Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
hunterfisher

RV LICENSE?????

22 posts in this topic

I AM NOT SURE IF THIS TOPIC HAS ALREADY BEEN COVERED BUT WHAT ARE THE RULES AND REGS FOR A 7x14 WHEELHOUSE THAT DOES NOT GET LEFT UNATTENDED. I HEAD OUT ON TO THE ICE ON A FRIDAY AND PULL IT HOME ON SUN. I THOUGHT I HEARD SOMETHING ABOUT AN RV LICENSE NEEDED?????

ANY INFO WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED

THANKS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres what I found/ was told by DMV/DNR when getting the license on my house.

If not left unattented overnight you do not need a DNR fishouse license.

In order to legally pull it down the road now you need a trailer license. If it has the ability to load a 4 wheeler into it or if it has a toilet it has to be licensed as a RV and get tabs every year. If no toilet or door for 4 wheeler you only need to get the standard lifetime trailer license. If the gross weight is 3001 lbs or more you will need to get trailer brakes on it to be legal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is left over nite un-attended you need a license. If you are not leaving it out you only need your name/ address or drivers lic. or DNR number.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much does it cost for the lifetime trailer license under 3000#?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from a state trooper: "fish houses are being classified as utility trailers. up under 3000 lbs dry, just a perm license. over 3000 lbs including a wheeler and anything else you put in there, you need brakes on it also"

I expect the troopers to beging to enforce this law, so make sure you're up to par!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is good to know being I almost had mine licensed as with plates ect. I do not have double doors or a toliet. Makes me very glad I walked out of the DMV rather than paying the $300 + they wanted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that if it has bunks so that it can be used for sleeping it also has to have RV plates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when i turned this very old camper into a fish house.the dmv said i didnt need nothin cause it was a fish house.i said okie dokie.but then i started to think hmmm its a fish house on wheels.she asked me if it had bunks i said no it has nothin but 3 benches and 6 holes in it.sh said dont worry about it then you dont need anything.i better check more into this before i remove it from lotw for the winter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be a DMV site by DMV site thing but when I was at the DMV office getting my license I told them it had bunks and they asked me if it had a toilet. I said no and they said it only needs the lifetime license unless it has a toilet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MNhunter You may have gone to the DMV before the law changed. I went to license mine 2 years ago and they said they would not license it because it was a fishhouse. Now you do need a liocense for the road if it has wheels. Some need a RV license and some need a lifetime trailer license. From what they told me in Maple grove (DMV) if it has double door to haul a atv or if it has a toilet it needs the RV license.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There supposedly is also something now about needing clearance lights over a certain size. I don't know the full extent though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn"t want to take off work to license the house we had for a few years so had a buddy do it for me. He got the life time license but they charged him sales tax on the value of the house. And NO he did not say it was only worth 50 bucks.

Have others run into this??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was worried about being charged sales tax cause mine is only 3 years old and it would have been about $400. They told me they don't charge sales tax on them unless new or a transfer of ownership. Since I was getting a first time registration on a non new trailer I didn't have to pay sales tax. I think it depends on which DMV you go to. I don't think they have it together very well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Told me as long as it is older than 3 years u dont have to pay the sales tax

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you go to five different licensing places your probably going to get five different answers as to what type of license you need and whether or not you need to pay sales tax. This whole thing is a mess because there is no regulation or state statute that spells out exactly what is required. In 2007 the DNR, DPS, and DVS realized that fish houses on wheels were not covered by the state statutes but meet the requirements of a trailer as spelled out by the statutes. Those three groups got together and decided that they should be licensed, but never really established any set regulations for the DMV to use to decide what gets licensed how. The only thing for sure is since it has been determined that they are trailers per the state statutes then they need to have the proper reflectors and lights, and if they are over 3000 pounds GVWR they need to have brakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to sign an affidavit stating my "trailer" was more than 4 years old. Thus no sales tax. If it was newer, then you need proof that you paid sales tax or they will charge you. This is all according to a deputy registrar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It continues to amaze me as to how many people are confused about this topic. I agree with retired on Osakis. I work with a large numer of ice fisherman in New Prague Mn That own wheel houses and we all have different opinions on what regs are because we all have been told different things. It appears nothing is cut and dry or black and white. How poor of a job has the DNR / State of minnesota done communicating to use what is required. It should be simple as this. Trailers 3000 LBS and greater require electric brakes. That would apply to fish houses, bob cat trailers, and RV'S. Any trailers that have a living quarters (running water with a holding tank requires a RV License. Shelters left on the ice overnight require a DNR shelter license.

