Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Tom7227

Bottoming out

7 posts in this topic

I've been hauling some rock and I was wondering what it takes to bottom out a 2002 F150 2WD. The truck has 104,000 on it and I've never replaced the shocks. It bottomed out on the first load and so I backed off on what I put in it. Didn't seem to do any damage, but my arms are about 2 inches longer. Anyone have any idea how much it would hold?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1000lbs tops I would think. Tongue weight for a trailer would be about 500lbs so I would double that for your truck load.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

depends on what exact model it is.

[Note from admin: Please read forum policy before posting again. Thank you.]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a f150 2000 and i can haul easly over 1500 pounds and also it will tow with no problem 6000=lbs i have haul from st.cloud the lake of the woods and could have put more on it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New shocks won't affect the load capacity, the weight is on the springs. Shocks dampen the bouncing only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shizzy. My model said 2060 lbs was the max load. So would it be fair to say that you'd have to go beyond that to bottom out? Only real reason I ask is that I hauled 11 loads and I'm curious to know how much rock I've picked up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fair to say if the vehicle is not moving. You can be under the max load and bottom out on a rough road.

It's better to distribute more of the weight to the front of the truck bed. That will spread the load between front and back springs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • which models of striker bibs/ coat?
    • That little doe is a sweetheart. Reminds me why I gave up hunting. But I did it for more than six decades from MN to MT to AK and Canada. Before somebody jumps in with a snide  comment, I don't care if YOU do it but it is just not for me any more. Carry on. Nice pix....couple nice looking bucks.
    • I fish for monster bass too. But yeah, when one is the master of walleyes one tends to be an elitist... 
    • I agree; stay away from the extended warranty.  If my dealership (Village Chevrolet) won't honor the original warranty, what makes you think they will honor an extended warranty?  This problem was discovered well before my warranty ran out and they still treated me like an ugly sister...
    • Knock yourself out. IMO, pro basketball is a terrible sport.         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           Here's what they think of the Gophers in Iowa.....    
    • Wait till they lose the game.....  
    • You two must be elitist walleye guys. 
    • I can't say I'm much in agreement with Gary Johnson on this issue and I can admit it. I will say however that it makes more sense than the deal Pence struck with Carrier.   1. The carrier deal handed away state money while still being a net LOSS of jobs in that state. Johnson's program enticed new business into his state and resulted in a net GAIN of jobs and probably tourism dollars as well.  2. I think these types of deals should be handled as locally as possible. It's called representative government. Maybe it makes sense in the New Mexico deal that it be handled at the state level since it probably effects the state as a whole at least to some degree but I don't know. The Indiana deal should have been handled locally, especially if any of the tax cuts promised were property taxes. Those benefit communities at a more local level and the jobs saved benefit communities at a more local level. The state government possibly should not be handling these things but the Federal Government most assuredly should not be involved in these deals.  3. I'm pretty sure that the threat of interference with federal contracts had much more to do with the Carrier deal anyway so why did they give Carrier any tax breaks? I thought Trump was a tough guy and a strong armer? In the New Mexico deal, tax cuts are about the only leverage someone would have to bring that extra revenue and jobs into the state.   I'll say it again, I'm really not in favor of the government picking winners and losers. I do think the Pence deal is something that happens every day but the only difference is it happens at a local level and you don't have a blow hard President-elect taking credit for it normally. Time will tell whether it was a good deal or if the rest of the manufacturing community will hold the Government for ransom now like every professional sports franchise does these days.    Gary Johnson is in favor of replacing the current Tax code with a 'Fair Tax" system.
    • I think Purple means, our BullHeads!
  • Our Sponsors