Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
HugoBox

No barbs and good release tools

16 posts in this topic

I know its been beaten to death, but I'll share a quick story. My brother (BoxMN) was unhooking about a 30 inch pike for me in the water and it and he ended up with the business end of a DCG in his thumb while the rest of the lure was still in the fish. The combination of pinched barbs and a Knipex made the whole thing go much easier for him and the fish.

We also landed several pike and 2 skis this weekend- all on lures with pinched barbs. I'm sold...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar experience one fall on LOTW with a Muskie. Reached over the side to carefully unhook him and he flopped and drove a hook into the side of my LH thumb and out the tip. Naturally the fish was still hooked on another set of trebles on the Jake. frown

It was a windy and rough day but fortunately we drifted into a small bay out of the wind a little and I was able to work the hooks out of the fish and free the fish.

The barbs were pinched down on all the hooks so I was able to remove the hook from yours truly pretty easily as well. Still a bloody mess.

Usually it's just me and the wife on our fall trips and we can go for days w/o seeing another boat on the lake.

I may lose a few fish because of the pinched down barbs but the additional safety factor makes it worthwhile. Heck, I've lost untold amounts of fish with barbed hooks!

Sometimes help can be a long ways away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was fishing in Hayward, and in the lake we were in we were required to use barbless hooks... its not that bad at all, just keep the line tighter, and bring the fish in, and removal is a lot easier.

later this same season

I wish i was using barbless when I hooked in to my thumb so deep that i couldn't get it out without a E.R. visit.

Now I often bend down the barbs for convienience.

moral of the story...

i lose fish either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of my lures have been neutered, except for jigs or hooks that I use with a bobber. I took the barbs off of all those originally but then realized that my live baits would wiggle off and I lost many more fish.

Has anyone found a good solution for bobber fishing without barbs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The day I go totally Barbless on Musky fishing is the day I become a astronaut.

I've "been there and done that" and I give you a 100% guarantee you "will" lose more fish.

I understand pinching them down yes,

but to go totally barbless is simply dumb!

Brian Kaiser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thankful for the pinched down barbs when I was stuck the other day smile

But I also lost two fish last week that I don't know why. Not blaming the pinched barbs, as big fish get off, and that is how they stay big, ha! So not sure, but I know that they can be caught for sure with pinched barbs successfully, and the hook removal, be it from a fish or person, is much easier... and I am lazy, so I like easy things wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"keep the line tighter, and just bring the fish in" may sound easy and work well on smaller fish, but it doesn't always go exactly according to plan when a big 50+ is shaking his head out of the water or jumping 5 feet out of the water or whatever else they want to do...

For me personally, the barbs are staying on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think keeping barbs on and making sure to have some good hook cutters is the best way to go about it. For as much time as we spend chasing you want to put yourself in a high percentage situation to keep the fish hooked and with barbs that is the best that can be done. Sure I've lost quite a few even with barbs but I would rather be with the percentages. I applaud you guys for going to that length. If it's all about doing it for removal I think cutting the hooks works good. Although unfortunately little pieces of hooks are going into the lake most likely, I'm sure at some point if everyone does this someone will say your littering?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Although unfortunately little pieces of hooks are going into the lake most likely, I'm sure at some point if everyone does this someone will say your littering?

If some say so, well theres a bunch of things on the bottom of the lake..sunglasses, tackleboxes, cans, hooks, crankbaits etcetc. and 99.99% people probably dont give effort to remove it so theyre littering too? blush

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya -

After fishing several years with mashed down barbs, I'm pretty convinced it doesn't make a big difference in the number of fish a lose. I lost some before, and I lose some now. I think I can argue that it's probably a wash because I get better hook penetration without a big barb. It sure makes unhooking them easier, that I know for sure.

One caveat in my case is I use longer, softer rods than I think most guys tend to use. I haven't used a traditional 'pool cue' rod in many, many years, and a lot of my custom rods are on what would by most people's standards be heavy bass blanks and salmon rods or at best medium power muskie rods. I think that has a lot to do with losing fewer fish - barbless or not.

Cheers,

Rob Kimm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, the two I lost last week were on pool cue rods, but lately I have been using a long Fig Rig rod with a Curado 300, and I haven't missed a pike, but also haven't had a ski strike it yet... But the cool thing is that I (not as avid a musky guy like you all) can cast it more like a heavy bass setup, and I am not complaining to my brother about being sick of casting the heavy stuff as much smile I know my brother landed his last two on very long rod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also a bit surprised at all the people who seem to put hooks into there hands and fingers.

I have been fishing for over 35 years, fishing muskies for 16 Guiding for 8 and I have "never put a Hook in my hand"

(atleast not past the barb anyway)

I get the ole RASBERIES on the back of my hands from the big musky gills...and yes I Bleed up a storm for a few seconds but knock on wood I have not ever had a 5/0 Hook in me....nor do I ever want to!

Hope I didn't just Jinx myself?

Brian K

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think RK is onto something with the long rod deal. The last two I landed were on a really long stick and it seemed to go much better than on the shorties. Also, based on how the fish were hooked (right in the jaw) they would have had to jump a bunch to get off. I still may lose more but I don't do it for a living so I can live with that.

