Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tsewdim

Gar on topwater?

23 posts in this topic

Caught my first ever gar on topwater while fishing for bass on a backwater area of the St Croix. Pretty cool looking things although they don't fight very hard. Gotta admit though, I was too scared to touch it even though I know they are harmless. I shook it off then caught another one a while later again on topwater. I was using a zara spook.

Do they bite on topwater often?

Caught a dogfish a few years ago too. I also didn't touch it. LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

do you know what kind of gar? long nose or shortnose?

longnose gar have to surface every 15 or so minutes during the summer, so they will hunt that area as well. rope lures are the most effective way to fish them, i have a couple rope lures made especially for topwater. one is a large cork popper and 2 rope tails. (like the spro frogs) another is just a normal rope lure, with a heavy rubber cap on the front of the lure. the air between the rubber makes the lure float enough. but i made another i added high density foam for even higher floatation. my theory on this is that i will skip it across the surface on the retrieve, to imitate a panicing baitfish.

as with buffalo, i have neve caught a gar before, but i have done my research laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess would be shortnose simply because there are many more of them(from what I have seen) than longnose in MN. Then again, we'll never know without a description.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess would be shortnose simply because there are many more of them(from what I have seen) than longnose in MN. Then again, we'll never know without a description.

im not sure about that...

but likely a shortnose. its almost impossible to hook a long nose without letting it swallow the bait

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say almost impossible but difficult.

Yeah just make a rope lure I made one and it took a few minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I catch them just reeling in a shad rap reeling real slow. They are hard to hook though nothing but bones in the mouth. I have tried rope lure with not as much success

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what kind of gar it was. It was between 25-30 inches long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Longnose Gar491893879_f55100ee6e.jpg

Shortnose Gar [img:center]gar-1-1-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the best luck keeping them hooked, when I use a six inch piece of wool hair ribbon on th front treble of a floating Rapala.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say almost impossible but difficult.

Yeah just make a rope lure I made one and it took a few minutes.

no not impossible. but very difficult

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I catch them just reeling in a shad rap reeling real slow. They are hard to hook though nothing but bones in the mouth. I have tried rope lure with not as much success

you have to fish ropelures right for them to work. they mainly only work for longnose. they are nowhere near as effective for shortnose cuz their mouth is more broad.

if they are longnose, you arent fishing the rope lures right.

there are alot of ways to fish them, at least a few ways for each type of rope lures. topwater, weightless, weighted. i have made a few with colorado blades on the leaders. so it is like a regular inline spinner. i caught a few pike with it while trying for gar on rose lake. had a few follows from gar. but they never hit. but the pike loved it! it was pretty cool catching a few pike with no hook.

you have to "set the hook" right with rope lures. when the fish hits. you give it a little slack, then just let that gar pull the line tight. when its tight, HOLD on. it will shake its head, and entagle the rope in its mouth. NOW you can start fighting the fish.

you NEVER actually jerk back to "set the hook"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are willing to take the effort to fillet them. (tin snips required eek ) Gar is some of the best freashwater fish you will ever eat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are willing to take the effort to fillet them. (tin snips required eek ) Gar is some of the best freashwater fish you will ever eat.

I'll have to take your word on that.

smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are willing to take the effort to fillet them. (tin snips required eek ) Gar is some of the best freashwater fish you will ever eat.

i have heard the same. there is a how to on another site that i could copy. it does a very good job explaining how to fillet gar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard of anyone eating a gar. They look like they would be all bones

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard of anyone eating a gar. They look like they would be all bones

oh no. not at all. from what i heard, the gar are so good they are almost better than salmon. i dont eat fish, and even if i did i wouldnt really go through the trouble to clean a gar just for one or 2 meals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carpmanjake...All you do is tell other people off. When in reality you are just a know-it-all. Let people state their opinions for once. Im so sick of reading your bull****! Every single thread you have to add your two sense...its all garbage. You are a young kid...how about listen to other people once before jumping in on everything and claiming you know EVERYTHING! Let people teach you rather than trying to be the teacher about everything. BTW stop extending your arm in your pictures to make fish look bigger. That bass isnt even close to 5 lbs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. a little ruff there CC. He may be young but he also fish's alot, and by alot i mean a ton! Anyway pretty sure a forum is set up to get everyone's opinion(including there 2cents) so lets be respectful of everyones opinion and not try to stir the pot. From what i have heard also is that if you want to spend the time cleaning a Gar it does actually taste pretty good!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy ChannelChaser. There's no reason to get nasty on anyone here. I enjoy reading CarmanJake's threads and appreciate that even though he's young, the guy get's out ALL THE TIME and you can't replicate experience on the water. If your fishing that much, I think it's easy to say you will learn more than the guy who sits at home on the computer complaining on some forum. I'd give gar a shot if it was put in front of me but there is no way I'm going to fillet it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason it says my screen name kittycatcher16 saying that nasty stuff about jake...It wasnt me who said that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest he did kind of insult the guy by telling him he was fishing completely wrong, before I read kittycatcher's post I was a little put off by what he said as well. Clearly not as much as kittychaser 2 though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • i've never done the plastic thing. but i've taken Reb's advice on planting grass, in particular filling in spots and its turned out great. so this is going to really hurt to say this, but Reb really knows what he's talking about when it comes to his lawn. i've also seen pictures.
    •   Right next to the river, no less.  Isn't anyone from the EPA concerned about this?    
    • The "if you were watching the story" was referring to the actions of VW.   Your link about mercedes was full of weasel words and little actual hard information.     And from the link you posted...   Seems like no evidence they did anything wrong has surfaced yet.   Maybe, maybe not.   So, what facts are you referring to?   And are you disputing the stuff about BMW and VW as well?     Oh, and from wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal    
    • Repairs and fixes for 2.0-liter Volkswagen and Audi TDI models:   There are three generations of the 2.0-liter turbo-diesel four-cylinder, and all will require different fixes (from simple software updates to complete, and potentially performance-crippling, hardware retrofits). As of January 6, 2017, Volkswagen announced a complete fix for 2015 TDI models with the third-generation engine. This will involve installing a second NOx sensor and a new or replacement diesel-oxidation catalyst. In March 2017, VW received approval to sell these cars, of which there are approximately 12,000 new and 67,000 used. On May 19, 2017, VW received approval to repair 2012–2014 Passat TDI models. A total of 84,391 cars are included, except those with manual transmissions; CARB said VW had not shown sufficient evidence that they will be made compliant. VW is awaiting approval to resell these vehicles as used cars. Buybacks and compensation for 3.0-liter Volkswagen and Audi TDI and Porsche diesel models:

