brian6715 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Reason? Pheasants and muskies? Comparable? Wanna talk about reason? +1cbrooks I really don't see a lot of reason either, other than the fact that you want to argue something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrooks Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Both are invasive or so people say they are hence the comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanson Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Pheasants are not native to Minnesota, let alone this country. They were put here.I'm guessing the "pheasant" connection was pointed out because your username is "BrdHunter01". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrooks Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I'm sorry to be coming out the way I did Brdhunter01. Just attacking something saying you don't like goes no where. Just say your reason for not wanting muskies stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrdHunter01 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Pheasants are not native to Minnesota, let alone this country. They were put here. I'm guessing the "pheasant" connection was pointed out because your username is "BrdHunter01". Thanks for clearing that up! A pheasant is like a muskie. Now I get it! I'll be sure to pass that on to my kids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrdHunter01 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I'm sorry to be coming out the way I did Brdhunter01. Just attacking something saying you don't like goes no where. Just say your reason for not wanting muskies stock. I've stated it many times in various forums.... Do you live near the chain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrooks Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrdHunter01 Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 K then don't tell me what we should put in these lakes! If you know anything at all you would know how the DNR managed another species they stocked in the chain... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
propster Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 And he still doesn't get it. And he started it. Unbelievable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrooks Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Set me straight man. What do they stock? Why should they stock one fish and not another? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanson Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 K then don't tell me what we should put in these lakes! If you know anything at all you would know how the DNR managed another species they stocked in the chain... Catfish? One of the best channel cat fisheries around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esox_Magnum Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Do most of you non muskie fisherman realise that by adding muskies to a sytem it will make it a better fisherie??? I'm glad I live and fish on muskie waters, the best fishing in the state for all species of fish. Quality walley, perch, monster gills, crappies, pike smallouth and largemouth. So in the 40 years muskies have been in my waters the fishing remains fantstic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrooks Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 I'm guessing the DNR wouldn't want to stock another fish that would out compete another fish that they stock. That wouldn't make any sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10,000 Casts Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Quote:K then don't tell me what we should put in these lakes! and who are you to say to not put them in? I trust the DNRwith ALL of our species.. weather it is pheasants, deer, walleyes, catfish turkey ect... They are doing an awesome job and we are lucky to be sportsman in MN.And Merk, dude.... spend your time reading and searching for REAL facts like the guys you always argue against do.. Why do you even waste your time with generic and vague statements? They don't get anywhere on here. Let's be positive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyleharty Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Don't really want to get into the argument here but the lakes are public water belonging to everyone. Doesn't matter whether you live on or near the lake or the other side of the state, we all own the waters. Another slant the Channel 5 promo was trying to play; talking like the lake belongs to the homeowners on the lake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrax Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Muskie angling by men/women/children is reasonably seen as the fastest growing aspect of fishing in MN for any species. Its recent growth has been explosive. The MNDNR doesn't take the addition of a fish like this into any body of water lightly, any fish into any body of water for that matter but as a "fishing" state it only makes sense to at least consider expanding opportunities for this segment of anglers.Not all lakeshore owners are on board, not all area residents will be on board nor should they all be expected to be on board for a change like this. Whats funny is the piling on of people like Merk who show their true colors as anti-muskie folks. No one is threatening northern pike spearing in any of these waters are they?Its well known amongst the angling community that fishing on most/all muskie waters is fantastic for pretty much everything that swims in the lake including stocked muskie waters. Bemidji - wow tremendous walleye angling. Vermilion - super fishery for big pike, smallies and walleyes. Oh don't forget its also full of nice pannies too! Anyone ever fish walleyes on Plantagenet? If not you should cause its awesome. Fishing in muskie waters in the DL area is pretty darn good. Alex? Miltona? Maybe not every situation in every state has worked out super awesome, but almost all of them have and the MNDNR has proven over and over again to make intelligent decisions on stocking muskies.In many waters muskies simply replace a top predator that was there naturally but has been unnaturally removed - big pike! These predators keep lakes in proper balance. Given restrictions on harvest and the overall catch and release ethic of most muskie anglers, muskies can bring the ecology of a lake back in line and provide better opportunities for everyone who enjoys the water for any species they choose to pursue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merkman Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Muskie angling by men/women/children is reasonably seen as the fastest growing aspect of fishing in MN for any species. Its recent growth has been explosive. The MNDNR doesn't take the addition of a fish like this into any body of water lightly, any fish into any body of water for that matter but as a "fishing" state it only makes sense to at least consider expanding opportunities for this segment of anglers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foulpole18 Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 We're still ahead of spearfisherman Merk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merkman Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 We're still ahead of spearfisherman Merk. Third column over foulpole.I see nothing about the method on this graph only the species. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foulpole18 Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Wasn't refering to your graph Merk. Using all your infinite ability for stats, you can find the one that says I'm right. That there are more musky fisherman than spear chuckers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrooks Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Merk whats your dog in this fight? It has nothing to do with spearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbrooks Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Forget it. I just remember the MDAA is against muskie stocking proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Peterson Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 I've never met a muskie fisherman that I agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Peterson Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 More muskie fisherman than "spear chuckers?" What world do you live in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foulpole18 Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Why is that Jack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now