Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Boss Hogg

Walleye Stamp?

141 posts in this topic

Has anybody heard of a possible Walleye Stamp?? Two different people told me this, and I don't know if they are trying to joke with me or not. However, it would not surprise me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They will be an optional purchase to help stock more lakes with walleye's. I will be out next year. I have heard alot of people _______ about it. I don't think it's a bad idea, as long as it going to put more fish in the water for me to catch. Maybe the fishing gods will be happier with you and you have better success, but anyways it's just 5 dollars and not required to purchase it more like a donation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd buy it... Just like the sturgeon tag that I will never use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read in the local paper that it is 5 bucks and it is Optional. It will be available for next season. The proceeds are supposed to go for stocking efforts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will gladly pay it, even if it was $10. Anything to help out the stocking efforts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read in the local paper that it is 5 bucks and it is Optional. It will be available for next season. The proceeds are supposed to go for stocking efforts.

Not to go off on a rant, but isn't that what our licenses are supposed to be paying for now. When is this state going to learn how to budget instead of coming after us for more money? mad I think it would be rediculous if you ever had to pay for a walleye stamp. Why don't they just make you buy a pike, muskie, cat, perch, sunfish, crappie, etc stamp for each and every species you want to catch. Give me a break already. I'm not saying I won't purchase it to keep up the stocking, but enough with this backwards state and all their dang fees.

I'm done now and going upstairs to get a soda. Who do I pay a fee to or where do I get a stamp to drink that? cool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to go off on a rant, but isn't that what our licenses are supposed to be paying for now?

Yes

When is this state going to learn how to budget instead of coming after us for more money? mad

It was one legislator that crafted this money grab, not the DNR

I think it would be rediculous if you ever had to pay for a walleye stamp.

I agree

Why don't they just make you buy a pike, muskie, cat, perch, sunfish, crappie, etc stamp for each and every species you want to catch. Give me a break already. I'm not saying I won't purchase it to keep up the stocking, but enough with this backwards state and all their dang fees.

This stamp isn't needed. If the DNR stopped stocking walleyes in poor locations they could use that allotment for the lakes where walleye stocking does work.

I'm done now and going upstairs to get a soda. Who do I pay a fee to or where do I get a stamp to drink that? cool

As long as there's no beer stamp we're good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would pay it to help the stocking efforts, it will either be in this form or an increase in license's. As far as having to pay for everything there is an easy solution how about we have to have a stamp for everything like for hunting for instance (small game, furbearer, deer, pheasant, waterfowl, ect...) maybe it will keep some and then maybe the ones that don't want to pay to play can go home and play tiddly winks and whine about something else......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Walleye are stocked more than all other species of fish combined. Is it really fair to the bass fisherman to have a good chunk of his license cost go to a species a fish he/she doesn't fish for? Stocking is expensive, it probably costs the DNR close to that $5 per stocked fish that survives to adulthood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
it probably costs the DNR close to that $5 per stocked fish that survives to adulthood.

How did you come up with this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
it probably costs the DNR close to that $5 per stocked fish that survives to adulthood.
How did you come up with this?

I know it costs me way more than $5 to catch each one. Just makes sense that it costs the govt. that much to put it there in the first place... grin LB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
it probably costs the DNR close to that $5 per stocked fish that survives to adulthood.

How did you come up with this?

Something I read from the Wisconsin DNR where it costs between $2.50 and $3.00 per muskie fingerling. Walleye fingerling are cheaper but fewer survive (less than 1 in 10 survive on many lakes). Sure I'm estimating but I don't think I'm too far off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I read in a walleye book that it's a 1 in a million chance for a walleye to make it to 8 lbs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe the $5 should just be mandatory to fish walleye and in return we get a STATE regulated slot limit daily/possesion limit to help manage it also, one that each lake wouldn't have to have it's own

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this rate maybe we should just handle walleyes like deer and have everyone buy a $5 tag for each fish they catch. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe the $5 should just be mandatory to fish walleye and in return we get a STATE regulated slot limit daily/possesion limit to help manage it also, one that each lake wouldn't have to have it's own

That would be nice wouldn't it? I changed my mind. I'm all for it if I can use two lines. grin

Oh now he ditnt!!! mad

Oh yes he did!! whistle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: BigWadeS
maybe the $5 should just be mandatory to fish walleye and in return we get a STATE regulated slot limit daily/possesion limit to help manage it also, one that each lake wouldn't have to have it's own

