soldoncass Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Bevel wasn't talking OR hinting about Jackson at all......he was talking about the running backs looking good in PRACTICE picking up blitzes, etc..........BUT, GAMES ARE A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ANIMAL. In other words, just because practices went well, DOESN'T mean they will do well in games. Childress goes by practices....guys on here go by what we see IN GAMES. Rosenfels clearly outplayed Jackson in games this preseason.....by a LOT.....didn't matter which TEAM they were playing WITH or AGAINST....big difference in results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Your wasting your time soldoncass, Rick likes to take what you say and spin it around to make it look like he knows what he's talking about lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shack Posted September 9, 2010 Author Share Posted September 9, 2010 Have you guys heard about the new reality/sitcom show coming soon to Fox: I am starting to think all you guys are right. Might as well start rooting for Green Bay this weekend. Picking my GB jersey up Sat. Again, you guys are right and it can only add up to the Vikes moving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I do not believe that Minnesota will let the Vikes go.We would be real fools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 The first 2 questions asked at every childress press conference this year should be:1. How do you let 12 guys in the huddle2. Why did you trade the better of your 2 backup QB's away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shack Posted September 9, 2010 Author Share Posted September 9, 2010 Do a google HL. They are pumped and if you look for comments, they are liking the reaction from the T-Jack haters and their loss of Sage surrounding the Back-up QB thing. "they got Favre, why all the whining", "better for us in LA" & "they are loosing faith right when we need them to" is the tone. Add in the no plans for a starter because they say T-Jack & Chilly are so bad, the stadium deal was dropped like a game winning rushing ball handed to Peterson and articles like this: Quote: An interesting story has popped up today thanks in part to a Forbes report stating that the Minnesota Vikings are contemplating a move to Los Angeles.The potential relocation centers on the Vikings current stadium the Metrodome. Team owner Zygi Wilf’s lease on the stadium ends after next season and is having a rough time setting up another. According to Forbes, “If Wilf does not have an agreement for a new stadium in Minnesota he will probably move the franchise to Los Angeles, where two separate groups want to build new stadiums.” The article stressed the Vikings owner “has been doing everything possible” to keep the team in Minnesota, but unfortunately the process is not going great at this time. Indeed, the outcome looks bleak. Los Angeles football fans have been clamoring for an NFL team since the relocation of both the Raiders and the Rams. The one-time football haven hasn’t seen a team in years, with most football action coming courtesy of USC or UCLA. What do you think football fans? Will the Vikings in LA be a good or bad thing? Could the MN fan base (voters & tax payers also) be the final cause of the Vikings moving? Could the loss of wonder Sage and the booing crowds towards T-Jack be a sign? Listening to you guys I am starting to think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Uuummmm....im questioning the move to deal Sage as much as anyone, but it hasn't changed my love for the team. I would rather watch the MN vikings with junkson at QB than not have them at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 i'm not saying their NYC, but they don't drop a subject after the fact when there is nothing you can do about it anyway. They keep at it because there is an endless appetite among football fans in general and Vikes fans in particular for second guessing.This and many other threads here in football land prove it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 As if 2nd guessing is something unique to vikings fans.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 As if 2nd guessing is something unique to vikings fans.... It's not. Avid sports fans of all teams don't seem to enjoy the game as much if they can't get in their share of second guessing. No wonder sports reporters do the same thing. Their readers demand it. Saying sports reporters should let something go is akin to telling yourself to shut your own piehole, and I don't see anyone in here doing THAT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_walleye Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I thought you were pulling a LMIT out on me....my bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Foss Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I thought you were pulling a LMIT out on me. Could still happen. The season is young. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I wish Junkson played a different position instead of the most important one on the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we are 'the leading edge' HSO Creators Rick Posted September 10, 2010 we are 'the leading edge' HSO Creators Share Posted September 10, 2010 As for me, if T-Jack is forced into action I hope he stuns all of the T-Jack haters and I HOPE FG is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott K Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 As for me,if T-Jack is forced into action I hope he stuns all of the T-Jack haters and I HOPE FG is wrong. I would think all Vikings fans would hope Jackson could stun us all, but we are sick of waiting for him to stun us even a little bit! It is time to move on, Jackson and Chilly will be both gone by next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHINGURU Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 I wish I was wrong too, but if you watch Junkson you can clearly see he hasn't learned much in 5 years. I'm sure we could still win some football games with him but I'd never count on him to win us a game.If he was a 6th round pick and was never mentioned as a Franchise QB people probably wouldn't hate him as much, we moved up in the 2nd round of the draft and traded away valuable picks for a 5th or 6th round projected QB to be the future of this team, it's laughable, anyone thats OK with it has to be a Packer fan...for real.You 3 fans and Junksons mom are quick to forget this is the guy we went out to get while we needed a QB right now. 5 years later he is still a pie stain. The whole reason we are in a QB mess all the time is because of Junkson and Chilly's love affair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zepman Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 As for me,if T-Jack is forced into action I hope he stuns all of the T-Jack haters and I HOPE FG is wrong. As a fan I would love it if he could do this Rick...and I'm still crossing my fingers in hopes that he can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.