Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest

spend $299 on aqua-view? yes or no

16 posts in this topic

i know this topic pops up all the time, but i put a house on mille this year and i am thinking about getting an aqua-view. Is it worth $300 for the unit? I can either get a MC2X or IR for $299.
Is the newer (brighter) MC2X better over the IR?
Please give me an idea if its worth it for ice and open water.
Thanks and good fishing to all who get to ejoy the earlier ice!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Jigstick. My answer would be "depends on whether you have a Vexilar yet or not." You need to have the NECESSITIES before you buy any TOYS. A buddy has an OVS camera, which we've had some fun with, but we usually leave it home and bring along two Vexes. The camera can be very helpful to locate schools during the open water season!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought mine at a sale (return) for $ 55 and I use it sometimes, but I cannot see justifying $ 300 just to look at fish down there. It's unpractical, but entertaining on permanent house (helps killing time when they don't bite) and you might be able to see what fish is down there, but as a "need" I sincerely not recommend it. Spend money on a good flasher, that will help a lot your fishing, much more than camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use mine only for pre-fishing tournaments, it helps to see what you looking at on the graph. If you're not fishing tournaments, spend the money on a good depth finder you won't be disappointed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try renting one and see how you like it.
I got mine for X-mas 3 years ago. I used it alot the first year. Last year we pulled it out to locate a cell phone that went down a hole. It don't get much use and seeings that it was a gift I plan on keeping it...
Good Luck...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that a flasher is the important thing to have, but cameras are very fun. I don't use the camera much for actual fishing, but I could spend hours on the lake just looking around. It's great seeing what the structure really looks like & how the fish relate to it. You can learn a lot with a camera. I use a camera that my brother built with one of those spy cams, some pvc pipe & a small b/w tv. The same technology as the Aqua-Vu but only about $100 to make. Try hooking the underwater cam up to a video camera. You can shoot some great underwater video that's fun to review at home. Vern

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

spend that money on a digital camera and take some shots of the fish you catch, not the ones you want to catch, they're not worth the money to me, im sure they have some uses but how often?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you will be happy with it, I can't find an aqua view I am satisfied with. You just can't see far enough to make them usefull, plain and simple. They are not worth the effort of hauling them out, invest the same money in a nice trap so you can be faster on the move, that will imporve your fishing much more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love my camera. I find epecially useful in the summer.
In one case. I found out I was fishing for a school of redhorse instead of walleyes.

The camera teaches you exactly what the locator is showing. Hard bottom, concrete pilings, clambeds etc.

It is quite a bit of work to drag it around and set up but once it is set in a fish house it is good until you decide to move.

I also like to to see fishes responses to different lures. It is more of a learning tool than a fishing tool.

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am split on the whole Aqua View deal. I agree with some that if you absolutely need something to fish get a Flasher! They will tell much more in the long run and help you to catch fish. On the other hand, Aqua Views are cool to use. Looking at bottom structure, looking at fish, finding dropped fishing utensils...the list goes on and on. How ever in order to fish at night you will absolutely need at least the MCX2. Which will run you about $400. There are higher priced versions with more bells and whistles but you don't necessarily need them. Watch for sales on them too. Occassionaly you can get them cheaper. Good Luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all the great info so far.

i found a used catch cam at a local store that buys & sells equip. it worked, but the magnifying lense was scratched. With no battery, it was $189.95, and a couple of years old. i saw they had a new one there for $269. battery was $16.99 without charger. they only dicounted the unit 30%, now that doesn't come with a return policy or warranty. and the guy said he'd throw in a fin with it. It really didn't seem like as good of a deal the more i thought about it. Does anyone else think that seems steep. i was thinking i should only buy if i could get the price down quite a bit more. its multiple years old after all. a retail store would throw a very used electronic device on clearance shelf for 30% or more off, plus it wouldn't be as old. is it worth bargaining?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OKs, this one's got me stumped. I've seen these posts for a year, and finally I'm going to ackowledge that there must be SOMETHING I'm missing.

I've looked through those cameras, and enjoyed what I saw: The fish, the lure action, the fish's response to the lure, the structure, etc. Not only a learning tool, but a fish locator tool.