That would be nice wouldn't it? I changed my mind. I'm all for it if I can use two lines. grin

Oh now he ditnt!!! mad

Oh yes he did!! whistle

Go ahead use 2 just pay double then.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Sandmannd
Originally Posted By: BigWadeS
maybe the $5 should just be mandatory to fish walleye and in return we get a STATE regulated slot limit daily/possesion limit to help manage it also, one that each lake wouldn't have to have it's own

That would be nice wouldn't it? I changed my mind. I'm all for it if I can use two lines. grin

Oh now he ditnt!!! mad

Oh yes he did!! whistle

Go ahead use 2 just pay double then.....

I'll just keep my walleye fishin' to the croix like normal. eek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so you think it won't apply to border waters then? so lets say this is just for in-land lakes and waterways, if it doesn't apply to border waters, don't bring up the whole state as you put it in your argument when you are looking out for your most common waters....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stamp might, but I can at least use to dang rods out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stamp might, but I can at least use to dang rods out there.

So just so I have this right, you will pay more to keep stocking but use 2 rods to hurt the resource, talk about a hiporcritcal statement.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Sandmannd
The stamp might, but I can at least use to dang rods out there.

So just so I have this right, you will pay more to keep stocking but use 2 rods to hurt the resource, talk about a hiporcritcal statement.....

That's it, next time you're in my boat you only get to use a barbie pole!!!! laugh

Goofball. Is that why everytime (which is not very often) you catch a fish you stand up and scream "Get in my Belly!!!!" laugh "I want some fishy back, fishy back, fishy back ribs" cool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's fine I'll use Maddison's barbie pole, probably have better luck on that dang thing anyway and you know I only get that excited about eating my catch if it's a sheephead.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey smartguy, at least I bring bait and snacks, so as long as I'm bringing that stuff I think I am gonna pick up a sponge bob pole too for my 2nd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We can only hope to catch a bigger party crappie than him! 
    •   I never followed the Farve story, so don't know the details.  If I had to guess, it would be similar to Rush's.. Rush's story was more interesting to me because he is such a complete hypocrite on the issue.   Arizona hasn't legalized weed, but they are taking on the prescription drug problem, which is the root of the hard drug problem.  (You know, the part you and the feds refuse to acknowledge.)  I suggest you view the "RX to Addiction" video I posted earlier, and the link above to see what steps they are taking.    The feds actually act as an enabler for hard drug addiction.   If you have done your homework at all, you should know this.     Pointing out the double standard for enforcement of drug laws is part of the answer, which again, you refuse to acknowledge.          
    • How come you aren't talking about Bret Farve? Same as Rush, didn't go to jail either.   Are you aware of any cases of people going to jail for this behavior?   They don't seem to make the news.     AZ way behind, several states already have legalized recreational weed.   It is coming nation wide.     For me, the real question is what are sometimes called "hard drugs".   Heroin, Cocaine, Meth being the big three with a whole bunch of others like fetanyl etc.    Making them legal and sold otc like recreational marijuana seems to me like it would be a bad idea, although there are folks that seem to think otherwise.   And they are part of the "war on drugs"     So, I keep asking the folks here who are saying "end the war on drugs" what that means.     So far, not much for concrete answers.   Fingerpointing at affluent pill addicts that get treatment, or those that die, is not an answer.     

    • Of course they are Nick, that is what they do. The sad part is you only think one party is capable of this, your not nearly as dense as JV so you should be picking up on these things by now. Just because one party is less evil in your eyes doesn't mean you shouldn't see through their negative contributions to this country.

    • Hardly, I'm advocating we had the worst two choices in the history of America that I am aware of. Well done two party system, you make yourself less relevant by the day.

    • Ha ya I didn't realize he was that bad. I haven't heard anything relating to protecting players at the trade deadline CM so hopefully that is bunk. I suspect Chuck waits until the prices come down and picks up someone for cheap that will be just a filler, these guys are going for pretty high prices right now.

    • Isn't this up your ally Del? He probably has some success but it would depend on the "patient". Many people have probably healed themselves through the placebo of religious beliefs. If it works it works, who am I to argue if they are getting results but I will admit I doubt anything works across the board for everyone, we already proved that with modern medicine. 
    •       But Trump is going to make America Great Again, so he should be more open with his press briefings, even if it means some of the reporters aren't always friendly.      
  • Our Sponsors