Jump to content

  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Tavaris Jackson to Seahawks?

goblueM

By goblueM
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

PierBridge Grand Master

PierBridge

Posted
Posted

No body is saying T-Jack was, is, will ever be any good. We were pointing out how he was playing better recently "He was" and it has or had to be encouraging considering how bad a football team Seattle is...

What we have been saying is a lot of you and we get the frustration, were saying the only reason T-Jack is/was in the league is because of Chili. Well you were wrong on that and a few other things like "he wouldn't start on a high school team" "His career is over once Chili is fired" "He'll never work in the NFL or CFL again" "Doubtful he'll be a back-up" among many other incorrect comments.

B.Amish is my point man on this topic from here on out~ grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born2Fish Mentor

Born2Fish

Posted
Posted

Too much discussion about such a horrible player. How many teams lined up for the services of T Jack this past off season? Here I will quickly do the math for you....1. Who happens to be the offensive coordinator on that team? Oh the same one who was with T Jack throughout his great career. Sounds like a match made in heaven. Now quickly, who is the leading receiver in Seattle? Doug Baldwin. Who is that you may ask? The guy who has 5 more receptions than their #1 wideout Sidney Rice. Another one...What is T Jacks career passer rating? 77.5. Yep this discussion is certainly about a great QB primed to lead his team to....nowhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
B. Amish Veteran

B. Amish

Posted
Posted

so which way should we take this circus next?

Quote:
jackson's rating is higher this year than mcnabb, matt ryan, flacco, cutler, kolb, orton, freeman, sanchez and bradford.

the rating suggests that jackson is playing better than the rest of this gang. but, i bet each and every one of you would take about 8 out of 9 of the guys listed above as your qb before jackson.

so, what all this means is either:

a) qb rating is a poor way to compare qb's

B) jackson is better than the rest of those guys

c) the most popular man on the message board is the backup qb

d) it means nothing, having a good team and a good qb go hand in hand

e) jackson is my brother in law and i wish him the best

f) fire chilly!

g) all of the above

Link to comment
Share on other sites
james_walleye Grand Master

james_walleye

Posted
Posted

How many of these guys have lead teams to playoff victories and/or conference championship games. Your right I would take almost all of them because of this. I wouldn't take junkson over flacco because his rating through 5 games is higher. We have seen enough out of junkson and the guys listed to make obvious decisions. All the qbs listed have gotten off to poor starts and its not shocking that junksons stats are better to this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PierBridge Grand Master

PierBridge

Posted
Posted

Quote:
Here I will quickly do the math for you....1.

100 percent incorrect.

Which is better than James or Fishguru who are batting about 50 percent in this one. Some good points but some vastly over exaggerated and factually incorrect statements~

But we get the drift...

smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites
james_walleye Grand Master

james_walleye

Posted
Posted

Feel free to point out anything overexaggerated or factually incorrect. I can't help that even with t jack gone to Seattle that you can't let go of a mancrush on a qb who

is a lower level starting qb at best. Having him on the field is a perfect way to make sure your team will be mediocre at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
james_walleye Grand Master

james_walleye

Posted
Posted

Hmmmm, rumblings that the seahawks might be interested in obtaining Carson palmer. Wonder why when junkson has looked so "good". They must think junkson looks pretty promising. Lol 5 games in and they have already figured out junkson isn't the answer. Overexaggerating Haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PierBridge Grand Master

PierBridge

Posted
Posted

Keep twisting what I've been saying and back peddling from your documented and quoted comments the last 4 years all you want.

Never said he was great or even good, quite the contrary actually. I just pointed out the obvious and your flawed delusional forecast for T-Moneys career once he left the Vikings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
james_walleye Grand Master

james_walleye

Posted
Posted

For 4 years the junkson doubters have been "money". Let's be real, any delusion going on seems to be coming from the very, very few who seem to think he's going to amount to anything more than what we have seen. To this point he has not shown anything to make anyone think he will ever be anything but a low level starter. The guy should be a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

  I accept