And I own a Vex, an FL8-SLT. It's on its fifth year with me.

Here's the rub. With the Vex, you're INTERPRETING the signal, in effect making educated guesses about what's down there.

With the camera, you're SEEING IT ALL. No guesses. So how can a Vex be more effective than an Aqua-Vu, especially in a permanent house, where you don't have to lug the camera around?

Is this a duh! moment for stfcatfish?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say the biggest thing is that you are very limitted in what you can see with the camera. Crappies make for a good example- if your camera is looking at the bottom few feet of the water column, you could have a whole school of crappies scoot through a foot above the camera and never have a clue they were there! With the vex you get a look a the whole water column.
I'll definitely grant you though, the camera gives you different information that can be useful.
Another thing to consider- light, dark, gin clear water, murky water, etc... the vex has not problem where the camera will be greatly effected.
Scoot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A vexilar is a much better tool for ice fishing in my opinion. You can find the depth without haveing to drill through the ice. If a minnow is down there, you will mark it.

An Aqua-Vu is an AWESOME tool...but mainly for open water. A Vex doesnt help me much in open water...and an Aqua-Vu doesnt help much on the ice.

P.S. If you can afford it, get BOTH!

[This message has been edited by tjwierz2 (edited 12-11-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must say that the new downviewing fin is rather helpfull for a different Vu. Genz has been using it and is very impressed. As far as what to get, I guess I'm just lucky I grew up with both a clearwater classic flasher(IMHO still one of the best) and an Aqua-Vu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • That is a good point to make. I never thought about the extra torque that is needed for the chipper blades witch I think is why the SM Electra has such a short battery life and NOT to get it confused with SM lithium lazer and no the SM doesn't have reverse.  The reverse isn't a huge selling point for me but it is a plus.  The more I read comments about ION I might have to get me one.
    • Very nice work again LRG! Like many others, I have gotten a lot of good information from your postings on here and greatly appreciate it! I am in the process of building a 22' house now myself and know the extra time and effort it takes to document progress. I plan to share some of my experiences when I'm closer to finished. Once again thank you very much for sharing and great work!
    • PB is always the go-to bait.
    • Never even thought of that will check but I think it should be fine though.     Seems dark with the skirt laying flat, windows, vents, and doors shut set up in the basement with lots of lights on seems nice and dark. Wouldn't know till I get out there and try it I guess.
    • I talked to the guys who measure the precip up at the meetings I recently attended. Asked them when they were having the party to celebrate. We were fortunate here. Plenty of rain but managed to escape several of the major poundings they got just 13 miles to the north. More on that here:   This boat is blacked out like a city
      Awaiting bombers in the night   While there were no 50 degree highs the scurs and their trusty Weather Eye still kept things above zero and largely above freezing. ? Starting Wednesday, partly sunny with a slight chance of snow. Highs in the low 20’s with lows in the low teens. Thursday, mostly cloudy with a slight chance of snow in the forenoon. Highs in the low 20’s with lows around 10. Mostly sunny Friday with increasing clouds with a modest chance of snow in the evening. Highs in the upper teens with lows in the mid-teens. Saturday, mostly cloudy with a moderate chance of snow.  Highs in the mid-20’s with lows in the upper teens. Mostly cloudy on Sunday with a slight chance of forenoon snow. Highs in the mid-20’s with lows in the upper teens. Monday, mostly cloudy with a chance of flurries. Highs in the mid-20’s with lows in the lower double digits. Mostly cloudy for Tuesday with a continued chance for snow showers. Highs in the low 20’s with lows in the mid-single digits, still above zero.  The normal high for December 13th is 27 and the normal low is 10. We’ll be down to 8 hours and 56 minutes of daylight on the 13th. The scurs procrastination is paying off once again. With the short days and all the cloudy weather it’s better for napping than shopping anyway.   The Full Moon for the month also will occur on the 13th and is known as the Full Cold Moon, The Moon before the Yule or the Long Nights Moon, aptly named with the short days we are experiencing. The Ojibwe called this the Small Spirits Moon and the Sioux named it the Moon of Popping Trees. At the ranch we know it as the Moon of Frozen Water Buckets. Measurable snow fell in Bugtussle and at the ranch for the first time this winter season on Saturday night into Sunday a.m.  