croixeyes Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Just read on the NFL sports network ticker Green just signed with the Houston Texans.Do the Pack have someone else to run the ball for them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outdoor ran Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Good question? Can't believe they got rid of Green, Godo, and Davenport in the last year. That leaves Morency-sp I guess. Some people have the Pack taking a RB with there fisrt pick. Have to wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegills1512 Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Technically Ran, the pack didn't get rid of Green, he was a UFA (Unstricted Free Agent) so he could talk to any team he wished to play for or whatever team was offereing him the best contract. I am suprised that the Packers didn't put the franchise tag on him to keep him in Green Bay. But then there could be conflict between the player and the organization just like in Chicago right now with LB Lance Briggs and the Bears organization. Sounds like Briggs is one [PoorWordUsage]ed of guy right now with the Bears placing the franchise tag on him to keep him in Chicago, but he wants to play elsewhere it sounds, so he is asking for a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outdoor ran Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 bluegills, getting rid of him by not giving him a new contract- same thing. He's pretty worn down anyway. I think it was the right move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Quote:Technically Ran, the pack didn't get rid of Green, he was a UFA (Unstricted Free Agent) so he could talk to any team he wished to play for or whatever team was offereing him the best contract. I am suprised that the Packers didn't put the franchise tag on him to keep him in Green Bay. But then there could be conflict between the player and the organization just like in Chicago right now with LB Lance Briggs and the Bears organization. Sounds like Briggs is one [PoorWordUsage]ed of guy right now with the Bears placing the franchise tag on him to keep him in Chicago, but he wants to play elsewhere it sounds, so he is asking for a trade. If the Pack would have franchised him and didn't get a long term deal worked out he would have been guarenteed 6.99 million next year. WAY TOO MUCH for a 30 year old back who isn't what he used to be. Also, he was looking for a 4 year deal and the Packers didn't want to go that far out. We are very thin at RB right now, but I think we will take care of that in the draft, free agency, or maybe even a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green&Gold Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Yup, a great player who loved being a Packer, never complained, went about business quietly and got the job done. No doubt he will be in the Packer's HOF. That said, the organization probably made the right move, or non-move, as it were. It just wouldn't have been smart to re-sign him to a multi-year deal in the range of what he was looking for. He is getting up there, and this, combined with his repaired quad and asthma, prevented him from lining up for more than 2 snaps in a row. Good luck Ahman, and I hope you prove the Packers wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnwild Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 I can maybe see them signing Jamal Lewis if the price is cheap enough or maybe even Travis Henry which would be more of an ideal back for the Packers offense, can catch out of the backfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down to Earth Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Quote:I can maybe see them signing Jamal Lewis if the price is cheap enough or maybe even Travis Henry which would be more of an ideal back for the Packers offense, can catch out of the backfield. Henry has signed with Denver, so that option is no longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
united jigsticker Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 I guess when you fumble the ball alot, you don't complain about still getting carries. One year it was his elbow pads. Then he changed them, fumbles stopped. Then it was his elbow pads the next year. He forgot I guess. Then it was hayfever the next season. He took some Clariton and the ball stuck in his arms better because he wasn't wiping snot off his face. Last season he didn't fumble because Brett Favre asked him not to. That guy's pretty influential. Maybe he should ask himself to not throw the ball on a rainbow and watch it get picked off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genegodawa Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Ok now, UJ....not a Favre fan are you?This just in: Favre has asked that UJ not post any negative comments about him (and since he is so influential......)Nyuk, nyuk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
united jigsticker Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 No, actually, I like Favre. And his bullet passes (though I would NOT wanna be at the other end of one)I am also happy he is coming back for another season. I actually like that he's not afraid to throw the ball up for grabs, makes for entertaining football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookincalifornia Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 i keep hearing marshawn lynch is gonna be a packer. possible cal backfield reunion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts