Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If you want access to members only forums on HSO, you will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member. ?

Really?


Recommended Posts

So I had a mechanic from a shop call me today, and he asked me one of the dumbest questions I have heard.

OK, let me give a little detail of the story first, then I will tell you the question. If anyone thinks they have a good answer, let me know, I will pass it back to the tech.

A couple years ago there was this invention going around to improve fuel economy by adding h2o into the combustion chamber, since h2o has hydrogen in it, which burns, and the water will cool the combustion chamber down, which increases fuel economy. Well there were several companies selling their version of how to induct the h20 into the cylinder. And I think I just talked to a future genius that thinks he has the best way to do this. Which before I go any further, I want you to think of this before trying it out at home. Water and metal dont mix, they create a reaction, and will do damage overtime!

Now before he told me what his idea was, he made me promise I wouldnt tell anyone else, so they wouldnt steal his idea. So you all have to promise not to say anything to anybody! wink

He said he had tried a different version of it, but the down side was the injection tube that goes into the water tank would always leak because of the engines compression going into it. So he thought he had an answer to it, why not just mix the water in the vehicles gas tank, then it will get into the combustion chamber through the factory fuel lines, and through the injectors. So he tried it, on one of his vehicles, said it works great, but it suddenly created a missfire as the tank got emptier, the miss got worse. He wanted to know if I knew a way to keep the gas and water mixed better, he said he installed an electric fuel pump inside of his gas tank that just recirculated the gas and was suppose to mix the water and the gas so he wouldnt have this problem.

I told him, that there was just so many things wrong with his idea, and it would just create so many problems in the fuel system, and eventually in the engine, that I strongly recommended to not do this. But he insisted it worked great until the tank got low, so all he needed to do is come up with a way to keep the water mixed thoroughly with the gas, and tried to explain to me why it would work, and that I wasnt being any help, because I dont believe in saving the earth, and I just wanted to continue to use fossil fuels. I was a little loss for words at that point.

Any how, that was my amusement for the month. Again, if you have any great ideas about this, I will pass it along to the tech, and remember, dont tell anyone his secret invention crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I have an idea on whats going on.

when the tank is full the fuel that cavitates or foams rises to the top where it is seperated by the larger volume of liquid fuel. As the fuel level drops there is less volume which makes more room for the foam.

If he installed a pressure regulator on the discharge side of the mixing pump and discharged the mixed fuel in the lowest part of the tank he might decrease some of the cavitation.

The other thought is to cap off the return line at the injector rail and figure out a way to regulate fuel pressure at the pump inside the tank. That way he could control where his discharge goes and fuel would still constantly circulate in the tank and he could eliminate his mixing pump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking the missfire was due to the fact it has water in the fuel. There just isnt no way that would work, as water does not have any btu, and the hydrogen in it wont separate by mixing it with gas, and trying to burn it in the combustion chamber. I can possible see how water can cool the combustion chamber, which in theory a cooler combustion would create better economy, but again, we are talking water, which isnt burning, and will only cause havoc in the cylinder. And any little bit of benefit he would get from the cooler combustion, would be more then lost due to the fact the engine isnt running correct, because there is water in the fuel. At least that is my opinion.

Maybe he is on to something, but I personally think he is just on something!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back a long time ago I was a mechanic on C-97's and the had huge 16 cylinder recip engines. They had a system where they injected water into the cylinders to crank up the power. I only worked on them for about a year and we never came close to using this type of thing, but the USAF thinks it works. Might be a bit more complicated system than the average guy can slap onto his wheels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Years ago,85', I bought a engine block from a drag racer and I was shootin the breeze with him and he showed me a water injector system he installed on his new firebird at the time. As the motor in the firebird was taken out and tweaked with new cams and such. He claimed the water injection added more horses and the big benefit help the engine run smoother with new aggressive cam. The car sure did sound nice with that serious lope when it idled.

I don't remember how this system was set up but I thought throw it out there that water being injected in the motor has been around for a while.

Oh, that engine block I bought well I didn't get a chance to work on it as someone stole it. Sweet block to and I had a 68 firebird to put it into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Water injection works great for performance motors by cooling the intake charge resulting in less knock and lower EGT's. This allows more boost, timing, or compression depending on what the motor is.

Water injection uses a sprayer which is similar to a injector so water isn't just dumped in. Its also usually on a rpm or MAP switch so its not on all the time, just when it's needed.

Most of the time now they use methanol (washer fluid or a more potent formula) for this kind of stuff since its got a little more oomph than just water.

Im not sure what they were doing dumping water into the fuel though. H2o and H are not really the same thing even though one contains the other. They are supposed to be injecting hydrogen gas, not h2o, to get the mpg effect (which is marginal at best). Even then the generators don't really make enough to make it worthwhile. They would be better off being nice to the gas pedal, you can get 20% or more if your easy on it. If it really worked the OEM's would be all over it to meet the ever better mpgs they got to meet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.