Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Strib Article: New Study Sheds Light on Wolves, Moose


Recommended Posts

I disagree,I think the study is a good one,and yes wolves are a factor,but when you see numerous moose for a few years in a row with no hair due too excessive tick infestation due to warm winters,many of these moose also died.

Yes I also seen wolves work in a area for moose also.

Also the DNR had a deer study back in 1995-1997 where like winter of 1995-96 90% of the fawns died because of the hard winter, yes wolves ate good,but majority of dead deer were untouched,friends and I found over 20 dead deer just curled up and not fed on.

Nature has many punches,yes wolves is one of them and also hunters also is one of them when we over harvest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much more complicated than a simple predator / prey relationship. It has much to do with climate change 1st and foremost and this IS the main factor for low deer numbers in the north, then secondary impacts are the food that depends directly on the climate itself then.... predators like Black Bear, Coyotes and Wolves. Coyotes and Bear probably account for more white tailed deer calf mortality state wide than the wolves do but people LOVE to bi##Ch about the wolf. They (we) have for thousands of years as a matter of fact. (wolves are just soooo easy for the simple to blame because they are visible, highly publicized, news worthy, discussion worthy, recently managed and a success story, and they happen to have been interjected as the villain in many of our childhood fairy-tales. After human impacts and manipulation of environment, pressure, hunting, deer vehicle collisions etc THEN comes - predator prey relationships like Bear, Coyote, and wolf - then comes - disease, parasitism - food source availability and carrying capacity of ecosystem, quality and availability of shelter from elements, cold and deep snow, but, the thing is - all of this and more is included on the list of things that effect deer populations and any ecological population study - is exceptionally difficult due to vast size and number of variables - and rarely is a single definitive conclusion arrived.

Just WAY easier to say - Its cuz of the wolves and move on. Human nature guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Studies in the 70's showed bear average about 3 deer a year,and mostly fawns shortly after birth. Even male Fischer averaged 0.5 deer per year.

In many deer populations with established territories, a wolf pack will take between 2-3 deer per sq. mile on average. A territory many times is 36 sq. miles or so.

I think bobcat was like 1 deer per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Studies in the 70's showed bear average about 3 deer a year,and mostly fawns shortly after birth. Even male Fischer averaged 0.5 deer per year.

In many deer populations with established territories, a wolf pack will take between 2-3 deer per sq. mile on average. A territory many times is 36 sq. miles or so.

I think bobcat was like 1 deer per year.

Strib Article: New Study Sheds Light on Wolves, Moose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much more complicated than a simple predator / prey relationship. It has much to do with climate change 1st and foremost and this IS the main factor for low deer numbers in the north, then secondary impacts are the food that depends directly on the climate itself then.... predators like Black Bear, Coyotes and Wolves. Coyotes and Bear probably account for more white tailed deer calf mortality state wide than the wolves do but people LOVE to bi##Ch about the wolf. They (we) have for thousands of years as a matter of fact. (wolves are just soooo easy for the simple to blame because they are visible, highly publicized, news worthy, discussion worthy, recently managed and a success story, and they happen to have been interjected as the villain in many of our childhood fairy-tales. After human impacts and manipulation of environment, pressure, hunting, deer vehicle collisions etc THEN comes - predator prey relationships like Bear, Coyote, and wolf - then comes - disease, parasitism - food source availability and carrying capacity of ecosystem, quality and availability of shelter from elements, cold and deep snow, but, the thing is - all of this and more is included on the list of things that effect deer populations and any ecological population study - is exceptionally difficult due to vast size and number of variables - and rarely is a single definitive conclusion arrived.

Just WAY easier to say - Its cuz of the wolves and move on. Human nature guys.

References?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.