An inch of snow which melted down to .09” of liquid equivalent precipitation. It was all but melted by early afternoon accumulating into the soil which remained unfrozen. The soil profile down to the 5’ depth was had a little over 10” of available moisture in it back on November 2nd. There’s little reason to believe it’s a lot drier than that even though we were slightly below the normal 2.16” of precip at the SROC for last month.   Speaking of the SROC, hats off (and swim fins on) for their recent setting of the annual precipitation record for MN. The record of 53.73” was set back on November 28th; they’ve received more since then and have the rest of December to add to it. Records in Bugtussle are incomplete as the gauge was not functional until April 7th. At the ranch we garnered 43.25” by the end of November. Let’s hope we don’t play catch up.   Some isolated areas of remaining corn were rumored to have been picked but aside from that, very little fieldwork was accomplished this past week. Some are still hoping to get one more crack at some tillage or anhydrous ammonia application although that window will likely close quickly given the forecast. It also remains questionable how well the ground will seal and whether the knives on the applicators will ball up. It really hasn’t dried up to speak of.   At the Lions pancake feed Sunday it was great to see Buddy Shurson in attendance. For those of you who didn’t read the wonderful article that included Buddy a few weeks ago, he was a gunner on a B-17 during WWII. Until after I saw him I’d almost forgotten that Wednesday the 7th marks the 75th anniversary of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. I still remember my parents telling me what dark days in history those were after that. On the farm war time rationing made everyone feel the pinch and there was some jealousy when someone got something they didn’t think you should have. I recall Dad telling about neighbors questioning how he wound up with a small, 12” rubber tire on the mounted International sickle mower he’d purchased. Yes, things were that tight.   Back to the B-17. It was a marvel of modern aviation at the time. When first being developed in the mid-1930’s, it was equipped with Pratt and Whitney engines. However, more power was needed so the engines were switched exclusively to the Wright R-1820-97 turbo-supercharged “Cyclone” that developed 1200 hp apiece. There were four wing mounted engines on this aircraft. While not extraordinary by today’s standards, they were beefy enough to allow the aircraft to limp home even if a couple engines had been knocked out. No small feat for a plane weighing over 36,000 lbs. when empty and 54,000 lbs. when loaded.   Who manufactured the engines? During WWII, one of the manufacturers licensed by Wright to produce them was Studebaker. By the time Pearl Harbor was bombed, the company had already converted much of their assembly line capacity in anticipation of our entry into the war, suspending much of its 1942 model year production. A new plant was added for production of the Cyclone. They built over 63,000 of these radial aircraft engines for the B-17’s in the war effort. From January 1944 through the summer of 1945, all B-17 engines were supplied by Studebaker. The company also built nearly 200,000 trucks most of which went to the Soviet Union and over 15,000 Weasels, an all-terrain tracked vehicle. When I look at the Studebakers in our garage, it gives me an appreciation of their place in American history. When I see Buddy, it also makes me happy to know that somewhere along the line the company probably had an impact on bringing our own local piece of American history back home safely. Thanks Buddy and to all who served!   See you next week…real good then.  
    • With President-elect Donald Trump soon taking office, businesses are optimistic about the soon-to-be-changing economic landscape in the country. United States Steel is one such company that is already planning to do things differently under a Trump administration. "We already structured to do some things, but when you see in the near future improvement to the tax laws, improvements to regulation, those two things by themselves may be a significant driver to what we're going to do," CEO Mario Longhi said in an interview with CNBC. "I'd be more than happy to bring back the employees we've been forced to lay off during that depressive period," he added, which "could be close to 10,000 jobs."       OH, MY..  
    • Big Dave...   Thought he was on a roll...     Whoops !!..  
    • 16" caught up N of DL on a lake Jim Uran introduced me to...it is PB through the ice.
    • Saw two houses about 50 yards out on a part of wahkon bay yesterday on Mille lacs. Flip over and a hub style one. I think that area was open water on Monday and possibly still on Tue. Be safe people........
  • Our Sponsors