Also, the reason BoxMN ended up with a hook in the thumb is that his lazy brother told him to unhook a pike in the water instead of holding it for him. Those DCG's sure flop in the breeze when a gator does the death roll!!! Oh well, I guess he owes me one...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MuskyMan - your forgetting about the usage of my good friend alcohol. Granted, a slippery northern that wiggles backwards out of your grip can surely hook a hand. I've seen it happen twice. Although alcohol might play a part of it too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm too concerned with the fish's welfare. Besides using lures with pinched down barbs, I don't like taking small Muskies into the boat or netting them. Less handling the better.

The pinched down barbs sure make unhooking the fish boatside so much easier.

I've managed to put hooks in my hands 2x over the years. The first was reaching into a net for a small Muskie. The little guy swung his head and put the other treble of the Rap J-13 into the palm of my hand. Cut the hooks out of the fish, dumped him over the side and drove over to my brother's boat to pop out the hook. These were standard barbed hooks. Fortunately, the "pop out" method worked like a charm.

The other was the above described incident.

Ordinarily I use the old Baker hookouts, a pair of needlenose pliers or the like to pull hooks and keep my hands clear. There are times though when I can't back the hooks out, even with the pinched barbs, and I have slip my free hand up under the gill plate to get better control and have something to work against, like when there's hooks in both the top and bottom jaw.

Seems like the little fish are more dangerous as they shake their heads more violently boatside.

Or maybe I'm just a klutz, I dunno. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Yep.  We all will.  I already said that.
    • Holy cats!   I mean bullies!
    • Not looking good for The Donald.
    • Yes, good times! There is adventure to be had but it has to be looked for.  Just getting to know the area has been one adventure and now the second one is finding out who plays where when the playing actually starts.    I could've used one of these on Saturday.
    • Trump and Clinton are 'tied' in Minnesota, says poll that's wrong Tuesday, September 27, 2016 by Mike Mullen in News Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are TIED in Minnesota! Can you believe it? Don't!NBC News Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump debated Monday night.    Tuesday morning's conventional wisdom says the debate was long on losers -- Lester Holt, Chicago, the truth -- and produced only one winner: Barron Trump, 10, who is reputed to be "so good with these computers, it's unbelievable."  Ignore the spin. Let's pay closer attention to something tangible, something real. Like this tangible, really bad poll paid for by Breitbart News and believed by no one. Trump and Clinton are in a dead heat in Minnesota, tied 43 percent to 43 percent, according to an "EXCLUSIVE" poll conducted this past weekend. Simultaneous polls in Pennsylvania and North Carolina found Trump tightening on Clinton's leads, with her tiny advantages in both states falling inside the margin of error.  "Minnesota is the perfect example" of Trump's nationwide surge, says pollster Pat Cadell, the spooky-looking punditFox News often wheels out after applying shoe polish to his head. Cadell continued: “Minnesota has been a close state in past elections, even though the Democrats always seem to win it, it was close in 2000 and 2004." This would be a good point. If it weren't a bad point. Those old elections reveal that Democratic candidates, even lame ones, tend to overperform their national average in Minnesota. In 2000, George W. Bush lost the national popular vote, 47.9 percent to Al Gore's 48.4; in Minnesota, Bush got 45.5 percent to Gore's 47.9 percent. (More than 5 percent of Minnesotans voted Ralph Nader.) In 2004, John Kerry won Minnesota with 51 percent to Bush's 47.6. Nationwide, Bush won by 50.7 percent to Kerry's 48.3 percent. Point is: If a Republican managed to win Minnesota, it won't matter, because he'll have won the rest of the country in a landslide.    Here are some fun stories about Gravis Marketing, the polling company that inked an exclusive -- "EXCLUSIVE" -- deal to do Breitbart's polling this campaign season. It seems Gravis has a history of shading results just a liiiiitlebit in favor of flamboyant, Tea Party-style outsiders challenging inside-the-Beltway incumbents. (Scenario sound familiar?) In Kentucky, Gravis had GOP U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell at 48 percent, and his wacky Republican primary opponent at 34 percent; McConnell won 60 percent to 35 percent. In Texas, GOP U.S. Sen. John Cornyn had a 43-28 lead over a fringe-right candidate, whom Gravis described as "gaining." Cornyn won 59-19.  Those blown calls had Slate calling Gravis "the worst poll in America." It gets worse. This year, in Maryland, Gravis conducted a Congressional poll for yet another conservative outsider, and found the right-wing challenger winning 58 percent to the incumbent's 29 percent; in fact, the incumbent won, 78 percent to 11 percent, a difference of 96 percent from what Gravis had.  Probably, Hillary's ahead of Trump by something by something like the results in a recent Star Tribune poll (44 percent to 38 percent) or this week's Survey USA/KSTP results (Clinton 46 percent, Trump 39).  But if Gravis is as wrong as they've been in the past... maybe Clinton's ahead 75-25. Or 92-8! 95-25? Trying to adjust for numbers collected by the wiz kids at Gravis for the mouthbreathers at Breitbart is virtually impossible. Not the sort of math you can do in your head. Quickly, Barron! To the computer!
    • Which side of the rope are you asking about??? The one end is a surgeons loop(with the magnet). The other is just the way I learned as a kid in scouts to quickly secure a rope so that it didn't get tangled up and could quickly be redeployed. Loop it several times to take up the slack. Then wrap the tag end around several times and pass the last few inches back under itself. Pull it snug. When you need to use it just pull the tag end free and unwrap. Don't know that it has a name.?.?.?
    • Free Hillary blackberries?
    • Nope. Dave nailed it
    • Yeah boy, you derned near got em.
  • Our Sponsors