All utility trailers (non RV) are required to have a trailer license. Is that easy enough??????????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Screw the state. What NEW LAW should we expect next year? Maybe a $20 fee to use a PUBLIC launch???? WAY TO GO STATE OF MN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a 6 y/old house from my boss last year and he built a new one. Mine is an 8x20 on skids which he built a "custom" roller-bed trailer for. Last year I didn't need to license, but I do this year. His new one is a 6.5x14 crankdown wheelhouse. He went to one register to license and told them it was new and they charged him $72 for lifetime. I went to the local register and they are trying to tell me I will have to pay over $100 for lifetime since it hasn't been registered before and all this other b/s. I'm thinking the whole time, no, it hasn't been registered because it didn't have to be!What gives....somebody needs to quit counting ballots and figure out how to write laws that are clear and understood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go some where else to license it and tell them it's home made. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I had the fasteners they recommended but it still needs to be filled to prevent floating . I don't recall what spacing I used but was told later I did every thing correct except for the water .
    • I bought my first house almost exactly a year ago and am looking to put it in a garden which is kind of a new adventure for me. Since I don't have the best soil in my yard, I am thinking I am going to build some raised garden beds out of some 2x12s. I am looking for some suggestions on this. Is 12" of soil deep enough? Any do's or don'ts from people that have done this before?   I've never done a solo garden before, so I am kind of in uncharted territories. I want to make some salsa and possibly pasta sauce so what all should I grow? Tomatoes and peppers are on the list... what else?   I'm located in Duluth so temp/thaw wise, we are at least a week or 2 behind the metro still.

    • I think he just got triple owned, I just scored a ton of points in my imaginary troll game. YES!!!!  
    • I am making some bluebird houses out of PVC.  They need to be white.  I have painted some with Zinser primer but it doesn't adhere very well.  Any idea what I should do to get the paint to stick?   Thanks for your time.   Tom
    • I don't think Trump can do that much damage in 4 years, if he makes it that long.
    • Phony politicians of all stripes have reversed their position on the fence numerous times, since it is just a political football that is typically dropped once the election is over.     One of the obstacles is land ownership, and we are supposedly a nation of laws that stands for the right to own property.     In 2007, as the Bush administration was extending the fence, it sent letters to property owners threatening to sue them if they did not “voluntarily” hand over their rights to their land. The letters offered no compensation for the use of the land. Some intimidated property owners signed the letters thinking that they had no recourse. Others refused, and the governmentsued them for access. Although the government can—and did—attempt to use eminent domain to seize property from landowners, the lawsuits took years to complete (7 years in one case), causing substantial delays. DHS’s Inspector General (IG) concluded in 2009 that “acquiring non-federal property has delayed the completion of fence construction,” and that “CBP achieved [its] progress primarily in areas where environmental and real estate issues did not cause significant delay.” The IG report again: For example one landowner in New Mexico refused to allow CBP to acquire his land for the fence. The land ownership predated the Roosevelt easement that provides the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way. As a result, construction of fencing was delayed and a 1.2-mile gap in the fence existed for a time in this area. CBP later acquired this land through a negotiated settlement. The IG found more than 480 cases in which the federal government negotiated the “voluntary” sale of property, and up to 300 cases in which condemnation would be sought through the courts. Because the right of just compensation is protected by the Constitution, there is little Donald Trump or Congress can do to expedite these issues. A related issue is the impact on tribal lands. Although technically owned by the federal government, tribal lands are held in trust for Indian tribes, which federal law recognizes as distinct, independent, political entities. The Tohono O’odham Nation, which has land on both sides of the border, hasalready pledged to fight the Trump administration on building a wall there. In 2007, the tribe agreed to allow the construction of a vehicle barrier on their land, but the Bush administration then waived laws that protect tribal burial grounds, and during construction, human remains were dug up. If the tribe refuses to cooperate, the Trump administration would need a stand-alone bill from Congress condemning the land. Even on federal lands, it can take months to get various agencies to agree to allow Border Patrol to move forward on various projects. In 2010, two-thirds of patrol agents-in-charge told the Government Accountability Office that under land management laws, the interagency compliance process had delayed or limited access to portions of some federal lands. Some 54 percent said that they were unable to obtain responses to requests for permission to use the lands in a timely manner. In one case, it took nearly 8 months for Border Patrol to get permission to install a single underground sensor. Only 15 percent, however, said that these issues adversely impacted the overall security in their areas.
    • Signs of life? Not sure how Dubs and the PK lets Ovi score over and over from the same spot.
    •   No argument from demorats and phoney libertarians in 2006.     Chump Shumer voted yes for a border in 2006 and again in 2010.   Q: What changes to our current immigration policy do you support? A: I support further securing our borders; prohibiting hiring of undocumented immigrants by requiring job applicants to present a secure Social Security card; creating jobs by attracting the world's best and brightest to America, and keeping them here; requiring undocumented immigrants to register with the government, pay taxes, and earn legal [status or face deportation.] Source: League of Women Voters 2010 Candidate Questionnaire , Aug 11, 2010 Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border. Within 18 months, achieves operational control over U.S. land and maritime borders, including: 1) systematic border surveillance through more effective use of personnel and technology; and 2) physical infrastructure enhancements to prevent unlawful border entry. Defines "operational control" as the prevention of all unlawful U.S. entries, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, narcotics, and other contraband. Proponents support voting YES because: It is obvious there is no more defining issue in our Nation today than stopping illegal immigration. The most basic obligation of any government is to secure the Nation's borders. One issue in which there appears to be a consensus between the Senate and the House is on the issue of building a secure fence. So rather than wait until comprehensive legislation is enacted, we should move forward on targeted legislation which is effective and meaningful. Reference: Secure Fence Act; Bill H R 6061 ; vote number 2006-262 on Sep 29, 2006 http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Charles_Schumer_Immigration.htm#2006-262      
    •   And still...   A YUUGE nothing burger..   Bigley !!
    • One billion dollars for 62 of the 1500 miles of border and that is a cheap,easy section.   Oh My
  • Our Sponsors