Sifty Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 The right-rear side of Newman's No. 12 Penske Racing Dodge car did not match the height sticks.Sounds like they needed a little down force on the car.Sifty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawdog Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 100 points and a six week vacation for the crew chief! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassNspear Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 gota love this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAPAFISH Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I have him on my fantasy team. This really blows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnsonator Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 Will it affect ours scores of last weeks race if we had Newman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwhjr Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I don't think it affects the scores, it only takes away from his points to get into the chase. There was a similar "incident" earlier in the year when Edwards was docked 100 points in the standings. I think Newman lost 25 on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy airjer W Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Usually the only time it will affect the scores is if the infraction is severe enough to remove the driver of his finishing position. This has happened at least one time in the two previous years and its a huge pain! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawdog Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 What a crock! 25 points??? All the COT penalties have been the same and then this??? How do they justify this garbage?!?!?!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 NASCAR rules are like all others, depends on who you are what the mood is for NASCAR. They just prove it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOF#13 Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 I was really wondering the same thing. I wonder what the deal is??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMITOUT Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Come on, we've been though this before. If it doesn't relate to the COT body or it's aerodynamic pieces, the penalty is less severe. The car fit the templates and the body was per NASCAR specs. It was a chassis issue not a body issue, and the body is where NASCAR drops the 100pt hammer. It slips my mind right now, but there was a similar situation before this one and NASCAR has been consistent in this delineation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barek68 Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 how come nobody says there cheating, it was that way with edwards. Go roush and the Ford boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Bill Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Originally Posted By: lawdogWhat a crock! 25 points??? All the COT penalties have been the same and then this??? How do they justify this garbage?!?!?!!!!! Did'nt gordini's shock mount bolts "malfunction" last year ?There was no fine, no point loss, no vacation for the crew chief.Just a big ol hug from NASCAR.I think that set the precedent for this kind of "garbage". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PierBridge Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Wrong again Bill! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Bill Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Originally Posted By: PierBridgeWrong again Bill! 2007 Speedweeks when they discovered that Jeff Gordon's shock mounts were improperly installed after qualifying for the Daytona 500. After deeming the move was not deliberate, the No. 24 had to start his qualifying race from the back of the field instead of face a fine or a loss of points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnsonator Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 This same infraction happened last year when Edwards car was too low. Even though the car being lower did not help downforce at all, they still penalized him because it was not within the parameters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricbak Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 I also wondered the same thing? Isn't A rule infraction A "RULE INFRACTION"? So was the car that was to high in the right rear less guilty than the car "Carl Edwards car" with the missing oil cap? Maybe Roger Penske's name has something to do with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PierBridge Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 Apples and Oranges Bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts