seemed to break it yet. It's quiet and dose what it's supposed to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Lucky duck with the remote and haven't seemed to break it yet. It's quiet and dose what it's supposed to do.

ive seen your other posts and know you hunt dakotas as well, but for first time shoppers of motorized decoys, remotes are not legal in minnesota.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remotes are not legal in minnesota.

Where does it say that? Please share, because it's not in the waterfowl regs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

97B.085 USE OF RADIOS TO TAKE ANIMALS.

Subdivision 1.Radio use in taking game prohibited.

A person may not use radio equipment to take big game or small game.

Subd. 2.Taking unprotected wild animals; permit required.

A person may not use radio equipment to take unprotected wild animals without a permit. The commissioner may issue a permit to take unprotected animals with radio equipment. The commissioner shall cancel the permit upon receiving a valid complaint of misconduct regarding the permittee's hunting activities.

Subd. 3.Communication excepted.

This section does not prohibit the use of:

(1) one-way radio communication between a handler and a dog; or

(2) a remote-controlled animal noise caller for taking crows, fur-bearing animals, and unprotected animals.

History:

1986 c 386 art 2 s 18; 1991 c 166 s 1; 1992 c 479 s 1; 2007 c 131 art 1 s 40

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from experience....

The Mojo with metal wings is a good choice. BUT it eats up batteries faster than any other brand. It creates a good flash, and is effective

The Lucky will run FOREVER! Creates god flash, is effective. Builet very well.

Overall I would get a Lucky with metal wings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is right out of the MN Hunting Regulations. Page 28 on the bottom of the page.

Radios and Other Wireless Devices

• Using walkie talkies, cell phones, remote control or other radio

equipment to take big game or small game is unlawful.

• A DNR permit is required to take unprotected animals with the

aid of radio equipment, see page 25.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry guys for the late reply and Thanks for all the info. I will be buying a Mojo, the one with metal wings. I hunt WI and they are legal. I went to a few local stores in the metro and well they are sold out. Its kind of late to be looking. Anyone find a good deal let me know! THanks! Anyone still ducking???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going out this weekend to try and shoot a couple hardy mallards, planing on busting a hole in a river between the roost and field they are feeding in and coaxing a few down with the call.

I got some advice for you on the mojo however, if your hunting and the ducks wont decoy or are decoy shy take it down, they dont work as well as they used to and become mojo wary very fast. Good luck man and I hope your succesful, waterfowling can be very exciting and its nice to hear about new people geting into the sport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a mojo floater this year and love it. Adds real-life motion to the decoys. If you hunt water thsi is the way to go, no stakes to worrk about, just set it out and let it works its mojo.

Diddo. Bought one this fall and used it all season with great luck on anything from redheads to ringnecks to mallards decoying right in. I mostly hunt water for ducks, but I'm going to make a little pole that I can use to get it up in the air for visibility when field hunting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I have seen 3 different flocks of Swan's in the past week. I have also seen small flocks of little birds that look to be migrating.
    • MCI:   Sorry, but Waylon's only interests in life are ducks and my dirty laundry. I didn't start really getting into the shed hunting until recently so I didn't train him for it. I will probably do so with my next pup. He just tags along.   With the increase in popularity of shed hunting there is plenty of information out there. I know a few shed dogs and I know it's not as easy to get them excited about old bone then about a nice stinky duck, but definitely possible. The guys I know also compete in local shed competitions (staged courses) , so if you look into that type of thing there should be a group of guys with a lot of knowledge.
    • Trump is the enemy of the truth ! 
    •   Shouldn't be hard to come up with a way to fill a 1/4 inch gap, it seems to me.   Rip some strips of something, maybe even that synthetic decking, trex or something.    Then you could have the vinyl
    •   *marks "leech brings up someone's location as evidence their opinions are not relevant" on sillytown bingo card*   I'm one "big dave says you just don't understand freedom" away from a BINGO!
    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       
  • Our Sponsors