      As of December 21, 2016, Volkswagen reached a second settlement with the roughly 78,000 owners and lessees of 3.0-liter diesel models. In late January 2017, Volkswagen announced a $1.2 billion program that differs substantially from the $10 billion program for 2.0-liter diesel models. Judge Breyer approved the final settlement amount on May 11, 2017. Currently, only owners of 2009–2012 Audi Q7 and Volkswagen Touareg models with the Generation 1 engine are eligible for buybacks between $24,755 to $57,157. This is because Volkswagen cannot repair them to be emissions compliant. Generation 1 lessees of 2012 vehicles can receive between $5001 and $6615 for terminating their leases early. Generation 1 owners who do not sell their cars back to Volkswagen can receive $7755 to $13,880. For complete details, see the court’s handy executive summary. For Generation 2 models between 2013–2016, Volkswagen will offer cash compensation ranging from $7039 to $16,114; if the recall isn’t made “timely available,” the automaker will buy them back for prices between $43,153 to $99,862 and extend any warranties that might expire until the recall is ready. Generation 2 lessees can receive between $5677 and $12,492 for terminating their leases early. If lessees decide to keep their cars and perform the fix, they each receive a flat $2000. In all cases with Generation 2 cars, owners and lessees can opt to receive half of the cash payments up front and the other half once the vehicle is repaired. Generation 2 owners and lessees are also eligible to receive up to $1500 each as part of a separate $327.5 million settlement with Bosch, the supplier of the emissions software. Details are available here. These prices have been set using NADA Used Car Guide Clean Retail values as of November 2015 and adjusted for options, mileage, and the region the vehicle was registered in as of that month. The 2016 diesel models will be repurchased at 12.9 percent above prices for equivalent 2015 models. Owners and lessees will also be reimbursed for state and local taxes. The registration deadline is December 31, 2019. Owners and lessees will get the same payment (adjusted for mileage) regardless of when they register. Repairs and fixes for 3.0-liter Volkswagen and Audi TDI and Porsche diesel models:   There are two versions of the 3.0-liter turbo-diesel V-6 that require different modifications. The Generation 1 engines in the 2009–2012 Audi Q7 and Volkswagen Touareg cannot be made fully compliant with EPA regulations. Generation 2 engines in 2013–2016 models can be fixed under a formal recall that must be approved by the EPA and CARB no later than December 20, 2017, or else Volkswagen must pay owners an additional penalty. On those 58,000 models, Audi said on November 23, 2015, that it would update the software and “resubmit” its emissions applications after the EPA found undocumented “auxiliary emission control devices” that were allowing excessive levels of NOx.
    • I would guess it is going to create more pollution rounding up, transporting, scrapping and reclaiming those cars than the excess they would have emitted in their lifespan vs the cars that replace them. 
    • So, first you tell me " if you were watching the story closely" then when I posted a link supporting what I said to be fact, your response was that your memory is bad and you were making a hypothesis. Classic. 
    • they will all probably end up scrapped then. you can probably expect the junkyards to soon be filled with Volkswagens that will be missing the ECU, DPF, and have holes in their engines.   cash for clunkers 2.0?
    •     This is very earth friendly, and good tree huggers and bureaucrats everywhere love it...
    • I would like to get some recipes to inject a turkey breast, and appx. how long does it take to smoke it? And whats a good wood to use ?
    • Could be that others cheated also.   I was relying on memory about the BMW connection and hypothesized that Mercedes would also have been a possibility.   I did say "maybe mercedes".     In any case, VW cheated on emissions for many years with the assent of the highest levels of management.     Apparently making a small diesel that runs ok and doesn't make too much pollution at an acceptable cost is really hard.
  • Our Sponsors