Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Ice auger 8" vs 10"


mojoputter

Recommended Posts

If you do any amount of pike or laker fishing, you will greatly appreciate the larger 10" hole. Much easier to turn larger fish's heads into the hole when they come in right under the ice.

The only reason I would have a smaller auger was if I was fishing panfish exclusively or hole hopped ALOT and want a light, fast drilling auger. With that being said you can always pick up a smaller drill for the powerhead from your 10" and have the best of both worlds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 10” is bigger, heavier and will take more torque to cut through the ice which usually results in a little more elbow grease to punch the hole. The hole itself will be a magnet for valuable items and maybe even a foot or a leg or two.

But, it IS very nice to fish out of a 10” hole. You have more room for Flasher cables, the fish come up a lot easier and it just seems easier overall, especially when targeting larger profile fish.

I think an 8” is probably the most versatile and is a good compromise. If you do the math, the circumference of an 8” hole is about 25”. That is a VERY large girth. With a 10” auger, you would gain about 6” of circumference at 31”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an 8 inch. For me weight was the big factor. I was able to go with the smaller power head. A 10 inch really needs a 3hp head and with the bigger auger and bigger power head things get a little heavy.

Also, in a small portable the 10 inchers seem to swallow items (cell phones, ice scoops, etc.) a lot faster than 8 inchers.

I agree with Dead Sea on the big pike and laker issue, but if you don't ever fish that way, then 8 inches is plenty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you primarily fish out of a porty, I would highly recommend the 8". Floor space can be a premium as can weight. I went with the 8" mainly due to fear of one of my small children falling through...glad I did too as the boy seems to find every hole I drill with his foot. Better a foot than a body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice but I'm not a panfish guy. I catch Walleyes over 30 and Pike over 40 and the bigger hole for sure makes for an easier time steering them up and into the hole whether there bo 8 or 40 inches of ice!

Believe it or not I have had fish up to the ice that would never come thru an 8 inch hole!

Better to have and not need than need and not have!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Lazer Pro 10 inch SOLO and I love it. I use to have an 8 inch hole auger and have lost some big fish because of it in the past. This is why I decided to upgrade. My Lazer PRO 10 inch is only 2 pounds heavier than an 8 inch Lazer Pro... 2 lbs extra is nothing for us guys and that bigger ice hole can come in handy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After cutting with a rocket fast Strikemaster XL3000 3 hp 10-inch for 10 years, last year I switched to an 8-inch hole. While it's easier to turn the head of a big fish up a 10-inch hole, I can pull a 25+ pound laker or pike through the circumference of the 8-inch. These are the two species I target all winter. I like the 8-inch because it's lighter, which matters to me as I get older.

If I'm on water that offers an honest chance of a 30 lb laker or pike, I can easily overlap holes with the 8 to create a double hole or a triple hole (triple looks like a three-leaf clover).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a 10" lazer and didn't mind it all, still cut faster than my buddy's 8" jiffy. I mainly went with the 10" at first because I didn't own a vexilar and did a lot of sight fishing, but since the vexilar purchase a few years ago I went and bought the 9" auger so the vexi wouldn't find it's way down the hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be a smart aleck here but a trout or pike in the high 20# range will have a girth of 25+ inches depending on the length, and an 8" hole has a 25 1/8" girth. Yes a fish that is a bit larger can be squeezed through, but that requires a gaff and hopefully the hook holds and the line doesnt break while you gaff the fish.

Not that happens frequently, but you never know......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this time last year I needed a new auger, and all that was left were 10". It works great, but I really don't need the bigger hole, and it is heavier, it may not be much, but in 20-30 years, some of you will think it is alot of weight. Also, I will have to wait longer to take my grandson fishing, right now he would slide right down the hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Sorry to hear that Duff. Will give my GSP's an extra scratch behind the ear for you guys today
    • Aw, man, sorry to hear that.  Shed some tears and remember her well.  They all take a piece of our hearts with them; some more than others.
    • yes sorry for your loss..  our dogs are always special...
    • Truly sorry to hear that duffman! I know that feeling.  Keep the good memories  
    • Chamois passed away this weekend a couple days short of her 13th bday. What a great dog to hang out with here at home and on distant adventures. Gonna miss ya big time my little big girl.
    • Sounds pretty sweet, alright. I will check them out, thanks.
    • If you really want to treat your wife (and yourself) with a remote operated trolling motor, the Minn Kota Ulterra is about easy as it gets.  Auto stow and deploy is pretty awesome.  You just have to turn the motor on when you go out and that the last time you have to touch it.   24V 80lb.  60 inch shaft is probably the right length for your boat.  They ain’t cheap - about $3k - but neither one of you would have to leave your seat to use it all day.
    • Wanderer, thanks for your reply. I do intend for it to be 24 volt, with a thrust of 70-80. Spot lock is a must (my wife is looking forward to not being the anchor person any more).  With my old boat we did quite a lot of pulling shad raps and hot n tots, using the trolling motor. Unlikely that we will fish in whitecaps, did plenty of that when I was younger. I also need a wireless remote, not going back to a foot pedal. We do a fair amount of bobber fishing. I don't think I will bother with a depth finder on the trolling motor. I am leaning toward moving my Garmin depth finder from my old boat to the new one, just because I am so used to it and it works well for me. I am 70 years old and kinda set in my ways...
    • Dang, new content and now answers.   First, congrats on the new boat!   My recommendation is to get the most thrust you can in 24V, assuming a boat that size isn’t running 36V.  80 might be tops?  I’m partial to MinnKota.     How do you plan to use the trolling motor is an important question too.     All weather or just nice weather?   Casting a lot or bait dragging?   Bobber or panfish fishing?   Spot lock?  Networked with depth finders?  What brand of depth finders?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.