Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Ice auger 8" vs 10"


mojoputter

Recommended Posts

Looking to buy a new or used auger, and wanting to know the advantages or disadvantages of a 8" vs 10" auger. You don't have to tell me the hole is 2" bigger, thats obvious. Never owned one so just wanting to know what would be the better buy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you do any amount of pike or laker fishing, you will greatly appreciate the larger 10" hole. Much easier to turn larger fish's heads into the hole when they come in right under the ice.

The only reason I would have a smaller auger was if I was fishing panfish exclusively or hole hopped ALOT and want a light, fast drilling auger. With that being said you can always pick up a smaller drill for the powerhead from your 10" and have the best of both worlds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 10” is bigger, heavier and will take more torque to cut through the ice which usually results in a little more elbow grease to punch the hole. The hole itself will be a magnet for valuable items and maybe even a foot or a leg or two.

But, it IS very nice to fish out of a 10” hole. You have more room for Flasher cables, the fish come up a lot easier and it just seems easier overall, especially when targeting larger profile fish.

I think an 8” is probably the most versatile and is a good compromise. If you do the math, the circumference of an 8” hole is about 25”. That is a VERY large girth. With a 10” auger, you would gain about 6” of circumference at 31”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an 8 inch. For me weight was the big factor. I was able to go with the smaller power head. A 10 inch really needs a 3hp head and with the bigger auger and bigger power head things get a little heavy.

Also, in a small portable the 10 inchers seem to swallow items (cell phones, ice scoops, etc.) a lot faster than 8 inchers.

I agree with Dead Sea on the big pike and laker issue, but if you don't ever fish that way, then 8 inches is plenty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you primarily fish out of a porty, I would highly recommend the 8". Floor space can be a premium as can weight. I went with the 8" mainly due to fear of one of my small children falling through...glad I did too as the boy seems to find every hole I drill with his foot. Better a foot than a body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice but I'm not a panfish guy. I catch Walleyes over 30 and Pike over 40 and the bigger hole for sure makes for an easier time steering them up and into the hole whether there bo 8 or 40 inches of ice!

Believe it or not I have had fish up to the ice that would never come thru an 8 inch hole!

Better to have and not need than need and not have!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Lazer Pro 10 inch SOLO and I love it. I use to have an 8 inch hole auger and have lost some big fish because of it in the past. This is why I decided to upgrade. My Lazer PRO 10 inch is only 2 pounds heavier than an 8 inch Lazer Pro... 2 lbs extra is nothing for us guys and that bigger ice hole can come in handy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After cutting with a rocket fast Strikemaster XL3000 3 hp 10-inch for 10 years, last year I switched to an 8-inch hole. While it's easier to turn the head of a big fish up a 10-inch hole, I can pull a 25+ pound laker or pike through the circumference of the 8-inch. These are the two species I target all winter. I like the 8-inch because it's lighter, which matters to me as I get older.

If I'm on water that offers an honest chance of a 30 lb laker or pike, I can easily overlap holes with the 8 to create a double hole or a triple hole (triple looks like a three-leaf clover).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a 10" lazer and didn't mind it all, still cut faster than my buddy's 8" jiffy. I mainly went with the 10" at first because I didn't own a vexilar and did a lot of sight fishing, but since the vexilar purchase a few years ago I went and bought the 9" auger so the vexi wouldn't find it's way down the hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stepped backwards into a 10" hole once also, not an experience I want to repeat. I still have the 10" auger blade hanging in the garage. I now have the 8" and can at least handle the weight of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be a smart aleck here but a trout or pike in the high 20# range will have a girth of 25+ inches depending on the length, and an 8" hole has a 25 1/8" girth. Yes a fish that is a bit larger can be squeezed through, but that requires a gaff and hopefully the hook holds and the line doesnt break while you gaff the fish.

Not that happens frequently, but you never know......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this time last year I needed a new auger, and all that was left were 10". It works great, but I really don't need the bigger hole, and it is heavier, it may not be much, but in 20-30 years, some of you will think it is alot of weight. Also, I will have to wait longer to take my grandson fishing, right now he would slide right down the hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.